This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: current_funcdef_number vs. except.c

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: current_funcdef_number vs. except.c
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 16:36:48 -0700
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010521104524J.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <20010521131501.B9052@redhat.com> <20010521141943V.mitchell@codesourcery.com>

On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:19:43PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> I guess the latter alternative, since this number is used mostly for
> DWARF2.  Or, make the computation of funcdef_number in except.c #if'd
> on the right condition, instead of doing a run-time `if', much as I
> dislike that. :-(

Done.  I moved the definition outside the conditional in dwarf2out.c.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: current_funcdef_number vs. except.c
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- current_funcdef_number vs. except.c
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: current_funcdef_number vs. except.c
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: current_funcdef_number vs. except.c
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]