Re: [RFC] Suggested replacement for specs and switch handling

[Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>]

Tom Tromey wrote:-

> Geoff> I agree that the compiler should do this.  Couldn't this be
> Geoff> done by, for instance, writing a short textfile that just
> Geoff> contains a list of additional libraries, or by building the gcj
> Geoff> driver after libgcj has configured?
> 
> Yes.  I guess the only question is whether the gcj front end could
> insert these into the linker command line appropriately.  As for
> gcj-specific options, we could just read the file and set the
> appropriate variables directly, without messing with the command line.

Tom,

Does this mean you're happy that we can work something out for gcj if
specs disappear?  If so, that's great.

Thanks,

Neil.