gcc archive
author index for December, 1999

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

66338294

• 1999-12-17 00:49 Wanted! Online Business Partners

Nuno Pinhão

• 1999-12-27 07:35 Help on GNU Fortran development

Ralf Gütlein

• 1999-12-09 02:56 H8300: bugs(?) and quirks with eightbit_data

A E

• 1999-12-01 08:24 Eastwood Recommends Vol. 8.

Alain Magloire

• 1999-12-30 14:10 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2

Alan Cox

• 1999-12-27 14:02 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches

Albert E. Whale

• 1999-12-30 05:51 Problems compiling - gcc Command line arguments
• 1999-12-30 08:25 Re: Problems compiling - gcc Command line arguments

Alexandre Oliva

• 1999-12-01 02:28 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-01 03:00 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-01 03:33 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-01 08:45 Re: Stringstreams?!
• 1999-12-01 08:47 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-03 10:49 Re: How inlined are inlined functions?
• 1999-12-03 11:10 Re: How inlined are inlined functions?
• 1999-12-06 11:28 Re: Linux Shared Libraries - How to create?
• 1999-12-08 06:36 Re: gcc 2.95.2 problem
• 1999-12-08 08:54 Re: egcs-1.0.3
• 1999-12-14 09:08 Re: Pb with template
• 1999-12-15 13:07 Re: gcc/kcc difference
• 1999-12-22 11:24 Re: 64 bit gcc/g++ 2.95.2 on solaris 7 (sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7)
• 1999-12-23 10:34 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches

Andi Kleen

• 1999-12-13 06:25 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?)
• 1999-12-27 02:41 Re: Integrating a new front end to GCC - avoiding flames later
• 1999-12-30 05:00 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2
• 1999-12-30 06:10 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2

Andreas Jaeger

• 1999-12-11 07:51 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?)

Andreas Schwab

• 1999-12-01 09:06 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-09 06:32 Re: More agressive entity removal during linking
• 1999-12-13 02:00 Re: RTL check: access of elt 1 of `not' with last elt 0
• 1999-12-20 08:19 Re: gcc-2.95.2: configure option --with-local-prefix

Andris Pavenis

• 1999-12-02 02:48 egcs-19991201: problem with garbage collector in cc1
• 1999-12-07 00:18 Re: Results for 2.96 19991129 (experimental) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnu
• 1999-12-08 08:37 Re: Results for 2.96 19991129 (experimental) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnu

Andy Rysin

• 1999-12-22 17:15 GCC speed

Anil Deshpande

• 1999-12-06 11:45 Core dump while compiling with gnu gcc-2.95.2
• 1999-12-15 08:23 very very urgent
• 1999-12-15 08:44 Fw: very very urgent
• 1999-12-15 09:08 Re: Fw: very very urgent

Anja Müller

• 1999-12-22 09:00 Porting the GCC to 8051-Microcontroller ? Register Banks

Anjul Srivastava

• 1999-12-03 10:14 RE: How inlined are inlined functions?
• 1999-12-03 11:28 RE: How inlined are inlined functions?
• 1999-12-07 13:49 Labels Question
• 1999-12-09 13:22 g++'s non-conformance

Anthony Green

• 1999-12-01 14:01 Re: varargs for decoding stack frames ?

anwar.sayid

• 1999-12-15 08:09 GCC

Artem Hodyush

• 1999-12-27 08:24 Re: GCC for Win95
• 1999-12-27 08:30 Re: GCC for Win95

Austin Green

• 1999-12-06 17:11 Successful build of GNU C and C++ on HP-UX

Benjamin Kosnik

• 1999-12-13 16:24 [c++] CVS gcc-2.96 -O2 vs gcc-2.95.2 -O2
• 1999-12-21 21:15 Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7
• 1999-12-22 22:53 Re: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7
• 1999-12-29 09:41 Re: -fnew-abi and branching

Benjamin Scherrey

• 1999-12-01 00:11 Re: Problem building gcc-2.95.2 under SCO 2.1.1
• 1999-12-13 11:27 Re: __property keyword support in GCC

Bernd Schmidt

• 1999-12-18 11:20 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-18 17:46 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros

Brad Lucier

• 1999-12-10 14:46 -m32 support on sparc
• 1999-12-14 16:40 Alpha hasn't bootstrapped for 4 weeks (libio problem)

Brian Beuning

• 1999-12-08 05:05 Re: gcc 2.95.2 problem

Brian Cook

• 1999-12-14 10:38 Athlon 550

Brian Ford

• 1999-12-06 14:07 Re: build problems
• 1999-12-22 06:52 Re: g77 Help Wanted?
• 1999-12-23 08:15 Re: gcc on m88k
• 1999-12-23 10:58 Re: Having problems

brian_robson

• 1999-12-19 15:37 GET YOUR MONEY FROM A LAWSUIT and MAKE MONEY DOING IT!

Brown, Rodney

• 1999-12-11 17:57 Re: Error while building egcs-19991208 on hppa2.0n-hp-hpux11.00

Bruce Korb

• 1999-12-30 08:59 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2
• 1999-12-31 08:26 cccp.c compile error in 2.95.2

Bruno Haible

• 1999-12-01 13:48 Re: varargs for decoding stack frames ?

Chiradeep Chakrabarti

• 1999-12-27 11:27 gcc Help Wanted?

Chmouel Boudjnah

• 1999-12-01 11:04 Re: RPMS for gcc-2.95.2

Chris Dickens

• 1999-12-07 05:56 Assistance required

CIH

• 1999-12-22 18:42 GCC For Embedded!?

co51ekl

• 1999-12-15 04:52 Internet..stock..news

Curtis R. Anderson

• 1999-12-18 00:16 Re: Using and Porting the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC)
• 1999-12-18 18:37 Re: Compile bug?

Cynthia Oi-Wing Lui

• 1999-12-08 19:45 gcc Installation on a new system (no compiler at all).

Dan Nicolaescu

• 1999-12-04 13:31 not hoisting loads/stores
• 1999-12-07 23:11 Re: bb and loop profiling (was: [PATCH] sparc64-linux multilibs])
• 1999-12-16 17:02 Re: not hoisting loads/stores

dane482

• 1999-12-04 03:08 ARE YOU BEING INVESTIGATED??

Dave Avery

• 1999-12-26 22:53 Re: Bootstraps every night?

Dave Brolley

• 1999-12-09 08:13 Re: cpp w/DOS line feeds

David Edelsohn

• 1999-12-01 11:42 Re: AIX 4.3 and COLLECT_EXPORT_LIST
• 1999-12-08 08:00 Re: Installing gcc whithout having C compilator
• 1999-12-22 09:45 Re: Bootstraps every night?
• 1999-12-22 17:44 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches
• 1999-12-28 22:44 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches

David S. Miller

• 1999-12-18 21:53 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-18 22:59 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros

David Starner

• 1999-12-04 19:30 Anyone try CC=tcc make bootstrap?
• 1999-12-09 13:38 Re: g++'s non-conformance

Denis Chertykov

• 1999-12-11 09:29 `shorten_branches' and length of `asm' without operands
• 1999-12-14 12:57 Re: `shorten_branches' and length of `asm' without operands
• 1999-12-15 13:07 Re: bug in internal PUSH expanding (splitting)
• 1999-12-31 04:06 Re: Segment register support for the i386

Dima Volodin

• 1999-12-19 09:47 MINIMUM_ATOMIC_ALIGNMENT ???
• 1999-12-19 10:11 Re: MINIMUM_ATOMIC_ALIGNMENT ???

Doug Landauer

• 1999-12-21 12:36 Re: Internal macros as fns for debug

Dr. David Gilbert

• 1999-12-10 04:51 -fexternal-templates

dsaves

• 1999-12-04 01:39 INVESTIGATE ANYONE!
• 1999-12-04 02:47 INVESTIGATE ANYONE!

Eric A. Ayer

• 1999-12-16 16:31 subscribe crossgcc mwalker@ee.pdx.edu

Erik Mouw

• 1999-12-24 04:47 Re: Problem with calling conventions.
• 1999-12-30 07:10 Re: Problems compiling - gcc Command line arguments
• 1999-12-30 09:04 Re: Problems compiling - gcc Command line arguments

ezeng

• 1999-12-21 19:19 g77 Help Wanted?

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 1999-12-06 17:03 Building current CVS source on solaris-2.7
• 1999-12-22 17:36 Re: valarray???
• 1999-12-29 04:14 Re: -fnew-abi and branching
• 1999-12-29 10:49 Re: -fnew-abi and branching

gary valentin

• 1999-12-01 11:55 where is symbol __CTOR_LIST__ defined?

GAVELLE NOEL

• 1999-12-23 17:44 g77 Help Wanted?

Geoff Keating

• 1999-12-16 12:47 Re: common branch conditions - could optimize better
• 1999-12-17 18:26 New PPC branch.
• 1999-12-19 21:15 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-19 21:53 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 11:58 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 14:40 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 15:05 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 17:43 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 19:12 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-21 13:36 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-22 15:36 Re: Data on PDF vs PS (Was Re: Online docs page should ..) [With prelim patch]
• 1999-12-26 15:17 Re: Integrating a new front end to GCC - avoiding flames later
• 1999-12-27 12:03 Re: gcc Help Wanted?

Georg C. F. Greve

• 1999-12-01 07:45 Stringstreams?!
• 1999-12-02 05:18 dynamic_cast Problem
• 1999-12-02 06:10 Re: dynamic_cast Problem
• 1999-12-20 07:16 Deriving into different namespaces
• 1999-12-20 18:01 Re: Deriving into different namespaces

Gerald Gutierrez

• 1999-12-03 23:42 Large binaries!
• 1999-12-05 12:18 char & wchar_t encoding

Gerald Pfeifer

• 1999-12-08 11:20 Re: A small problem with the gcc-patches mailing list archives
• 1999-12-08 11:24 Re: CVS down?
• 1999-12-09 06:45 PATCH for "FYI: hppa*-hp-hpux10 recommended patch superseded"
• 1999-12-10 16:26 Steering Committee Affiliations
• 1999-12-10 17:09 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?)
• 1999-12-12 04:42 Re: gcc 2.95.1 for windows NT
• 1999-12-15 08:28 Re: GCC
• 1999-12-15 08:58 Re: Fw: very very urgent
• 1999-12-17 12:39 Re: GCC museum?
• 1999-12-18 17:14 Re: sizeof bool > sizeof int ?!?
• 1999-12-19 15:41 gcc2@cygnus.com
• 1999-12-20 15:45 Re: DSSL home page
• 1999-12-23 02:33 Re: GCC speed
• 1999-12-23 16:44 Re: GCC museum?
• 1999-12-23 18:03 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-29 13:26 Web pages (was: GCC museum?)
• 1999-12-29 17:49 Reply-To: (was: -fnew-abi and branching)
• 1999-12-30 08:36 Re: Problems compiling - gcc Command line arguments

GLASGOW, Tee - Motel 6

• 1999-12-23 10:53 Having problems

Godmar Back

• 1999-12-01 00:49 extending libgcc's exception delivery path
• 1999-12-06 16:19 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path
• 1999-12-06 17:02 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path
• 1999-12-07 13:21 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path
• 1999-12-07 17:49 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path

Guy Blelloch

• 1999-12-14 09:55 Splay Trees

H.J. Lu

• 1999-12-10 08:13 binutils 2.9.5.0.22 is released.
• 1999-12-19 19:30 Re: Linux vs. libio

Hans-Peter Nilsson

• 1999-12-21 12:01 Internal macros as fns for debug (was: Re: regno_reg_rtx and relatedmacros)
• 1999-12-21 13:21 Re: Internal macros as fns for debug

Harvey J. Stein

• 1999-12-30 09:28 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2

Helge Hafting

• 1999-12-03 00:28 A small problem with the gcc-patches mailing list archives

HomeLoans

• 1999-12-18 02:19 Home Loans & Refinancing Available

Hristo Laftchiev

• 1999-12-11 07:58 g77 Help Wanted?

Hung Vu

• 1999-12-19 23:48 GCC compiler

internetbusiness30

• 1999-12-30 03:24 Why Do SOME PEOPLE SUCCEED In Internet Business While Others Fail?

ironyjk

• 1999-12-08 21:57 [Q] I downloaded gcc HP-UX 10.20 binary....

Jacek Generowicz

• 1999-12-13 08:25 Friends of template classes.

James Mullaney

• 1999-12-23 15:39 Delete files within Fortran

Jamie Lokier

• 1999-12-01 05:04 Re: Local optimization on i386 ?
• 1999-12-11 11:14 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?)
• 1999-12-13 06:44 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?)
• 1999-12-14 05:06 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?)
• 1999-12-14 05:11 Re: __property keyword support in GCC
• 1999-12-20 09:09 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 09:18 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-21 08:04 Re: Inlining Improvements
• 1999-12-21 09:06 Re: Inlining Improvements
• 1999-12-21 16:00 Re: Inlining Improvements
• 1999-12-22 06:57 Re: Inlining Improvements

Jan Hubicka

• 1999-12-09 02:34 Questional REG_N_SETS usage...
• 1999-12-22 08:22 Bootstraps every night?

Jan Vroonhof

• 1999-12-20 12:57 Data on PDF vs PS (Was Re: Online docs page should ..) [With prelim patch]
• 1999-12-21 03:22 Re: Data on PDF vs PS (Was Re: Online docs page should ..) [With prelim patch]

Jason Gunthorpe

• 1999-12-08 23:02 More agressive entity removal during linking
• 1999-12-09 00:11 Re: More agressive entity removal during linking

Jason Merrill

• 1999-12-03 14:18 Re: How inlined are inlined functions?
• 1999-12-06 16:36 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path
• 1999-12-10 14:22 Re: -fexternal-templates
• 1999-12-13 20:26 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request
• 1999-12-14 17:33 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request
• 1999-12-15 11:18 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request
• 1999-12-15 16:18 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request
• 1999-12-16 17:43 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request
• 1999-12-17 18:11 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request
• 1999-12-20 09:24 Re: Linux vs. libio

Jeffrey A Law

• 1999-12-01 02:35 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-01 16:53 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-01 17:04 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-01 17:06 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-08 23:17 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path
• 1999-12-08 23:29 Re: More agressive entity removal during linking
• 1999-12-09 02:00 Re: More agressive entity removal during linking
• 1999-12-09 02:46 Re: Questional REG_N_SETS usage...
• 1999-12-09 16:52 Re: m68k: "instruction/operands mismatch" -- Statement 'moveb a3,d1' ignored
• 1999-12-12 21:10 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?)
• 1999-12-13 00:04 gcc/doprnt.c
• 1999-12-13 19:36 Re: [PATCH] F77 on sparc64-*-*
• 1999-12-13 20:20 Re: Loop patch update (Was: Re: Autoincrement examples)
• 1999-12-15 01:32 Re: bug in internal PUSH expanding (splitting)
• 1999-12-16 01:11 Re: not hoisting loads/stores
• 1999-12-16 01:15 Re: common branch conditions - could optimize better
• 1999-12-16 02:08 Re: common branch conditions - could optimize better
• 1999-12-16 19:49 Re: not hoisting loads/stores
• 1999-12-16 23:18 Re: common branch conditions - could optimize better
• 1999-12-20 05:22 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 05:23 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-20 05:25 Re: gcc2@cygnus.com
• 1999-12-20 07:11 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 09:11 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 09:34 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 13:45 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 14:34 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 14:46 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 16:02 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 16:14 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 16:22 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 20:02 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 20:13 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 20:19 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 20:30 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-21 09:43 Re: Inlining Improvements
• 1999-12-21 11:53 Re: FAQ-O-Matic
• 1999-12-24 05:37 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-28 14:10 Re: Segment register support for the i386
• 1999-12-28 14:10 Re: Integrating a new front end to GCC - avoiding flames later
• 1999-12-28 14:11 Re: Integrating a new front end to GCC - avoiding flames later
• 1999-12-28 22:33 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches
• 1999-12-29 09:55 Re: -fnew-abi and branching
• 1999-12-29 18:14 Apology
• 1999-12-29 20:10 Re: fix for execute/991221-1.c -O1 failure

Jim Blandy

• 1999-12-03 08:49 How inlined are inlined functions?

Joe Buck

• 1999-12-01 16:59 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-03 11:14 RE: How inlined are inlined functions?
• 1999-12-03 11:34 Re: How inlined are inlined functions?
• 1999-12-03 12:13 Re: How inlined are inlined functions?
• 1999-12-10 09:35 Re: Re[2]: g++'s non-conformance
• 1999-12-11 10:16 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?)
• 1999-12-13 10:25 Re: __property keyword support in GCC
• 1999-12-13 11:58 Re: __property keyword support in GCC
• 1999-12-13 11:59 Re: __property keyword support in GCC
• 1999-12-13 12:07 Re: __property keyword support in GCC
• 1999-12-13 14:59 Re: __property keyword support in GCC
• 1999-12-14 10:52 Re: Athlon 550
• 1999-12-15 12:40 Re: gcc/kcc difference
• 1999-12-15 15:55 Re: gcc/kcc difference
• 1999-12-20 10:05 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 11:46 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 12:12 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 14:43 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 14:45 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 15:38 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 15:41 Re: DSSL home page
• 1999-12-20 16:31 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 16:50 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 18:13 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 18:18 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 22:41 tone of recent discussion re: libio, Linux and new ABI
• 1999-12-21 16:08 Re: Inlining Improvements
• 1999-12-21 18:02 Re: Linux vs. libio

Joern Rennecke

• 1999-12-01 16:51 gcc.c-torture/execute/991112-1.c: set_nonzero_bits_and_sign_copies problem
• 1999-12-03 15:34 Re: Need Help
• 1999-12-08 10:57 Re: Autoincrement examples
• 1999-12-10 08:42 Re: Autoincrement examples
• 1999-12-10 16:59 Loop patch update (Was: Re: Autoincrement examples)
• 1999-12-13 14:37 Re: Loop patch update (Was: Re: Autoincrement examples)
• 1999-12-13 14:59 Autoincrement example (Was: Re: Loop patch update (Was: Re: Autoincrement examples))
• 1999-12-13 15:28 Re: Autoincrement examples
• 1999-12-14 11:20 Re: Loop patch update (Was: Re: Autoincrement examples)
• 1999-12-14 13:34 Re: `shorten_branches' and length of `asm' without operands
• 1999-12-14 15:49 Autoincrement patches (Was: Re: Autoincrement examples)
• 1999-12-15 10:21 Re: Having trouble in porting gcc 2.95
• 1999-12-16 15:05 Re: Autoincrement patches
• 1999-12-17 18:08 Re: Autoincrement examples
• 1999-12-18 09:49 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-20 11:06 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 18:33 Re: Autoincrement patches
• 1999-12-21 17:04 Re: Loop patch update (Was: Re: Autoincrement examples)
• 1999-12-22 13:05 Re: Porting the GCC to 8051-Microcontroller ? Register Banks
• 1999-12-23 22:45 Re: fix for execute/991221-1.c -O1 failure
• 1999-12-29 10:18 Re: killing STDC_0_IN_SYSTEM_HEADERS
• 1999-12-29 15:19 Re: More on type sizes
• 1999-12-29 15:50 Re: More on type sizes
• 1999-12-29 16:28 Re: More on type sizes
• 1999-12-29 17:07 Re: sizetype, bitsizetype and DECL_FIELD_BITPOS
• 1999-12-29 19:31 Re: sizetype, bitsizetype and DECL_FIELD_BITPOS
• 1999-12-30 09:20 Re: fix for execute/991221-1.c -O1 failure
• 1999-12-30 09:37 Re: sizetype, bitsizetype and DECL_FIELD_BITPOS
• 1999-12-30 12:55 Re: fix for execute/991221-1.c -O1 failure
• 1999-12-31 10:49 Re: Segment register support for the i386

John Hughes

• 1999-12-01 03:08 RE: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-01 03:56 RE: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-01 08:21 RE: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?

John Sanabria

• 1999-12-03 14:47 MMX??

john smith

• 1999-12-12 20:54 gcc platforms

John Wehle

• 1999-12-27 13:30 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2

johnboyd22

• 1999-12-28 01:16 Private Club Pays You by The Minute.

Jonathan Larmour

• 1999-12-09 10:10 Re: More agressive entity removal during linking
• 1999-12-20 14:26 Re: Linux vs. libio

Jose Felix Hernandez

• 1999-12-27 11:02 Compiling old source code

Juan Jose Casero

• 1999-12-01 10:42 RPMS for gcc-2.95.2

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 1999-12-07 12:29 Re: Building current CVS source on solaris-2.7
• 1999-12-11 06:42 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?)
• 1999-12-12 20:28 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?)
• 1999-12-13 08:57 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?)

Kevin Atkinson

• 1999-12-20 12:02 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 23:02 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-21 11:23 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-26 13:15 Why is dynamic_cast so dam slow?
• 1999-12-31 01:56 Re: Inlining Improvements

korbb

• 1999-12-01 09:50 Re: Why config.guess
• 1999-12-27 11:30 Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2

Lance Uyehara

• 1999-12-20 13:51 gcc and arm and swi

Laszlo Barabas

• 1999-12-08 08:13 egcs-1.0.3

law

• 1999-12-01 02:04 gcc-ss-19991201 is now available
• 1999-12-08 10:08 gcc-ss-19991208 is now available
• 1999-12-14 07:48 gcc-ss-19991214 is now available
• 1999-12-21 05:24 gcc-ss-19991221 is now available
• 1999-12-28 11:09 gcc-ss-19991228 is now available

Leland Hovey

• 1999-12-08 06:02 New optimizations for GCC

linas

• 1999-12-28 22:09 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches

Linus Torvalds

• 1999-12-20 16:20 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-22 20:51 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-23 17:55 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches
• 1999-12-24 11:41 Re: Segment register support for the i386
• 1999-12-28 14:47 Re: Segment register support for the i386
• 1999-12-30 11:24 Re: Segment register support for the i386

llewelly

• 1999-12-18 22:56 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-20 00:02 Re: GCC compiler
• 1999-12-22 11:45 Re: valarray???

loansource

• 1999-12-15 03:07 AD: Home Loans - No Equity Required!

MaherBenSedrine

• 1999-12-08 03:00 Re: Installing gcc whithout having C compilator

Malory D'costa

• 1999-12-14 05:22 Library Documentation

Manfred Hollstein

• 1999-12-05 02:05 Re: Results for 2.96 19991129 (experimental) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnu
• 1999-12-08 05:22 Re: Results for 2.96 19991129 (experimental) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnu

Mangesh Bhandarkar

• 1999-12-10 23:55 wstring

Mansoor Peerbhoy

• 1999-12-15 02:41 Problem declaring a Wide char string
• 1999-12-16 22:36 Problem with exporting class names
• 1999-12-24 03:44 Problem with calling conventions.

Marc Espie

• 1999-12-21 15:03 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-21 15:06 Re: Linux vs. libio

Marc Girod

• 1999-12-01 05:53 egcs-19991201: compiler error in `reload_cse_simplify_operands', at reload1.c:9192
• 1999-12-11 09:58 Error while building egcs-19991208 on hppa2.0n-hp-hpux11.00
• 1999-12-11 11:16 Re: Error while building egcs-19991208 on hppa2.0n-hp-hpux11.00
• 1999-12-20 12:49 Re: gcc-ss-19991214 is now available

Marc Lehmann

• 1999-12-01 16:10 Re: Local optimization on i386 ?
• 1999-12-04 04:16 Re: How inlined are inlined functions?
• 1999-12-04 04:16 Re: MMX??
• 1999-12-13 15:25 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?)
• 1999-12-20 13:55 Re: Data on PDF vs PS (Was Re: Online docs page should ..) [With prelim patch]
• 1999-12-21 01:15 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-22 10:15 Re: Data on PDF vs PS (Was Re: Online docs page should ..) [With prelim patch]
• 1999-12-30 04:28 Re: Help on GNU Fortran development

Marcin Dalecki

• 1999-12-22 00:15 Re: Inlining Improvements

Marciniszyn, Mike (WingspanTech)

• 1999-12-22 10:34 64 bit gcc/g++ 2.95.2 on solaris 7 (sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7)

Marcos Barreto de Castro

• 1999-12-06 10:39 Linux Shared Libraries - How to create?

Mark Kettenis

• 1999-12-24 08:42 Segment register support for the i386
• 1999-12-30 09:55 Re: Segment register support for the i386

Mark Mitchell

• 1999-12-03 10:50 Re: How inlined are inlined functions?
• 1999-12-03 11:44 Re: How inlined are inlined functions?
• 1999-12-03 12:27 Re: How inlined are inlined functions?
• 1999-12-09 00:24 `atexit' and destructors for local statics
• 1999-12-09 00:50 Re: `atexit' and destructors for local statics
• 1999-12-11 10:55 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version(?)
• 1999-12-18 11:38 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-18 15:11 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-18 17:39 Re: sizeof bool > sizeof int ?!?
• 1999-12-18 17:43 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-18 17:57 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-19 18:35 Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-19 22:21 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-19 22:28 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-19 22:33 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-19 22:47 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-19 22:58 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-19 23:21 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-19 23:27 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-19 23:35 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-19 23:55 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 09:16 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 09:26 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 09:28 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 10:43 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 11:07 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 15:07 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 15:11 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 15:31 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 15:55 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 16:33 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 16:41 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 18:08 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 18:23 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 23:55 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-21 08:55 Re: Inlining Improvements
• 1999-12-22 07:58 Re: Inlining Improvements
• 1999-12-28 14:21 -fnew-abi and branching
• 1999-12-29 09:41 Re: -fnew-abi and branching
• 1999-12-29 10:31 Re: -fnew-abi and branching
• 1999-12-29 21:43 Re: Apology

Markus Mertens

• 1999-12-24 01:56 build success

Martin Reinecke

• 1999-12-21 02:25 g++: change in behaviour since gcc-2.95.2

Martin v. Loewis

• 1999-12-01 01:03 Re: iostream problems on irix6.5.5/gcc2.95.2
• 1999-12-02 13:42 Re: GCC for Windows NT
• 1999-12-02 14:22 Re: where is symbol __CTOR_LIST__ defined?
• 1999-12-04 02:56 Re: MMX??
• 1999-12-04 03:17 Re: Large binaries!
• 1999-12-05 14:12 Re: char & wchar_t encoding
• 1999-12-06 00:16 Re: SINIX support
• 1999-12-07 13:14 Re: Assistance required
• 1999-12-10 15:20 Re: Assistance
• 1999-12-11 04:36 Re: wstring
• 1999-12-13 16:31 Re: Friends of template classes.
• 1999-12-13 16:36 Re: __property keyword support in GCC
• 1999-12-13 16:52 Re: __property keyword support in GCC
• 1999-12-13 17:01 Re: compile question
• 1999-12-15 13:00 Re: Problem declaring a Wide char string
• 1999-12-15 15:33 Re: gcc/kcc difference
• 1999-12-15 15:42 Re: gcc/kcc difference
• 1999-12-15 15:50 Re: gcc/kcc difference
• 1999-12-17 01:23 Re: Problem with exporting class names
• 1999-12-17 15:18 Re: QUESTION ON 2.95.2
• 1999-12-18 09:47 Re: QUESTION ON 2.95.2
• 1999-12-18 13:52 Re: QUESTION ON 2.95.2
• 1999-12-20 06:47 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 10:31 Re: Deriving into different namespaces
• 1999-12-20 15:19 DSSL home page
• 1999-12-21 04:54 Re: g++: change in behaviour since gcc-2.95.2
• 1999-12-21 04:59 Re: Inlining Improvements
• 1999-12-21 09:46 Re: Inlining Improvements
• 1999-12-22 00:04 Re: Inlining Improvements
• 1999-12-22 00:35 Re: Inlining Improvements
• 1999-12-22 01:56 Re: Inlining Improvements
• 1999-12-22 03:18 Re: problem with egcs...
• 1999-12-22 04:47 Re: Is libstdc++ in stock egcs 1.1.2 thread-safe?
• 1999-12-23 02:15 Re: GCC For Embedded!?
• 1999-12-23 02:21 Re: GCC speed
• 1999-12-26 14:51 Re: Converting the gcc backend to a library?
• 1999-12-26 16:01 Re: Why is dynamic_cast so dam slow?
• 1999-12-27 02:46 Re: Integrating a new front end to GCC - avoiding flames later
• 1999-12-30 00:43 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2
• 1999-12-30 00:58 Re: Help on GNU Fortran development
• 1999-12-30 01:19 Re: Problem with calling conventions.
• 1999-12-30 05:13 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2
• 1999-12-30 07:40 Re: Problems compiling - gcc Command line arguments
• 1999-12-30 13:07 Re: Segment register support for the i386
• 1999-12-30 13:25 Re: fix for execute/991221-1.c -O1 failure

Marty Leisner

• 1999-12-11 10:52 Re: Online docs page should provide a downloadable PS version (?)
• 1999-12-24 12:46 help with specs files

Matthew Brown

• 1999-12-22 07:38 Re: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7
• 1999-12-22 11:55 Re: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7
• 1999-12-27 09:12 Re: Re[2]: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7

Melissa G. Vasquez

• 1999-12-13 07:52 compile question

Michael Brady

• 1999-12-31 10:21 looking for a binary executible of gcc

michael cardenas

• 1999-12-22 14:02 precompiled headers / dependency checking

Michael Hayes

• 1999-12-08 14:38 Re: Autoincrement examples
• 1999-12-10 13:36 Re: Autoincrement examples
• 1999-12-14 19:58 Re: Autoincrement patches
• 1999-12-17 18:27 Re: Autoincrement examples
• 1999-12-20 18:41 Re: Autoincrement patches

Michael Meissner

• 1999-12-24 06:28 Re: Problem with calling conventions.

Michael Vance

• 1999-12-21 15:53 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-22 15:30 Re: precompiled headers / dependency checking

Mikael Djurfeldt

• 1999-12-26 10:56 Converting the gcc backend to a library?
• 1999-12-26 11:26 Re: Converting the gcc backend to a library?

Mike Hopkirk(hops)

• 1999-12-01 12:12 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-02 16:26 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-02 16:42 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?

Mike Stump

• 1999-12-01 14:43 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path
• 1999-12-07 12:21 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path
• 1999-12-07 16:43 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path
• 1999-12-07 16:48 Re: Labels Question
• 1999-12-07 18:52 Re: extending libgcc's exception delivery path
• 1999-12-08 15:20 Re: C compiler for Psion 5 (EPOC)
• 1999-12-14 12:12 Re: Library Documentation
• 1999-12-20 17:01 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 22:24 FAQ-O-Matic
• 1999-12-21 14:52 FAQ-O-Matic bugs
• 1999-12-21 15:11 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-28 15:33 Re: GCC speed
• 1999-12-28 15:41 Re: GCC For Embedded!?
• 1999-12-28 16:55 Re: Compiling old source code
• 1999-12-28 17:33 Re: IBM Linux/390 patches

Mumit Khan

• 1999-12-08 22:55 Re: [Q] I downloaded gcc HP-UX 10.20 binary....
• 1999-12-11 18:22 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request
• 1999-12-12 21:02 Re: gcc platforms
• 1999-12-12 23:29 Re: gcc 2.95.1 for windows NT
• 1999-12-15 11:05 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request
• 1999-12-15 15:42 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request
• 1999-12-16 15:17 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request
• 1999-12-16 22:45 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request
• 1999-12-19 13:32 Re: Workaround for virtual function/dllimport bug, also patch guidance request
• 1999-12-22 11:15 Re: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7

N8TM

• 1999-12-08 22:49 Re: gcc Installation on a new system (no compiler at all).
• 1999-12-08 22:56 Re: [Q] I downloaded gcc HP-UX 10.20 binary....
• 1999-12-09 05:42 Re: cpp w/DOS line feeds
• 1999-12-12 09:06 Re: gcc 2.95.1 for windows NT
• 1999-12-20 21:35 Re: "C--"
• 1999-12-23 17:43 Re: Delete files within Fortran
• 1999-12-27 08:38 Re: GCC for Win95
• 1999-12-31 11:44 Re: looking for a binary executible of gcc

Nate Begeman

• 1999-12-17 23:26 Using and Porting the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC)

Nathan Sidwell

• 1999-12-02 05:36 Re: dynamic_cast Problem
• 1999-12-28 03:23 Re: Why is dynamic_cast so dam slow?

nbecker

• 1999-12-15 11:37 gcc/kcc difference
• 1999-12-16 05:09 Re: gcc/kcc difference response from KAI support

Nguyen Thanh Thuy

• 1999-12-01 19:41 GCC for Windows NT

Nick Clifton

• 1999-12-24 13:02 Re: help with specs files

Oskar Enoksson

• 1999-12-21 02:49 Inlining Improvements

P40rtBhRN

• 1999-12-15 09:56 Satellite Owners! Must See!

Paul Caruana

• 1999-12-08 08:50 C compiler for Psion 5 (EPOC)

Paul D. Townsend

• 1999-12-30 11:52 LEADS, LEADS AND MORE LEADS

Per Bothner

• 1999-12-09 21:28 Re: cpp w/DOS line feeds
• 1999-12-20 08:52 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 10:00 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 11:28 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 11:55 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 12:28 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 12:46 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 20:47 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 20:56 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-21 10:05 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-21 11:33 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-26 11:11 Re: Converting the gcc backend to a library?
• 1999-12-28 20:01 Re: Berkeley Regex - was: fixincludes jumbo patch 2
• 1999-12-29 16:56 Re: More on type sizes
• 1999-12-29 22:55 Re: More on type sizes

Peter Schulte-Stracke

• 1999-12-22 17:01 IBM Linux/390 patches

Phil Edwards

• 1999-12-03 08:25 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-22 08:52 Re: valarray???
• 1999-12-23 11:19 Re: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7
• 1999-12-29 11:12 Re: -fnew-abi and branching
• 1999-12-30 08:25 Re: Reply-To: (was: -fnew-abi and branching)

Philippe De Muyter

• 1999-12-13 01:08 Re: gcc/doprnt.c
• 1999-12-15 09:23 bootstrap failure, genrecog, strstr, build and host

Piotr Nestorow

• 1999-12-08 04:34 gcc 2.95.2 problem

pogde prashant

• 1999-12-03 14:02 Need Help

poulard

• 1999-12-14 08:43 Pb with template

pressrelease

• 1999-12-09 02:44 NEW STOCK PICK - Bidhit.com: Trading symbol-BHIT
• 1999-12-09 07:23 NEW STOCK PICK - Bidhit.com: Trading symbol-BHIT

Providence Home Crafts

• 1999-12-06 04:02 Decorate your cake and eat it too

QCSBS

• 1999-12-28 05:09 MAKE THE MILLENNIUM COUNT!!!

rao

• 1999-12-16 20:58 g77 Help Wanted?

realthing

• 1999-12-25 08:59 GCC for Win95
• 1999-12-25 09:08 GCC for Win95

Reinhard Nissl

• 1999-12-19 12:39 gcc-2.95.2: configure option --with-local-prefix

Rich Churcher

• 1999-12-19 02:38 Re: GCC museum?
• 1999-12-28 18:50 Re: GCC museum?
• 1999-12-29 05:20 Re: GCC museum?
• 1999-12-29 18:58 Re: Web pages (was: GCC museum?)

Richard Hadsell

• 1999-12-22 14:23 Re: Porting the GCC to 8051-Microcontroller ? Register Banks

Richard Henderson

• 1999-12-07 23:35 Re: bb and loop profiling (was: [PATCH] sparc64-linux multilibs])
• 1999-12-30 12:41 Re: Segment register support for the i386

Richard Kenner

• 1999-12-18 07:10 regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-18 11:46 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-18 17:29 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-18 17:48 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-18 18:03 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-19 02:33 Re: regno_reg_rtx and related macros
• 1999-12-19 09:48 Re: MINIMUM_ATOMIC_ALIGNMENT ???
• 1999-12-25 18:36 sizetype, bitsizetype and DECL_FIELD_BITPOS
• 1999-12-26 03:44 More on type sizes
• 1999-12-29 15:26 Re: More on type sizes
• 1999-12-29 16:15 Re: More on type sizes
• 1999-12-29 16:33 Re: More on type sizes
• 1999-12-29 17:03 Re: More on type sizes
• 1999-12-29 17:35 Re: sizetype, bitsizetype and DECL_FIELD_BITPOS
• 1999-12-30 02:10 Re: sizetype, bitsizetype and DECL_FIELD_BITPOS
• 1999-12-30 02:16 Re: Apology
• 1999-12-30 02:28 Re: More on type sizes
• 1999-12-31 01:06 Re: sizetype, bitsizetype and DECL_FIELD_BITPOS

Rick Hohensee

• 1999-12-20 19:32 "C--"

rlau

• 1999-12-01 10:44 g77 internal question

Robert J. Schweikert

• 1999-12-23 09:18 g77 Help Wanted?

Robert Lipe

• 1999-12-01 00:53 Re: Problem building gcc-2.95.2 under SCO 2.1.1
• 1999-12-01 01:04 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-01 08:04 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-01 09:22 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-01 13:02 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-02 08:11 Re: question in install gcc on SCO unix 3.2v5.0.4
• 1999-12-03 09:39 Re: Why does config.guess come up with such wacky stuff?
• 1999-12-20 21:19 Re: "C--"

Roman Belenov

• 1999-12-09 23:13 Re[2]: g++'s non-conformance
• 1999-12-23 03:05 Re[2]: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7
• 1999-12-25 10:19 Re: GCC for Win95
• 1999-12-27 09:37 Re[4]: Announcing libstdc++-2.90.7

Scott O'Donnell

• 1999-12-15 17:50 g77 write bug?

Shmulik Rippa

• 1999-12-22 03:01 Is libstdc++ in stock egcs 1.1.2 thread-safe?

Simon Barton

• 1999-12-09 20:27 Bookmarks

Skvarenina Peter - 5ZA51/9

• 1999-12-13 09:51 __property keyword support in GCC
• 1999-12-13 10:55 Re: __property keyword support in GCC
• 1999-12-13 14:17 Re: __property keyword support in GCC

Sleepycat Software

• 1999-12-03 14:13 Re: DB 3.0.55, memset() and overoptimizacion [#1395]

Steve Ettorre

• 1999-12-21 18:22 problem with egcs...
• 1999-12-22 08:08 valarray???

Steven W Orr

• 1999-12-14 11:21 Re: Athlon 550

Stuart Summerville (NEC)

• 1999-12-09 01:37 Re: cpp w/DOS line feeds

Takayoshi Kouchi

• 1999-12-15 03:04 Having trouble in porting gcc 2.95

Takis Psarogiannakopoulos

• 1999-12-17 02:44 QUESTION ON 2.95.2
• 1999-12-17 15:48 Re: QUESTION ON 2.95.2
• 1999-12-18 10:01 RE:Re: QUESTION ON 2.95.2

Tim Josling

• 1999-12-26 12:16 Re: Converting the gcc backend to a library?
• 1999-12-26 12:40 Integrating a new front end to GCC - avoiding flames later
• 1999-12-26 21:17 Re: Integrating a new front end to GCC - avoiding flames later

Tobias Walkowiak

• 1999-12-30 03:40 build status gcc 2.95.2

Tom Tromey

• 1999-12-01 11:18 Re: Why config.guess
• 1999-12-29 11:00 Re: -fnew-abi and branching

toon

• 1999-12-08 11:56 Re: m68k: "instruction/operands mismatch" -- Statement 'moveb a3,d1' ignored
• 1999-12-11 12:44 RTL check: access of elt 1 of `not' with last elt 0
• 1999-12-14 12:10 Re: [PATCH] F77 on sparc64-*-*
• 1999-12-14 12:23 Re: [PATCH] F77 on sparc64-*-*

Tou, Brian

• 1999-12-02 10:09 looking gcc for hpux 10.20

Ulf Bartelt

• 1999-12-23 02:20 gcc on m88k

Ulrich Drepper

• 1999-12-19 21:04 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-19 22:30 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-19 22:44 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-19 23:11 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-19 23:14 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-19 23:41 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 09:20 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-20 21:05 Re: Linux vs. libio
• 1999-12-21 11:38 Re: Linux vs. libio

Ulrich Lauther

• 1999-12-26 02:28 Re: GCC for Win95

Villumsen, Ole Vedel

• 1999-12-13 03:42 Successful installation on alphaev6-dec-osf4.0e

vpXUEkD0f

• 1999-12-01 23:59 Banned and Uncensored! Mouthwatering!

vuqpham

• 1999-12-31 23:54 multipy-defined function

wangji

• 1999-12-02 05:13 question in install gcc on SCO unix 3.2v5.0.4

wbrill101@yahoo.com

• 1999-12-05 22:52 there will be a new business in the line
• 1999-12-09 02:37 What Fell Out Of Santas Bag !!

William F Severance

• 1999-12-22 09:28 g77 Help Wanted?

Wolfram Gloger

• 1999-12-01 01:42 Re: Is this a bug in GNU ld?

yang xu chun

• 1999-12-06 00:12 g77 Help Wanted?

Yixin Wang

• 1999-12-09 07:39 Assistance

Zack Weinberg

• 1999-12-26 20:22 killing STDC_0_IN_SYSTEM_HEADERS

Zhang Yuzhu

• 1999-12-05 17:53 SINIX support

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)