This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)

To: Olivier Galibert <galibert at pobox dot com>
Subject: Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
Date: 31 Jul 2001 04:05:56 +0200
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107301001210.1374-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <flitgaqmdq.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <20010730213959.A4153@zalem.puupuu.org>

Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com> writes:

| On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:53:37PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > A planet where we do numerical computation for living.
| 
| Then you're supposed to know better than to use -ffast-math.

Certainly.  

Is that supposed to be  an argument for making GCC using ill-formed
computation rules?

-- Gaby

References:
- Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine)
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
  - From: Olivier Galibert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]