This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C++ ABI testing issues, gcc-3.3 <-> gcc-3.2 compatibility


On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 03:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:
> 
> |> > |> > That's the same result as given on IA-32 or IA-64, but those
> |> > |> > tests are
> |> > |> > #if !defined __i386__ && !defined __ia64__
> |> > |> > Guess at least __alpha__ is a good candidate for this treatment too.
> |> > |> 
> |> > |> x86-64 has the same problem, everything passes except bitfield3 (this
> |> > |> is with GCC 3.2 plus some extra patches),
> |> > 
> |> > Same on s390x.  Are there any platforms where it *does* pass?
> |> I could swear I ran these tests on x86 or powerpc (can't remember which) 
> |> when it was first released by Intel, and everything passed. 
> 
> I just tried on ppc and ppc64 and getting the following failures:
> 
> ppc:
> Test 4 Failure: bitfield3.cpp:60
> Test 9 Failure: dynamic1.cpp:79
>   missing: _Znwm
>   missing: _Znam

Just for completeness:
sparc:
Test 4 Failure: bitfield3.cpp:60
Test 9 Failure: dynamic1.cpp:79

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]