This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: current_funcdef_number vs. except.c

To: rth at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: current_funcdef_number vs. except.c
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 14:19:43 -0700
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <20010521104524J.mitchell@codesourcery.com><20010521131501.B9052@redhat.com>

>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

    Richard> Short term, either we can move the definition to
    Richard> except.c, or move it in dwarf2out.c such that it's
    Richard> outside the ifdefs.  I guess I don't care which.
    Richard> Preferences?

I guess the latter alternative, since this number is used mostly for
DWARF2.  Or, make the computation of funcdef_number in except.c #if'd
on the right condition, instead of doing a run-time `if', much as I
dislike that. :-(

Either way, thanks.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: current_funcdef_number vs. except.c
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- current_funcdef_number vs. except.c
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: current_funcdef_number vs. except.c
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]