This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>,Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,"Martin v. Loewis" <martin at v dot loewis dot de>,Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>,"gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 07:58:05 +0100
Subject: Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
References: <m3r8hdvw99.fsf@mira.informatik.hu-berlin.de> <4220000.1028584720@warlock.codesourcery.com> <20020805182922.H1596@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20020805164814.A13920@redhat.com> <20020806023635.I1596@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

Jakub Jelinek wrote:-

> C doesn't allow oversized bitfields, for say int it treats them as
> int foo : 32 when they are bigger (at least gcc, haven't checked
> the standards on this).

It's a constraint violation in C99.

Neil.

References:
- Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Martin v. Loewis
- Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]