This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Beyond GCC 3.0: Summing Up
- To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Beyond GCC 3.0: Summing Up
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:35:19 -0700
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>,"dewar at gnat dot com" <dewar at gnat dot com>,"kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu" <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>,"gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- References: <333370000.994742904@warlock.codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107101319270.20390-100000@host140.cambridge.redhat.com>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:02:38PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
> Taken to its logical conclusion, this means we'll stop all development
> work and just continue making 3.0.x bugfix releases.
> (Maybe we should permanently have two trees, a stable one and an
> experimental one? The interesting question would be what to move
> from the latter to the former, and when.)
>
My question for you is, does the main trunk have the same regression
as the branch?
1. If answer is yes, then fix both the main trunk and the branch.
2. If answer is no, find a way to move the fix from the main trunk to
the branch.
Does that answer your question?
H.J.