This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Code size regressions, mainline+branch
- From: Daniel Berlin <dan at dberlin dot org>
- To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Cc: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, <rth at cygnus dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:56:09 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: Code size regressions, mainline+branch
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > I assume that you are referring to x86 executable size. Can you
> > narrow the size regression any further? Was binutils updated?
>
> Andreas didn't made any changes on setup of machine and the cfg-branch merger
> provoked same behaviour on the branch as well, so it is not configuration
> change. Still I am feeling puzzled by what happends, hope to find time to
> debug it sometime later this week.
>
> Note that the size is non-stripped, so possibly only debug info got
> bloated but I didn't find anything that may be responsible for that in
> the diffs as well.
Just a note, I just committed the dwarf2 location list stuff, but that was
a few minutes ago, *after* the regressions started showing up.
So don't get confused and blame it.
:)