Bug 67420 - gfortran.dg/norm2_3.f90 FAILs
Summary: gfortran.dg/norm2_3.f90 FAILs
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: gcc
Classification: Unclassified
Component: fortran (show other bugs)
Version: 6.0
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Not yet assigned to anyone
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-09-01 11:24 UTC by Rainer Orth
Modified: 2019-01-26 11:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Host: sparc*-sun-solaris2.12
Target: sparc*-sun-solaris2.12
Build: sparc*-sun-solaris2.12
Known to work:
Known to fail:
Last reconfirmed: 2015-09-01 00:00:00


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rainer Orth 2015-09-01 11:24:45 UTC
The gfortran.dg/norm2_3.f90 testcase FAILs on Solaris 12/SPARC (both 32 and 64-bit):

FAIL: gfortran.dg/norm2_3.f90   -O0  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/norm2_3.f90   -O1  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/norm2_3.f90   -O2  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/norm2_3.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/norm2_3.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/norm2_3.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/norm2_3.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/norm2_3.f90   -Os  execution test

Running it under gdb reveals

Program aborted. Backtrace:
#0  0xFF2EEB37
Abort

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
[Switching to Thread 1 (LWP 1)]
0xf2bba064 in __lwp_sigqueue () from /lib/libc.so.1
(gdb) where
#0  0xf2bba064 in __lwp_sigqueue () from /lib/libc.so.1
#1  0xf2b07dc8 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.1
#2  0xf2ad6d14 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.1
#3  0xff2effd8 in _gfortrani_sys_abort ()
    at /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libgfortran/runtime/error.c:180
#4  0xff38e35c in _gfortran_abort ()
    at /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libgfortran/intrinsics/abort.c:33
#5  0x00011560 in MAIN__ ()
    at /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/norm2_3.f90:28

  Rainer
Comment 1 Francois-Xavier Coudert 2015-09-01 13:24:56 UTC
Given the location of the failure, this is probably a duplicate of PR67420, because we use the built-in sqrtl() in NORM2. Marked as SUSPENDED for now.
Comment 2 Jakub Jelinek 2016-04-27 10:57:23 UTC
GCC 6.1 has been released.
Comment 3 Jakub Jelinek 2016-12-21 10:57:12 UTC
GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
Comment 4 Richard Biener 2017-07-04 08:47:07 UTC
GCC 6.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
Comment 5 Dominique d'Humieres 2018-02-19 10:08:28 UTC
> Given the location of the failure, this is probably a duplicate of PR67420,
> because we use the built-in sqrtl() in NORM2. Marked as SUSPENDED for now.

Self-referencing duplicate!

Looking at the results posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2017-01/msg00014.html this PR seems fixed since more than a year.
Comment 6 Dominique d'Humieres 2019-01-26 11:10:56 UTC
> Looking at the results posted at 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2017-01/msg00014.html
> this PR seems fixed since more than a year.

No feedback, closing as FIXED.