This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: David O'Brien <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>,Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>,Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 23:31:09 +0200
Subject: Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
References: <u8elb618ry.fsf@gromit.moeb> <Pine.BSF.4.44.0210041912230.24321-100000@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20021004172529.GD3642@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <u8ptuqxfif.fsf@gromit.moeb> <20021004175836.GD6379@codesourcery.com> <20021004201406.GC23838@dragon.nuxi.com>

> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:58:36AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > Well, I would suggest annotating the PR with the change log entry of
> > the patch that fixed it, if this can be determined, or just 'works for
> > me with <platform>, <date>, <branch>' otherwise.
> 
> That would be very good information to have in the PR.
OK, this looks good, I will try to use this scheme next time.

References:
- Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Is the gcc-3_3-branch creation still on target?
  - From: David O'Brien

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]