This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Suggestion for option
- To: mark at codesourcery dot com (Mark Mitchell)
- Subject: Re: Suggestion for option
- From: Joern Rennecke <amylaar at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 21:32:37 +0100 (BST)
- Cc: rjvbertin at hotmail dot com (RenE J.V. Bertin),gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org (gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org)
> The only counter-argument is that there are some errors/warnings that we
> issue only while generating RTL (which is, in and of itself, wrong, in my
> opinion, but many do not agree, and this is an old debate, so I will
> not go there). In any case, missing those errors when some other error has
> already occurred is a small price to pay to make the edit-compile-edit
> cycle faster.
Huh? as soon as you see the first error, you can start the editor to
look at the editor. Nobody forces you to wait till the compilation
is finished.