This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: g++ 2.95 typeinfo::name()
- To: gdr at codesourcery dot com
- Subject: Re: g++ 2.95 typeinfo::name()
- From: Mike Stump <mrs at windriver dot com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 11:08:37 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: Oliver dot Kellogg at vs dot dasa dot de, aoliva at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, rssh at gvinpin dot grad dot kiev dot ua
> To: Mike Stump <mrs@windriver.com>
> Cc: aoliva@redhat.com, rssh@gvinpin.grad.kiev.ua, Oliver.Kellogg@vs.dasa.de,
> gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com>
> Date: 22 Jan 2001 19:45:43 +0100
> | The standard is irrelevant in this case. What Oliver said must be
> | true, must be true, really. Just meeting the standard is fine in many
> | cases, however, at times, we do want to do more than the standard.
> You're making a wish and I understand that.
No, I'm doing more than that. I am stating a release requirement, and
also stating the current behavior of our compiler, and I suspect every
C++ compiler out there.
> But that doesn't make the current behaviour a bug as far as the
> standard is concerned.
I know that. Maybe you thought I was commenting on the demangled
version of the name, I was not. I was merely commenting on the
already implemented behavior of the compiler and Alexandre's remark.