This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)

To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
From: Olivier Galibert <galibert at pobox dot com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 21:39:59 -0400
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107301001210.1374-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <flitgaqmdq.fsf@jambon.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>

On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:53:37PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> A planet where we do numerical computation for living.

Then you're supposed to know better than to use -ffast-math.

  OG.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law incombine)
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]