This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: The future C++ template model in gcc?
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 11:09:32PM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> > Why does it have to be setuid?
>
> Sorry, I misinterpreted your comment. In the implementation I
> envision, no extra tool would be required. Instead, instantiation
> control would go into collect2 and/or the linker proper.
>
Agreed. For one thing, I don't believe "It only works on ELF" should
be used as an excuse not to support `export' nor take the advantage
of ELF.
H.J.