This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P?

To: rth at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P?
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 00:02:23 -0800
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, oldham at codesourcery dot com
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <20010108114321Z.mitchell@codesourcery.com><20010108173228.A2746@redhat.com>

>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

    Richard> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:43:21AM -0800, Mark Mitchell
    Richard> wrote:
    >> Is RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P supposed to be set only for instructions
    >> that actually modify the stack pointer (or frame pointer, or
    >> saves a register) -- or any instruction that vaguely
    >> contributes to that process?

    Richard> Yes.  The marked instruction should be contributing
    Richard> somehow.

Thanks; that confirms that the MIPS code is bogus...

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P?
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]