This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC Version question
- To: "Joe Kotulski" <jdkotul at sandia dot gov>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Subject: Re: GCC Version question
- From: "Tim Prince" <tprince at computer dot org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 23:01:49 -0700
- References: <3B311D55.D4EB00D7@sandia.gov>
Some of us could get into trouble with any version. As 2.96 is not a
GCC version, and is supported only by red hat, questions and bug reports
on it won't be appreciated on these lists. 3.0 may generate slower code
than earlier versions on i686; markedly so on P4. If you're into g++,
that may not be a primary consideration.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Kotulski" <jdkotul@sandia.gov>
To: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 3:01 PM
Subject: GCC Version question
>
> I received gcc version 2.96 with my Redhat 7.0 installation.
> Should I upgrade to the newest
> version of gcc 3.0 - ie - am I going to get into trouble using the
> version 2.96?
>
>
> Joe Kotulski
>
> Sandia National Labs
>
>
>