This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: -std's (was Re: v3 link failures analyzed)

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

| On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 07:55:19AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Maybe, it is time to add -iso to mean iso9899:1990 for it is somehow
| > counterintuitive not to recognize -std=c90 (== c89) AND recognize
| > -ansi as -std=iso9899:1990.  That is just inconsistent.
| 
| I thought we'd gotten them all the same.  There must be
| lingering specs losage, or it was broken afterward.

OK.

| There will be no -iso option.  That's what -std=c89 is for.

Hmm, I'm having some trouble to understand why the short for the
defaulted ISO standard should read '-ansi'.  Could you elaborate
please?  

-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC                       http://www.codesourcery.com
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]