This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Unreviewed^2 patch: libtool.m4 changes for multilib
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- To: Ulrich Weigand <weigand at immd1 dot informatik dot uni-erlangen dot de>
- Cc: aoliva at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, jakub at redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:39:11 +0100
- Subject: Re: Unreviewed^2 patch: libtool.m4 changes for multilib
- References: <200211191916.UAA02406@faui11.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Ulrich Weigand <weigand@immd1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> writes:
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
>>The rules for patches for libtool files is that, if they're in the
>>libtool CVS repository, they're pre-approved, otherwise, they have to
>>be submitted there, then merged in here.
>
> Ah, I wasn't aware of that. Thanks!
>
>>In case the patch that makes it to libtool CVS is significantly
>>different, given how far behind the copy in GCC is, I hereby approve
>>the patch you posted here for GCC, as long as an equivalent patch
>>makes it to libtool CVS first.
>
> In checking this out, I noticed that just yesterday, a much more
> generic patch due to Andreas Jaeger and Jakub Jelinek was checked
> into the libtool CVS (this obsoletes the patch I proposed).
Can you double check whether the patch fixes all of your problems?
> Andreas/Jakub, will you be checking this change into the gcc CVS
> as well?
I'll do that tomorrow. I first had to know the rules but now I know
what to do...
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj