when i used gcc-11.0 compile linux kernel in arch/x86/include/asm/checksum_64.h:171 trigger a bug here is compile source code argurment gcc -Wp,-MMD,net/core/.utils.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11.0.0/include -I../arch/x86/include -I./arch/x86/include/generated -I../include -I./include -I../arch/x86/include/uapi -I./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I../include/uapi -I./include/generated/uapi -include ../include/linux/kconfig.h -include ../include/linux/compiler_types.h -D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wundef -Werror=strict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fshort-wchar -fno-PIE -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=return-type -Wno-format-security -std=gnu89 -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -mno-avx -m64 -falign-jumps=1 -falign-loops=1 -mno-80387 -mno-fp-ret-in-387 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 -mskip-rax-setup -mtune=generic -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mindirect-branch=thunk-extern -mindirect-branch-register -fno-jump-tables -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Wno-frame-address -Wno-format-truncation -Wno-format-overflow -Wno-address-of-packed-member -O2 -fno-allow-store-data-races -Wframe-larger-than=2048 -fstack-protector-strong -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wno-unused-const-variable -fomit-frame-pointer -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wvla -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-stringop-truncation -Wno-zero-length-bounds -Wno-array-bounds -Wno-stringop-overflow -Wno-restrict -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -fno-strict-overflow -fno-stack-check -fconserve-stack -Werror=date-time -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types -Werror=designated-init -fmacro-prefix-map=../= -fcf-protection=none -Wno-packed-not-aligned -I ../net/core -I ./net/core -DKBUILD_MODFILE='"net/core/utils"' -DKBUILD_BASENAME='"utils"' -DKBUILD_MODNAME='"utils"' -c -o net/core/utils.o ../net/core/utils.c here is gcc configure: # gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --program-suffix=-11 --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --enable-multilib --enable-pugin --prefix=/usr Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 11.0.0 20201027 (experimental) (GCC) here is trigger bug source code : static inline unsigned add32_with_carry(unsigned a, unsigned b) { asm("addl %2,%0\n\t" "adcl $0,%0" : "=r" (a) : "0" (a), "rm" (b)); return a; } gcc-11.0 combine inline-asm (insn 43 84 44 5 (parallel [ (set (reg:SI 126 [ a ]) (asm_operands:SI ("addl %2,%0 adcl $0,%0") ("=r") 0 [ (reg:SI 126 [ a ]) (not:SI (mem/j:SI (plus:DI (reg/v/f:DI 108 [ skb ]) (const_int 136 [0x88])) [169 skb_7(D)->D.41008.csum+0 S4 A64])) ] [ (asm_input:SI ("0") ../arch/x86/include/asm/checksum_64.h:171) (asm_input:SI ("rm") ../arch/x86/include/asm/checksum_64.h:171) ] [] ../arch/x86/include/asm/checksum_64.h:171)) (clobber (reg:CC 17 flags)) ]) "../arch/x86/include/asm/checksum_64.h":171:2 -1 (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 17 flags) (nil))) gcc-10 combine inline-asm (insn 43 84 44 5 (parallel [ (set (reg:SI 126 [ a ]) (asm_operands:SI ("addl %2,%0 adcl $0,%0") ("=r") 0 [ (reg:SI 126 [ a ]) (reg:SI 127) ] [ (asm_input:SI ("0") ../arch/x86/include/asm/checksum_64.h:171) (asm_input:SI ("rm") ../arch/x86/include/asm/checksum_64.h:171) ] [] ../arch/x86/include/asm/checksum_64.h:171)) (clobber (reg:CC 17 flags)) ]) "../arch/x86/include/asm/checksum_64.h":171:2 -1 (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 127) (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 17 flags) (nil)))) the difference between gcc10 and gcc 11 in asm_operand_ok() recog.c gcc-11 is case CT_MEMORY: case CT_SPECIAL_MEMORY: /* Every memory operand can be reloaded to fit. */ result = result || memory_operand (extract_mem_from_operand (op), VOIDmode); break; and gcc-10 is case CT_MEMORY: case CT_SPECIAL_MEMORY: /* Every memory operand can be reloaded to fit. */ result = result || memory_operand (op, VOIDmode); break; so in gcc-11 the insn (not:SI (mem/j:SI (plus:DI (reg/v/f:DI 108 [ skb ]) (const_int 136 [0x88])) [169 skb_7(D)->D.41008.csum+0 S4 A64]) can not reocg in lra_set_insn_recog_data() here is the bactrace : during RTL pass: reload ../net/core/utils.c: In function 'inet_proto_csum_replace_by_diff': ../net/core/utils.c:485:1: internal compiler error: in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1004 485 | } | ^ 0x6a0287 lra_set_insn_recog_data(rtx_insn*) ../../gcc/lra.c:1004 0xc23bcf lra_get_insn_recog_data ../../gcc/lra-int.h:488 0xc23bcf remove_scratches_1 ../../gcc/lra.c:2064 0xc23d17 lra_emit_move(rtx_def*, rtx_def*) ../../gcc/lra.c:506 0xc361d6 curr_insn_transform ../../gcc/lra-constraints.c:4523 0xc37666 lra_constraints(bool) ../../gcc/lra-constraints.c:5123 0xc2426c lra(_IO_FILE*) ../../gcc/lra.c:2415 0xbdfde1 do_reload ../../gcc/ira.c:5529 0xbdfde1 execute ../../gcc/ira.c:5715 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report. See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions. reported by TencentOS team
I think we have a dup of this already.
Likely dup of PR97540.
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > Likely dup of PR97540. Yes, it should be.
Dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 97540 ***
YES DUP.