This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: extv, extzv and insv patterns

To: Roman Lechtchinsky <rl at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: extv, extzv and insv patterns
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:28:55 -0700
References: <200107171516.LAA23504@makai.watson.ibm.com> <Pine.SOL.4.10.10107171729260.14690-100000@sossusvlei> <20010718112356.A15543@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 11:23:56AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> I suggest that the bits be relative to the mode of operand0.

Which would, I see, make the current Alpha definition incorrect,
and since this involves memories, not just registers, brings in
BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN, not just BITS_BIG_ENDIAN.

Ug.  How awful.  I have no idea how best to proceed.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: extv, extzv and insv patterns
  - From: Roman Lechtchinsky

References:
- Re: extv, extzv and insv patterns
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: extv, extzv and insv patterns
  - From: Roman Lechtchinsky
- Re: extv, extzv and insv patterns
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]