This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: question regarding regrename and failure of 950704-1.c on main branch
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 05:11:17PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> Presumably, DI mode registers were allocated in a manner that didn't
> cause partial overlaps. I think the pattern will work if the destination
> register is the same as one of the input registers.
Then you're probably better off splitting the pattern at sched1
so that you don't have to worry about the early clobber or partial
overlap.
r~