This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/4454] [mips] Suboptimal schedule following unroll of "reversed" loops in gcc
- From: "echristo at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 Jun 2003 22:36:48 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/4454] [mips] Suboptimal schedule following unroll of "reversed" loops in gcc
- References: <20011003065601.4454.gheorghe@us.ibm.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4454
------- Additional Comments From echristo@redhat.com 2003-06-02 22:36 -------
Subject: Re: [mips] Suboptimal schedule following
unroll of "reversed" loops in gcc
On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 18:50, dhazeghi@yahoo.com wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4454
> Eric,
>
> this is your area of expertise, so I was wondering whether you could comment on this issue, and
> whether you think the problem is still present. Thanks,
I'm not empowered by bugzilla at my current address so here's what I
think we should do:
a) this works as he expects at -O3
b) the "problem" shows up in current sources, however, i'll point to a)
here.
c) this is almost completely something for the loop unroller people to
look at. If one of them wants to comment then that's cool, otherwise I
think we can just close it.
-eric
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.