This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: The future C++ template model in gcc?

To: hjl at lucon dot org
Subject: Re: The future C++ template model in gcc?
From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at loewis dot home dot cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 23:09:32 +0200
CC: jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, petter at matfys dot lth dot se
References: <200107270649.f6R6n6V01652@mira.informatik.hu-berlin.de> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107270817580.30249-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> <20010727075038.A23175@lucon.org> <200107271747.f6RHl4r00912@mira.informatik.hu-berlin.de> <20010728090851.A20323@lucon.org>

> Why does it have to be setuid?

Sorry, I misinterpreted your comment. In the implementation I
envision, no extra tool would be required. Instead, instantiation
control would go into collect2 and/or the linker proper.

Regards,
Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The future C++ template model in gcc?
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- The future C++ template model in gcc?
  - From: Martin v. Loewis
- Re: The future C++ template model in gcc?
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: The future C++ template model in gcc?
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: The future C++ template model in gcc?
  - From: Martin v. Loewis
- Re: The future C++ template model in gcc?
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]