This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: mudflap problem


On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 01:05:52AM -0500, Doug Graham wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 04:40:12PM -0500, Doug Graham wrote:
> The test program parse.c is the same one I sent you a while back.
> Here are the numbers:
> 
>   neither:  0.43s user 0.13s system 101% cpu  0.553 total
>   bounds:   7.01s user 0.28s system  99% cpu  7.297 total
>   mudflap: 25.27s user 5.08s system 100% cpu 30.339 total

Forgot to mention: this is on a Fedora Core 3 system running on an Athlon
XP 3200+.  I find it interesting that mudflap used almost as much system
CPU as bounds checking used total CPU.  AFAIK, the only extra system CPU
that would be used by mudflap are the frequent calls to gettimeofday.
So I tried a run after setting -no-timestamps in MUDFLAP_OPTIONS and
got this:

    mudflap: 19.51s user 0.56s system 99% cpu 20.075 total

Saved a bunch of user CPU too.

Getting closer.

--Doug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]