This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC build failed with your patch on 2001-01-09T11:35:00Z.
- To: aoliva at redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: GCC build failed with your patch on 2001-01-09T11:35:00Z.
- From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:36:14 -0800
- CC: rth at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, grahams at redhat dot com, jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, mhayes at redhat dot com, neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk, osk at hem dot passagen dot se
- References: <200101091215.EAA27623@sloth.cygnus.com><firstname.lastname@example.org><200101091810.KAA21760@geoffk.org> <email@example.com>
- Reply-to: Geoff Keating <geoffk at redhat dot com>
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,
> email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
> From: Alexandre Oliva <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
> Date: 09 Jan 2001 16:22:01 -0200
> I can't promise to fix all problems on all 64-bit targets. I know
> there are a number of 64-bit targets that already work with a 64-bit
> HOST_WIDE_INT; I was surprised that ppc wasn't one of them. I'm
> pretty sure the problem must be in the ppc back-end, since there are
> so many other 64-bit targets that are working correctly.
powerpc-eabi is a 32-bit target. I don't want this patch. I've
carefully not made this change for several years, because it will make
code generation worse in the common case. How can a backend override
- Geoffrey Keating <email@example.com>