gcc archive
date index for February, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

February 28, 2005
23:52 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Diego Novillo
23:52 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Diego Novillo
23:49 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Mark Mitchell
23:46 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Andrew Pinski
23:46 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Nathanael Nerode
23:44 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Steven Bosscher
23:41 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Diego Novillo
23:31 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Nathanael Nerode
21:27 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Laurent GUERBY
20:58 http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html Johan Bergman \(KI/EAB\)
20:56 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Steven Bosscher
20:48 Re: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Zack Weinberg
20:47 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Zack Weinberg
20:46 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Zack Weinberg
20:44 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Zack Weinberg
20:33 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Zack Weinberg
20:09 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects) Joern RENNECKE
19:59 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Kazu Hirata
19:21 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build Geoffrey Keating
18:59 Mach-O and C++ static template definitions Michael Rosellini
18:42 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Paul Schlie
18:36 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects) Dale Johannesen
18:30 Re: 16-bit real-mode code DJ Delorie
18:23 Re: 16-bit real-mode code Bernd Jendrissek
18:19 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects) Joern RENNECKE
18:14 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects) Jeffrey A Law
18:01 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects) Dale Johannesen
18:00 RE: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Dave Korn
18:00 RE: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Dave Korn
17:24 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph? Jeffrey A Law
17:22 Re: Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode Phil Edwards
17:10 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Paul Schlie
16:37 Re: A question about DOM Jeffrey A Law
16:32 Re: IA64 record alignment rules, and modes? Steve Ellcey
16:08 No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph? Richard Guenther
15:50 Constant pointer to (member) function, indirect call Helge Bahmann
15:45 [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF Ted Teah via RT
15:14 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Richard Sandiford
15:00 Re: Extension compatibility policy Marc Espie
14:55 Proposed high_indirection switch R. D. Flowers
14:41 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Kazu Hirata
14:30 RE: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:24 Re: Extension compatibility policy Robert Dewar
14:08 RE: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Dave Korn
14:08 RE: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build Dave Korn
14:08 Re: GIV optimizations Steven Bosscher
13:20 GIV optimizations Canqun Yang
12:53 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects) Jakub Jelinek
12:52 [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x Vladimir Ivanov
12:43 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects) Joern RENNECKE
12:28 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Marc Espie
12:11 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Laurent GUERBY
12:04 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Bernd Schmidt
11:41 Question about ObjC++ state Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
11:35 Re: Extension compatibility policy Giovanni Bajo
11:19 Re: Extension compatibility policy Giovanni Bajo
09:25 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
09:13 Re: 16-bit real-mode code Josef Angermeier
08:50 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
08:36 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Paolo Bonzini
08:35 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Paolo Bonzini
02:57 RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros Zack Weinberg
02:51 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Devang Patel
02:31 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Richard Kenner
02:22 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Gabriel Dos Reis
02:18 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Gabriel Dos Reis
02:04 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Mark Mitchell
02:03 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Mark Mitchell
01:24 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Mark Mitchell
01:18 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Steven Bosscher
01:01 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build Benjamin Herrenschmidt
00:56 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Daniel Jacobowitz
00:52 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Andrew Pinski
00:46 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Giovanni Bajo
00:36 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Giovanni Bajo
00:33 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build David Edelsohn
00:31 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Zdenek Dvorak
00:24 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Mark Mitchell
00:17 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build Benjamin Herrenschmidt
00:06 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Zdenek Dvorak
00:05 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Zdenek Dvorak
00:04 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build Andrew Pinski
00:01 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Daniel Berlin

February 27, 2005
23:57 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Mark Mitchell
23:56 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Mark Mitchell
23:56 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build David Edelsohn
23:54 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects David Edelsohn
23:50 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build Benjamin Herrenschmidt
23:43 building Microchip's pic30 dsPIC version of binutils and GCC John Steele Scott
23:42 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build Alan Modra
23:40 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build Andrew Pinski
23:38 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Zdenek Dvorak
23:37 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build David Edelsohn
23:29 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Marcin Dalecki
23:29 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Marcin Dalecki
23:29 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Marcin Dalecki
23:26 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Andrew Pinski
23:17 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Daniel Jacobowitz
23:16 A question about DOM Kazu Hirata
23:08 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Gabriel Dos Reis
23:02 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build Benjamin Herrenschmidt
23:01 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Gabriel Dos Reis
22:59 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Mark Mitchell
22:58 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build Benjamin Herrenschmidt
22:57 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Mark Mitchell
22:54 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build David Edelsohn
22:53 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Gabriel Dos Reis
22:50 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build Benjamin Herrenschmidt
22:47 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build Andrew Pinski
22:46 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Mark Mitchell
22:45 Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build Benjamin Herrenschmidt
22:42 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Andrew Pinski
22:30 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Steven Bosscher
22:28 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
22:23 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Mark Mitchell
22:14 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
21:41 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Mark Mitchell
21:20 Re: AMD64. sign extension correct? Andreas Schwab
21:16 Re: Extension compatibility policy Dale Johannesen
21:07 Re: AMD64. sign extension correct? Falk Hueffner
20:50 AMD64. sign extension correct? Claus-Justus Heine
20:49 Re: Extension compatibility policy Mike Hearn
19:49 Re: Extension compatibility policy Devang Patel
18:42 XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc Vladimir Merzliakov
18:26 gcc-4.1-20050227 is now available gccadmin
17:22 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Gabriel Dos Reis
17:22 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Mark Hahn
17:12 Re: SVN plans update Marcin Dalecki
16:57 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
16:30 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Jan Hubicka
16:24 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Paul Schlie
16:23 Re: Extension compatibility policy Dale Johannesen
15:55 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
15:09 Re: Extension compatibility policy Robert Dewar
14:32 Re: Extension compatibility policy Joseph S. Myers
14:21 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
14:20 Re: Extension compatibility policy Robert Dewar
14:12 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
14:07 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Steven Bosscher
14:02 Re: Extension compatibility policy Marc Espie
14:01 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Jan Hubicka
13:58 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Jan Hubicka
13:54 How to choose reasonable default inlining limits? Richard Guenther
13:28 Re: IA64 record alignment rules, and modes? Richard Sandiford
13:27 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Nathan Sidwell
12:48 Re: Extension compatibility policy Joseph S. Myers
12:43 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
12:15 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns chris jefferson
11:51 Re: Mainline java is broken Steven Bosscher
11:43 Re: Extension compatibility policy Robert Dewar
11:40 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
10:46 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Steven Bosscher
10:33 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Jan Hubicka
10:33 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
09:57 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
07:38 Re: Extension compatibility policy Eric Botcazou
07:21 Re: Mainline java is broken Andreas Jaeger
02:50 RE:about gcc -XLinker -M gan_xiao_jun
01:29 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Steven Bosscher
01:06 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
00:03 Re: gcc leaking? Daniel Jacobowitz

February 26, 2005
23:56 Re: gcc leaking? Stefan Strasser
23:50 gcc-4.0-20050226 is now available gccadmin
23:23 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
23:20 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
23:19 Re: Decimal Floating-Point Robert Dewar
22:55 Decimal Floating-Point David Starner
22:27 Re: gcc leaking? Tommy Vercetti
22:27 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Steven Bosscher
22:03 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Jan Hubicka
20:09 Re: Mainline java is broken Andrew Pinski
19:50 Extension compatibility policy Mike Hearn
19:44 Mainline java is broken Steven Bosscher
19:25 Web page still claims mainline frozen Nathanael Nerode
19:13 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Nathanael Nerode
18:55 SVN plans update Daniel Berlin
18:51 gcc leaking? Stefan Strasser
18:43 gcc-3.4.4-20050211: maybe a danger behaviour Denis Zaitsev
18:35 IA64 record alignment rules, and modes? Gary Funck
18:30 Re: GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC? Paul Brook
17:57 Re: GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC? Sam Lauber
16:02 about gcc -XLinker -M gan_xiao_jun
13:37 which trapping operation integer types are required in libgcc2 ? Paul Schlie
12:43 Re: GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC? Toon Moene
08:40 Help : Instruction Scheduling Sachin Sonawane
07:53 Re: __builtin_frame_address on MIPS Richard Sandiford
04:14 testsuite execution question Steve Kargl
03:41 Re: reinventing frameworks in gnu toolchain (fwd) Rogelio M . Serrano Jr .
02:38 Re: GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC? Sam Lauber
01:44 Re: RFA: dominator opts Dale Johannesen
01:29 Re: RFA: dominator opts Andrew Pinski
01:24 RFA: dominator opts Dale Johannesen
00:00 gcc-3.4-20050225 is now available gccadmin

February 25, 2005
23:21 Re: New C parser to be committed Joseph S. Myers
22:23 Re: Should mainline be 5.0/4.1? Daniel Jacobowitz
22:22 Should mainline be 5.0/4.1? H. J. Lu
21:46 __builtin_frame_address on MIPS Ranjit Deshpande
21:23 Re: patch [RFC] Simple loop runs out of stack at -O1 Fariborz Jahanian
21:16 Re: patch [RFC] Simple loop runs out of stack at -O1 Joe Buck
20:51 patch [RFC] Simple loop runs out of stack at -O1 Fariborz Jahanian
20:46 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Mark Mitchell
20:44 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Nathan Sidwell
20:32 Richard's inlining-heuristics patch helps much Benjamin Redelings I
19:58 Bugs updated from 4.0 regression to 4.1 regression Daniel Berlin
19:40 Re: GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC? Marcin Dalecki
18:43 RE: GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC? Dave Korn
18:12 optimize cold partitions for size? (4.1) stelios xanthakis
18:12 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects) Dale Johannesen
17:48 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects) Joern RENNECKE
17:40 Re: CVS problem Steven Bosscher
17:35 hacking frameworks for linux Rogelio M . Serrano Jr .
17:34 Re: -Ttext with -mthumb causes relocation truncated to fit Mark Mitchell
17:17 CVS problem Zdenek Dvorak
16:26 Re: -Ttext with -mthumb causes relocation truncated to fit Shaun Jackman
15:29 Re: GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC? Bernd Jendrissek
14:14 Re: New C parser to be committed Marcin Dalecki
14:04 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects Steven Bosscher
13:49 GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF M Ranga Swami Reddy
13:49 Re: New C parser to be committed Steven Bosscher
12:59 Re: New C parser to be committed Rogelio M . Serrano Jr .
12:56 Re: New C parser to be committed Andrew Pinski
12:54 Re: New C parser to be committed Lars Segerlund
12:00 Re: New C parser to be committed Rogelio M . Serrano Jr .
11:29 New C parser to be committed Joseph S. Myers
09:52 GCC 4.1 Projects Mark Mitchell
09:51 GCC 4.0 Branch Mark Mitchell
09:09 Re: -Ttext with -mthumb causes relocation truncated to fit Mark Mitchell
08:43 Mainline frozen Mark Mitchell
07:46 Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0 Uros Bizjak
04:05 GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC? Sam Lauber
03:12 what's the proper way to configure/enable/disable C exceptionhandling? Paul Schlie
00:18 Specifying a linker script from the specs file Shaun Jackman
00:16 Re: -Ttext with -mthumb causes relocation truncated to fit Daniel Jacobowitz
00:05 Re: C++ math optimization problem... Benjamin Redelings I

February 24, 2005
23:23 -Ttext with -mthumb causes relocation truncated to fit Shaun Jackman
23:13 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table Tarun Kawatra
23:02 mthumb in specs file Shaun Jackman
21:44 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table Daniel Berlin
21:32 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table Tarun Kawatra
21:31 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table Tarun Kawatra
21:29 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table Steven Bosscher
21:26 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table Steven Bosscher
21:26 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table James E Wilson
21:25 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table Tarun Kawatra
21:22 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table Daniel Berlin
21:15 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table Andrew Pinski
20:56 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table Tarun Kawatra
20:43 -Wfatal-errors=n Benjamin Kosnik
20:16 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table James E Wilson
20:04 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table James E Wilson
20:02 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table James E Wilson
19:45 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
19:07 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
18:30 Quick 4.0 status update Mark Mitchell
18:07 Re: [wwwdocs] CVS annotate brings me to GNATS Gerald Pfeifer
17:59 Re: Suggestion: Different exit code for ICE Mark Mitchell
17:57 Seeking patch for bug in lifetime of __cur in deque::_M_fill_initialize(powerpc dw2 EH gcc 3.4.2) Earl Chew
17:24 Re: Suggestion: Different exit code for ICE Janis Johnson
17:21 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table Tarun Kawatra
16:31 Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0 Biagio Lucini
16:31 Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0 Richard Guenther
16:29 Re: Suggestion: Different exit code for ICE Sam Lauber
16:09 Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0 Biagio Lucini
16:06 Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0 Richard Guenther
15:52 Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0 Paolo Bonzini
15:39 Change in treelang maintainership Gerald Pfeifer
15:27 Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0 Vladimir Makarov
15:24 Re: Bug in tree-inline.c:estimate_num_insns_1? Richard Guenther
15:13 Re: Bug in tree-inline.c:estimate_num_insns_1? Andrew Pinski
15:09 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Jan Hubicka
15:07 Bug in tree-inline.c:estimate_num_insns_1? Richard Guenther
14:57 Re: Is 'mfcr' a legal opcode for RS6000 RIOS1? David Edelsohn
14:04 Benchmark of gcc 4.0 Biagio Lucini
13:57 Re: __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries Andrew Haley
13:24 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
13:15 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Steven Bosscher
12:58 Inlining and estimate_num_insns Richard Guenther
11:30 Is 'mfcr' a legal opcode for RS6000 RIOS1? Kai Ruottu
11:16 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table Steven Bosscher
10:46 Suggestion: Different exit code for ICE Volker Reichelt
10:29 Re: C++ math optimization problem... Richard Guenther
10:14 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table Tarun Kawatra
09:41 Feature request: Globalize symbol Fredrik Hugosson
06:30 Re: 16-bit real-mode code Etienne Lorrain
02:38 Apology (was: Re: C++ PATCH:) Gabriel Dos Reis
01:20 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd Nicholas Nethercote
00:59 Re: 16-bit real-mode code DJ Delorie
00:53 Re: 16-bit real-mode code Sam Lauber
00:18 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table James E Wilson
00:09 Re: C++ PATCH: Andreas Schwab

February 23, 2005
23:49 gcc-3.3-20050223 is now available gccadmin
23:34 Re: C++ PATCH: Gabriel Dos Reis
23:30 Re: C++ PATCH: Gabriel Dos Reis
23:29 Re: C++ PATCH: Gabriel Dos Reis
22:58 Re: RFC: Separate correctness and optimization tests Joseph S. Myers
22:33 Re: C++ PATCH: Neil Booth
22:17 RFC: Separate correctness and optimization tests Nathanael Nerode
22:10 Re: C++ -fno-weak with template instantiations Daniel Jacobowitz
22:00 RE: C++ -fno-weak with template instantiations Davda, Bhavesh P \(Bhavesh\)
21:55 Re: C++ -fno-weak with template instantiations Daniel Jacobowitz
21:50 RE: C++ -fno-weak with template instantiations Davda, Bhavesh P \(Bhavesh\)
21:41 Re: C++ PATCH: Andreas Schwab
21:40 Re: C++ -fno-weak with template instantiations Daniel Jacobowitz
21:34 C++ -fno-weak with template instantiations Davda, Bhavesh P \(Bhavesh\)
21:29 Re: C++ math optimization problem... Stefan Strasser
21:19 Re: C++ PATCH: Marcin Dalecki
20:59 Re: C++ math optimization problem... Andrew Pinski
20:54 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd Michael Cieslinski
20:49 Re: C++ math optimization problem... Stefan Strasser
20:31 Re: C++ PATCH: James E Wilson
20:20 PATCH for Re: DWARF Website Gerald Pfeifer
20:14 Re: C++ PATCH: Andreas Schwab
19:48 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd James E Wilson
19:45 Re: C++ PATCH: Gabriel Dos Reis
19:37 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd James E Wilson
19:33 Re: C++ PATCH: Gabriel Dos Reis
19:28 Re: C++ PATCH: Gabriel Dos Reis
19:26 Re: C++ PATCH: Tom Tromey
19:24 Re: C++ PATCH: Gabriel Dos Reis
19:17 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd Doug Graham
19:08 GCC Summit deadline approaching Janis Johnson
19:04 Re: C++ math optimization problem... Benjamin Redelings I
18:34 C++ math optimization problem... Benjamin Redelings I
18:22 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0? Gerald Pfeifer
18:07 Re: C++ PATCH: Marcin Dalecki
18:03 Re: C++ PATCH: Mark Mitchell
18:02 Re: C++ PATCH: Jakub Jelinek
18:01 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd Joe Buck
17:56 Re: Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode Patrick McFarland
17:56 Re: warning: conflicting types for built-in function %qD Devang Patel
17:55 Re: C++ PATCH: Gabriel Dos Reis
17:49 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd Frank Ch. Eigler
17:44 Re: C++ PATCH: Gabriel Dos Reis
17:40 Re: Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode Patrick McFarland
17:28 Re: C++ PATCH: Joe Buck
17:15 Re: C++ PATCH: Jason Merrill
17:15 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs Dylan Cuthbert
17:11 Re: How to get unused variable warning for non-PODs Joe Buck
16:54 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs Dylan Cuthbert
16:51 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs Dylan Cuthbert
16:50 Re: quetion for gcc on hpux dai yiyang
16:44 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs Dylan Cuthbert
16:41 Re: C++ PATCH: Mark Mitchell
16:37 Re: 16-bit real-mode code DJ Delorie
16:03 Re: Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode Florian Weimer
15:53 Re: C++ PATCH: Gabriel Dos Reis
15:00 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64? Richard Guenther
14:35 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs Richard Sandiford
13:57 Re: C++ PATCH: Neil Booth
12:27 Re: quetion for gcc on hpux Eljay Love-Jensen
11:58 Re: Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode Andrew Haley
11:49 Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode Patrick McFarland
10:28 quetion for gcc on hpux dai yiyang
10:14 gcse pass: expression hash table Tarun Kawatra
09:10 How to get unused variable warning for non-PODs "Richter, Jörg"
09:00 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd Paolo Bonzini
08:58 Re: C++ PATCH: Gabriel Dos Reis
08:40 16-bit real-mode code Josef Angermeier
06:01 Re: Problem in X Windows programming Joe Buck
05:36 a mudflap experiment on freebsd James E Wilson
04:16 Problem in X Windows programming bedabrata.chatterjee
02:36 Re: warning: conflicting types for built-in function %qD Joseph S. Myers
02:17 Re: warning: conflicting types for built-in function %qD Devang Patel

February 22, 2005
23:54 Successful build of 3.4.3 Stephen F. Booth
23:10 Re: RFC: objc_msgSend efficiency patch Richard Henderson
22:45 Re: Can gfortran compile fftw3? Andrew Pinski
22:33 Re: MIPS code generation bug... Eric Christopher
22:29 Re: MIPS code generation bug... Richard Sandiford
22:25 Re: MIPS code generation bug... David Daney
21:54 Re: Question about GCC 3.4.1 -O2 Optimization bug (i386 and rs6000) Vasanth
21:30 Re: Question about GCC 3.4.1 -O2 Optimization bug (i386 and rs6000) Andrew Pinski
21:29 Question about GCC 3.4.1 -O2 Optimization bug (i386 and rs6000) Vasanth
20:26 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs Dylan Cuthbert
20:09 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs James E Wilson
20:04 Re: Problem in GCC porting... James E Wilson
19:48 Re: Does backend need to worry about overlap? James E Wilson
19:43 Re: RFC: objc_msgSend efficiency patch Dale Johannesen
19:39 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs Dylan Cuthbert
19:33 Re: MMX built-ins performance oddities Richard Henderson
19:26 Re: RFC: objc_msgSend efficiency patch Kai Henningsen
19:20 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs James E Wilson
19:03 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs James E Wilson
18:59 DWARF Website Michael Eager
17:14 Re: Propagation of "pointer" attribute on registers Jeffrey A Law
16:57 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity Jeffrey A Law
15:53 Re: Default constructor and uninitialized const Jonathan Wakely
15:52 Re: Default constructor and uninitialized const Peter Seiderer
15:36 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs Dylan Cuthbert
15:35 Re: Default constructor and uninitialized const Paolo Carlini
15:32 Re: Default constructor and uninitialized const Peter Seiderer
15:25 Re: Default constructor and uninitialized const Paolo Carlini
15:20 Re: Default constructor and uninitialized const Peter Seiderer
15:03 Re: Default constructor and uninitialized const Paolo Carlini
14:58 Default constructor and uninitialized const Peter Seiderer
14:11 Re: C++ function pointer weirdness Gabriel Dos Reis
11:54 Re: How does g++ implement error handling? Nix
10:28 Re: Re, interworking problem Richard Earnshaw
10:13 Re, interworking problem aram bharathi
09:56 C++ function pointer weirdness Volker Reichelt
09:26 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs Dylan Cuthbert
09:22 Re: [RFA:] change back name of initial rtl dump suffix to ".rtl". Paolo Bonzini
09:11 Re: interworking problem Nick Clifton
05:45 Re: How does g++ implement error handling? Aaron W. LaFramboise
05:14 Re: __LDBL_MAX__ exceeds range of 'long double' James E Wilson
04:23 interworking problem aram bharathi
03:48 Re: TYPE_MIN_VALUE and pointer types James E Wilson
03:25 Re: gcc #pragma pack(push[,n]) target spesific ? James E Wilson
03:10 Re: Propagation of "pointer" attribute on registers James E Wilson
02:49 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0? Steve Kargl
02:31 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs James E Wilson
02:02 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0? Marcin Dalecki
01:45 Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs Richard Henderson
01:39 Re: RFC: objc_msgSend efficiency patch Mark Mitchell
01:27 Re: RFC: objc_msgSend efficiency patch Dale Johannesen
01:22 Re: RFC: objc_msgSend efficiency patch Mark Mitchell
01:06 RFC: objc_msgSend efficiency patch Dale Johannesen
00:36 Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs DJ Delorie
00:36 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity Mark Mitchell

February 21, 2005
23:26 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0? Steve Kargl
23:22 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0? Steve Kargl
23:22 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0? Tobias Schlüter
23:17 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0? Gerald Pfeifer
20:10 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity Jeffrey A Law
19:45 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Matt Rice
19:43 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity Kazu Hirata
19:02 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity Jeffrey A Law
18:35 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity Jeffrey A Law
18:26 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity Kazu Hirata
18:05 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity Steven Bosscher
17:44 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0? Steve Kargl
17:35 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0? Tobias Schlüter
17:23 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0? [was Re: Shipping gmp andmpfr with gcc-4.0?] Gerald Pfeifer
17:22 RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity Jeffrey A Law
16:56 Does backend need to worry about overlap? Andy Hutchinson
16:33 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs Dylan Cuthbert
16:12 Re: MMX built-ins performance oddities Prakash Punnoor
14:31 Re: [RFA:] change back name of initial rtl dump suffix to ".rtl". Gabriel Dos Reis
12:17 Re: Question regarding c++ constructors Jonathan Wakely
11:45 Question regarding c++ constructors Mile Davidovic
10:59 Re: [RFA:] change back name of initial rtl dump suffix to ".rtl". Steven Bosscher
10:52 Re: How does g++ implement error handling? Jonathan Wakely
10:40 Re: [RFA:] change back name of initial rtl dump suffix to ".rtl". Hans-Peter Nilsson
10:20 Re: [RFA:] change back name of initial rtl dump suffix to ".rtl". Paolo Bonzini
07:30 Re: MMX built-ins performance oddities Paolo Bonzini
04:33 How does g++ implement error handling? Euler Herbert

February 20, 2005
23:44 Re: MMX built-ins performance oddities Prakash Punnoor
18:05 gcc-4.0-20050220 is now available gccadmin

February 19, 2005
16:28 Will people install gfortran in 4.0? [was Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0?] Bradley Lucier
16:17 Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0? Eric Botcazou
16:13 Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0? Bradley Lucier
14:01 moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs Dylan Cuthbert
13:30 Re: MMX built-ins performance oddities Prakash Punnoor
13:24 Re: MMX built-ins performance oddities Andrew Pinski
13:21 MMX built-ins performance oddities Prakash Punnoor
11:34 Project submission for GCC 4.1 - AltiVec rewrite Paolo Bonzini
10:26 Re: [PATCH] Don't assume const/pure calls are total (fix PR tree-optimization/19828) Zdenek Dvorak
05:28 Re: Accessing the subversion repository Bob Proulx

February 18, 2005
23:41 gcc-3.4-20050218 is now available gccadmin
23:17 Re: LC_COLLATE Andreas Schwab
22:56 Re: LC_COLLATE Florian Weimer
22:23 Re: Major regression on mainline Steve Kargl
22:21 Re: Major regression on mainline Thomas Koenig
22:16 Re: Major regression on mainline Andrew Pinski
22:15 Re: Major regression on mainline Tobias Schlüter
22:12 Re: Major regression on mainline Thomas Koenig
19:28 Propagation of "pointer" attribute on registers Pat Haugen
18:16 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers Matt Austern
17:57 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers R. D. Flowers
17:30 Re: Ada totally borken on x86-linux Geert Bosch
17:17 Re: Ada totally borken on x86-linux Eric Botcazou
16:16 Re: Error while building gcc-3.4.3 ! Ian Lance Taylor
15:19 Re: OT: combinatorial source line swapper test Davide Rossetti
13:15 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers Paolo Carlini
12:05 Ada totally borken on x86-linux Laurent GUERBY
10:48 Re: Accessing the subversion repository Nix
07:52 Re: LC_COLLATE (was Re: SVN Test Repo updated) Paolo Bonzini
07:51 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers Matt Austern
07:33 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers Matt Austern
07:20 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers Matt Austern
07:16 Error while building gcc-3.4.3 ! Syed Shabir Zakiullah
06:48 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers Gabriel Dos Reis
06:44 The Linux binutils 2.15.94.0.2.2 is released H. J. Lu
01:26 Re: LC_COLLATE (was Re: SVN Test Repo updated) Vincent Lefevre
00:50 Re: LC_COLLATE (was Re: SVN Test Repo updated) Kai Henningsen
00:29 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers Joe Buck
00:24 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers Chris Jefferson
00:18 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers Joe Buck
00:17 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers Paolo Carlini
00:02 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers Benjamin Kosnik
00:02 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers Paolo Carlini
00:01 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers Mike Stump

February 17, 2005
23:54 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers Paolo Carlini
23:48 PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers Matt Austern
22:44 Re: OT: combinatorial source line swapper test Don Lindsay
22:12 Re: RFC: Appropriate method for target-specific mode-substititutes in libgcc2 Björn Haase
20:10 Re: OT: combinatorial source line swapper test Mike Stump
19:43 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Dorit Naishlos
19:02 Mostly successful build and install Scott Glass
18:54 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Mark Mitchell
18:20 Re: Quick Question Richard Henderson
17:52 OT: combinatorial source line swapper test Davide Rossetti
17:35 Re: __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries Andrew Haley
17:30 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Joe Buck
17:19 Re: GCC problem with using "-fprofile-arcs" Joe Buck
16:46 Re: g++ compile-time error with template arguments in 4.0 CVS? Benjamin Redelings I
16:40 gcc #pragma pack(push[,n]) target spesific ? Matthew J Fletcher
16:26 Quick Question Rajkishore Barik
15:30 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Daniel Berlin
15:10 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Vincent Lefevre
15:07 LC_COLLATE (was Re: SVN Test Repo updated) Paolo Bonzini
14:19 Re: __LDBL_MAX__ exceeds range of 'long double' Jonathan Wakely
14:14 Re: TYPE_MIN_VALUE and pointer types Richard Guenther
14:08 TYPE_MIN_VALUE and pointer types Paul Schlie
13:23 __LDBL_MAX__ exceeds range of 'long double' Jonathan Wakely
13:18 TYPE_MIN_VALUE and pointer types Richard Guenther
12:57 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Gerald Pfeifer
12:46 Re: Bug status in Bugzilla Giovanni Bajo
11:49 Bug status in Bugzilla Michael Cieslinski
11:48 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Marc Espie
11:25 RE: Accessing the subversion repository Andrew STUBBS
10:53 Problem in GCC porting... vivek
09:47 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1] Richard Guenther
09:15 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Vincent Lefevre
09:10 GCC problem with using "-fprofile-arcs" Wei . Feng
09:05 Added myself to MAINTAINERS (write after approval) Ira Rosen
08:56 Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0? Vincent Lefevre
05:34 Re: Major regression on mainline Steve Kargl
04:15 PATCH for Re: website correction Gerald Pfeifer
03:59 Re: Major regression on mainline Jason Merrill
02:30 Re: RFC: Appropriate method for target-specificmode-substititutesin libgcc2 Paul Schlie
02:25 Re: Major regression on mainline Steve Kargl
02:11 Re: RFC: Appropriate method for target-specific mode-substititutes in libgcc2 James E Wilson
01:49 Re: x86_64 - 128 bit structs not targeted to TImode: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZEtoo small? Michael Matz
01:42 Re: g++ compile-time error with template arguments in 4.0 CVS? Giovanni Bajo
01:09 Re: Problem in porting GLIBC... Ian Lance Taylor
01:01 Re: RFC: Appropriate method for target-specific mode-substititutesin libgcc2 James E Wilson
00:48 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Marc Espie
00:44 Re: Accessing the subversion repository Marc Espie
00:30 Re: ObjC++ Status ? Marcin Dalecki
00:19 Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0? Marcin Dalecki
00:19 x86_64 - 128 bit structs not targeted to TImode: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE too small? Gary Funck
00:17 Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0? Marcin Dalecki
00:14 Re: Major regression on mainline Jason Merrill

February 16, 2005
23:21 gcc-3.3-20050216 is now available gccadmin
23:13 Re: Major regression on mainline Steve Kargl
23:07 Re: ObjC++ Status ? Timothy J . Wood
22:44 Re: Major regression on mainline Jason Merrill
22:35 Major regression on mainline Steve Kargl
22:27 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Per Bothner
22:08 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Per Bothner
21:56 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Andreas Schwab
18:43 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1] Paul Schlie
18:15 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Daniel Berlin
18:04 ObjC++ Status ? Serguei Kouratov
17:59 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Vincent Lefevre
17:41 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Per Bothner
16:53 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1] Paul Schlie
16:50 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1] Jeffrey A Law
16:17 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1] Paul Schlie
15:52 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1] Andrew Pinski
15:50 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1] Theodore Papadopoulo
15:47 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Daniel Jacobowitz
15:11 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1] Paul Schlie
14:56 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1] Branko Äibej
14:43 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Joseph S. Myers
14:36 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Nathanael Nerode
13:31 Re: License text irregularity in gcc/config/mips/linux-unwind.h Nix
13:25 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1] Richard Guenther
13:00 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1] Paul Schlie
12:31 [RFH] Folding of &a[-1] Richard Guenther
11:33 Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0? Vincent Lefevre
11:28 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Neil Booth
11:17 Problem in porting GLIBC... vivek
07:11 Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0? Eric Botcazou
04:24 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Daniel Berlin
04:06 Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0? Bradley Lucier
00:19 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Robert Dewar
00:17 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Robert Dewar

February 15, 2005
23:54 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Joseph S. Myers
23:46 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Joe Buck
23:14 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsforsvn test repository) Daniel Berlin
23:04 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Mark Mitchell
23:01 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Neil Booth
22:55 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Tom Tromey
22:52 Re: C++ frontend generating bogous trees Richard Guenther
22:14 Want to sponsor Steve Kargl's "Write after approval" status. Toon Moene
21:40 Re: C++ frontend generating bogous trees Richard Guenther
21:39 Re: C++ frontend generating bogous trees Richard Guenther
21:29 Re: C++ frontend generating bogous trees Andrew Pinski
21:27 Re: C++ frontend generating bogous trees Richard Guenther
20:31 Re: Accessing the subversion repository Branko Äibej
20:20 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Andrew Haley
20:05 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Roger Sayle
20:00 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Mark Mitchell
19:52 Re: g++ compile-time error with template arguments in 4.0 CVS? Andrew Pinski
19:36 g++ compile-time error with template arguments in 4.0 CVS? Benjamin Redelings I
19:06 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Andrew Haley
18:22 Re: __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries Jakub Jelinek
18:03 Re: Accessing the subversion repository Christopher Faylor
18:02 Re: __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries Andrew Haley
18:02 C++ frontend generating bogous trees Richard Guenther
18:00 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Mark Mitchell
17:58 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Richard Kenner
17:46 Re: __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries Richard Henderson
17:44 Re: __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries Daniel Jacobowitz
17:41 Re: __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries Richard Henderson
17:29 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Mark Mitchell
17:27 __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries Andrew Haley
17:00 Re: pch on sparc64 David S. Miller
16:21 Re: Accessing the subversion repository Bob Proulx
16:05 RE: Accessing the subversion repository Daniel Berlin
15:59 RE: Accessing the subversion repository Andrew STUBBS
15:38 RE: Accessing the subversion repository Daniel Berlin
15:35 RE: Accessing the subversion repository Andrew STUBBS
14:56 Re: Accessing the subversion repository Daniel Berlin
14:50 Re: [PATCH]: Latent bug in value numbering (Was Re: latent bug inPRE?) Richard Guenther
14:46 [PATCH]: Latent bug in value numbering (Was Re: latent bug in PRE?) Daniel Berlin
12:36 Accessing the subversion repository Andrew STUBBS
10:31 Re: latent bug in PRE? Richard Guenther
10:17 latent bug in PRE? Richard Guenther
08:21 Re: Details for svn test repository Florian Weimer
03:09 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Joseph S. Myers
02:53 Re: problem James E Wilson
02:36 Re: [Q] initialisation of variable allocated wirh alloca in 'loop.c' James E Wilson
02:03 Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsforsvn test repository) Walter Landry
00:35 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin

February 14, 2005
23:59 Re: Details for svn test repository Marcin Dalecki
23:58 Re: SVN Test Repo updated Daniel Berlin
23:55 SVN Test Repo updated Daniel Berlin
23:32 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Mark Mitchell
23:25 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
23:19 Re: Details for svn test repository Geoffrey Keating
23:10 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Geoffrey Keating
22:35 Re: warning: conflicting types for built-in function %qD Joseph S. Myers
22:19 RFC: Appropriate method for target-specific mode-substititutes in libgcc2 Björn Haase
22:03 Re: warning: conflicting types for built-in function %qD Gabriel Dos Reis
21:08 Re: Merging GNU Classpath and gcc/libgcj bug databases Mark Wielaard
20:52 Profiling & nested functions Laurent GUERBY
20:22 Re: warning: conflicting types for built-in function %qD Joseph S. Myers
20:10 Re: Merging GNU Classpath and gcc/libgcj bug databases Chris Burdess
19:28 warning: conflicting types for built-in function %qD Matt Austern
19:04 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
18:52 Re: help regarding suif Bob Wilson
18:47 Re: Details for svn test repository Mike Stump
18:18 Re: Merging GNU Classpath and gcc/libgcj bug databases Joseph S. Myers
17:39 Re: Merging GNU Classpath and gcc/libgcj bug databases Joe Buck
17:12 Merging GNU Classpath and gcc/libgcj bug databases Mark Wielaard
16:58 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) - SMS improvements Mostafa Hagog
16:57 Su e-mail fue recibido, se responderŠ a la brevedad, gracias
16:39 Re: cc1 ICEs building libiberty/sort.c if built with gcc-3.4 -g Richard Guenther
16:37 Re: cc1 ICEs building libiberty/sort.c if built with gcc-3.4 -g Giovanni Bajo
16:23 cc1 ICEs building libiberty/sort.c if built with gcc-3.4 -g Richard Guenther
16:21 Re: fprintf symbol in libgcc of gcc 3.3 vs 4.0 Alexandre Oliva
15:21 Re: fprintf symbol in libgcc of gcc 3.3 vs 4.0 Nathan Sidwell
15:09 fprintf symbol in libgcc of gcc 3.3 vs 4.0 Jack Howarth
13:14 Re: temp obj created by compiler Marc Espie
12:16 Add myself to MAINTAINERS (write after approval) Razya Ladelsky
12:05 Re: Details for svn test repository Richard Earnshaw
09:28 Re: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions Peter Soetens
06:22 help regarding suif vivek sukumaran

February 13, 2005
23:38 [Q] initialisation of variable allocated wirh alloca in 'loop.c' Christophe Jaillet
22:59 Bootstrap of gcc-3.4.3 on Tru64 5.1B PR16787 Bill Northcott
18:05 gcc-4.0-20050213 is now available gccadmin
17:29 Re: Details for svn test repository Kai Henningsen
16:53 Re: Adding SMS as one of the changes for gcc-4.0? Giovanni Bajo
16:44 Re: Stack Checking implementation problems Hans-Peter Nilsson
10:00 problem Virender Kashyap
09:09 Re: Adding SMS as one of the changes for gcc-4.0? Steven Bosscher
09:07 Adding SMS as one of the changes for gcc-4.0? Mostafa Hagog
08:13 website correction Noah John
02:06 Re: adding new instruction Ian Lance Taylor
01:33 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Joe Buck

February 12, 2005
21:11 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Geert Bosch
20:53 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Richard Kenner
20:33 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Gabriel Dos Reis
20:11 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Geert Bosch
19:57 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Nathan Sidwell
19:48 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Geert Bosch
19:00 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Nathan Sidwell
18:47 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository) Daniel Berlin
18:38 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Mostafa Hagog
18:35 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Mostafa Hagog
17:57 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Nathan Sidwell
16:28 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Kazu Hirata
15:50 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Daniel Berlin
15:46 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Richard Guenther
15:31 Re: regression in ra ? Tommy Vercetti
15:26 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Roger Sayle
15:24 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Nathan Sidwell
15:04 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Kazu Hirata
14:12 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Andrew Haley
13:52 Re: regression in ra ? Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
13:44 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Nathan Sidwell
13:19 Re: regression in ra ? Tommy Vercetti
13:13 Re: regression in ra ? Steven Bosscher
12:25 regression in ra ? Tommy Vercetti
12:02 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Andi Kleen
10:46 adding new instruction aram bharathi
10:45 Re: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions Marcel Cox
05:48 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Andrew Pinski
05:06 [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan Kazu Hirata
04:56 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository) bd
04:43 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Details for svn test repository) Kevin Puetz
04:05 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository) Daniel Berlin
03:23 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository) bd
03:13 Re: Details for svn test repository bd
02:53 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
02:40 Re: Details for svn test repository Mike Stump
01:37 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
01:32 Re: Details for svn test repository Zack Weinberg
01:29 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
01:25 Re: Details for svn test repository Nathanael Nerode
00:25 RE: Global Reload Problem Gyle Yearsley
00:18 Re: 3.4.3 C++ parsing bug? Joe Buck
00:15 Trikke at the LA Marathon Trikke News
00:12 Trikke at the LA Marathon Trikke News

February 11, 2005
23:34 gcc-3.4-20050211 is now available gccadmin
22:38 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Thorsten Glaser
22:38 Re: 3.4.3 C++ parsing bug? Karel Gardas
22:34 Re: Details for svn test repository bd
22:30 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Joe Buck
22:21 Re: 3.4.3 C++ parsing bug? Joe Buck
22:03 Re: 3.4.3 C++ parsing bug? Karel Gardas
21:53 3.4.3 C++ parsing bug? Jan Reimers
21:40 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Joseph S. Myers
21:27 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
21:20 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Joseph S. Myers
21:15 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
21:03 Re: RFC: PR 19910 Daniel Berlin
20:57 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
20:47 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
20:43 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository) Daniel Berlin
20:39 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository) Daniel Berlin
20:38 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Thorsten Glaser
19:19 Re: Details for svn test repository Mike Stump
19:17 RFC: PR 19910 Dale Johannesen
18:59 Re: How to get m/c dependent attributes from RTL (expressions, not a variable)? James E Wilson
18:06 Re: Details for svn test repository Mike Stump
17:44 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository) Joern RENNECKE
17:34 Re: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions 'Jonathan Wakely'
17:24 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository) Richard Earnshaw
17:14 RE: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions Dave Korn
17:14 Re: Details for svn test repository Joern RENNECKE
17:12 Re: Details for svn test repository Florian Weimer
17:11 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository) Joern RENNECKE
17:08 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Details for svn test repository) Daniel Jacobowitz
17:05 Re: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions 'Jonathan Wakely'
17:00 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository) Daniel Berlin
16:59 RE: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions Dave Korn
16:58 Re: Details for svn test repository Joseph S. Myers
16:54 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
16:43 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository) Richard Earnshaw
16:35 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository) Joern RENNECKE
16:33 Re: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions Jonathan Wakely
16:32 Re: License text irregularity in gcc/config/mips/linux-unwind.h Jonathan Wakely
16:21 Re: Details for svn test repository Richard Guenther
16:17 Re: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions Peter Soetens
15:57 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic? Sam Lauber
15:50 Re: License text irregularity in gcc/config/mips/linux-unwind.h Sam Lauber
15:40 Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Details forsvn test repository) Daniel Berlin
15:38 Re: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions Sam Lauber
15:29 Re: Details for svn test repository Joern RENNECKE
14:40 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions Gabriel Dos Reis
14:31 Re: Details for svn test repository Kevin Puetz
14:28 Re: temp obj created by compiler san san
14:24 Re: temp obj created by compiler Jonathan Wakely
14:17 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
14:09 Re: temp obj created by compiler san san
14:05 Mixed working copies (Was Re: Details for svn test repository) Daniel Berlin
13:53 Re: temp obj created by compiler Jonathan Wakely
13:44 Re: temp obj created by compiler san san
13:28 Re: Details for svn test repository Joern RENNECKE
13:02 GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions Peter Soetens
10:37 Re: Details for svn test repository Richard Guenther
10:14 Re: Details for svn test repository Lars Segerlund
09:52 Re: Details for svn test repository Richard Earnshaw
07:06 Re: How to get m/c dependent attributes from RTL (expressions, nota variable)? Balaji S
06:24 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions Mark Mitchell
05:46 Re: Details for svn test repository Paul Schlie
05:10 Re: Details for svn test repository Kevin Puetz
05:00 Re: Details for svn test repository Marcin Dalecki
04:54 Re: Details for svn test repository Kevin Puetz
04:53 Re: Details for svn test repository Marcin Dalecki
04:47 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
04:43 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
04:33 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
04:15 Re: Details for svn test repository Marcin Dalecki
04:06 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
03:51 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
03:32 Re: Details for svn test repository Paul Schlie
03:26 Re: Empty vectors in RTL Richard Henderson
03:24 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
03:21 Re: Empty vectors in RTL Ian Lance Taylor
03:13 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
03:00 Re: Details for svn test repository Andrew Pinski
02:54 Re: Details for svn test repository Marcin Dalecki
02:24 Empty vectors in RTL Ian Lance Taylor
02:21 Re: Details for svn test repository Joseph S. Myers
02:07 Re: Details for svn test repository Richard Kenner
02:01 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
01:19 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
00:41 Re: Details for svn test repository Marcin Dalecki
00:34 Re: Details for svn test repository Mark Mitchell
00:13 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions Zack Weinberg
00:12 Re: Several levels of virtual inheritance: bug? Andrew Pinski
00:06 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions Janis Johnson

February 10, 2005
23:54 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions Zack Weinberg
23:50 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
23:47 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions Janis Johnson
23:47 Oops... ONE level of virtual inheritance. Benjamin Redelings I
23:46 Several levels of virtual inheritance: bug? Benjamin Redelings I
23:42 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
23:38 Re: Details for svn test repository Ian Lance Taylor
23:37 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
23:35 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions Mark Mitchell
23:31 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions Janis Johnson
23:29 Re: Details for svn test repository Mark Mitchell
23:26 Re: Details for svn test repository Ian Lance Taylor
23:25 Re: Details for svn test repository Mike Stump
23:24 Re: Details for svn test repository Mike Stump
23:21 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions Mark Mitchell
23:20 Re: Details for svn test repository Ian Lance Taylor
23:18 Re: Details for svn test repository Mark Mitchell
22:57 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
22:57 Re: 4.0 bug advice? : wrong virtual function called Joe Buck
22:46 Re: License text irregularity in gcc/config/mips/linux-unwind.h Mike Stump
22:40 Re: ObjC++ merge to the trunk: Can I help? Mike Stump
22:36 ACżL SATILIK birinci_el
22:30 Re: Details for svn test repository Joseph S. Myers
20:45 Die gewŁnschten Infos ArCon-open
20:35 4.0 bug advice? : wrong virtual function called Benjamin Redelings I
20:34 Re: License text irregularity in gcc/config/mips/linux-unwind.h Eric Christopher
20:10 Re: Details for svn test repository Joern RENNECKE
19:08 Re: Details for svn test repository Joern RENNECKE
18:41 Re: Details for svn test repository Joseph S. Myers
18:40 License text irregularity in gcc/config/mips/linux-unwind.h David Daney
18:28 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
18:22 Re: Details for svn test repository Joseph S. Myers
18:19 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
18:15 Re: Details for svn test repository Joern RENNECKE
18:12 Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/19078] [4.0 Regression] Poor quality code after loop unrolling. Richard Kenner
18:01 ObjC++ merge to the trunk: Can I help? Gregory John Casamento
18:01 Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/19078] [4.0 Regression] Poor qualitycode after loop unrolling. Jeffrey A Law
17:47 Re: Details for svn test repository Joseph S. Myers
17:32 Re: Bitwidth on register allocation Michael Matz
17:25 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic? Marcin Dalecki
17:22 Re: GCC Logical Addres Forming Nathan Sidwell
17:15 Re: GCC Logical Addres Forming Tristan Wibberley
17:12 Re: CCP confused by casts? Diego Novillo
16:56 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic? Andreas Schwab
16:47 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic? Tom Schutter
16:43 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic? Tom Schutter
16:42 GCC Logical Addres Forming Doron Bleiberg
16:41 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic? Tom Schutter
16:24 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
16:23 Re: fold_build Kazu Hirata
16:00 Re: fold_build Zdenek Dvorak
15:59 RE: Stack Checking implementation problems Jonah Graham
15:50 Re: fold_build Kazu Hirata
15:10 Bitwidth on register allocation Rajkishore Barik
14:57 Re: fold_build Roger Sayle
13:55 Re: temp obj created by compiler Jonathan Wakely
13:49 Re: temp obj created by compiler Jonathan Wakely
13:20 temp obj created by compiler san san
13:03 Re: Details for svn test repository Joseph S. Myers
12:52 Re: fold_build Paolo Bonzini
11:26 fold_build Zdenek Dvorak
11:12 Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/19078] [4.0 Regression] Poor quality code after loop unrolling. Zdenek Dvorak
10:22 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic? Andreas Schwab
09:39 CCP confused by casts? Richard Guenther
07:21 RE: mips g++ and __main? Mile Davidovic
04:55 Re: Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
03:34 Re: Details for svn test repository Kevin Puetz
03:26 Re: PUSH and POP next to first/last register use James E Wilson
03:12 Re: mips g++ and __main? James E Wilson
03:07 Re: How to get m/c dependent attributes from RTL (expressions, nota variable)? James E Wilson
02:36 Re: Stack Checking implementation problems James E Wilson
02:35 Re: Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.4.3 on Tru64 5.1B Bill Northcott
02:13 Re: Details for svn test repository Joseph S. Myers
02:05 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-02/ archive is hosed James E Wilson
01:57 Re: Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.4.3 on Tru64 5.1B Andrew Pinski
01:53 Re: Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.4.3 on Tru64 5.1B James E Wilson
00:57 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic? Dale Johannesen
00:55 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic? Andrew Pinski
00:51 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic? Giovanni Bajo
00:04 gcc-3.3-20050209 is now available gccadmin

February 09, 2005
23:19 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Steven Bosscher
23:11 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Mark Mitchell
23:06 Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic? Tom Schutter
23:01 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Gerald Pfeifer
22:26 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Mike Stump
21:52 Re: General question about types of tree expressions Paul Schlie
21:20 Re: General question about types of tree expressions Daniel Berlin
21:10 Re: General question about types of tree expressions Paul Schlie
21:07 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Steven Bosscher
21:00 RE: Global Reload Problem James E Wilson
20:26 Re: Another problem with PIC port, too many reloads for insn James E Wilson
19:30 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Tom Tromey
19:15 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions Mike Stump
19:01 Actual test results for 3.4.3 testsuite on alphaev56-dec-osf5.1 Bill Northcott
18:58 Re: General question about types of tree expressions Daniel Berlin
18:56 Re: gcc's autovectorizer tests Dorit Naishlos
18:51 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy). Joseph S. Myers
18:27 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets Zack Weinberg
18:02 Re: General question about types of tree expressions Jeffrey A Law
17:47 Re: PUSH and POP next to first/last register use Sami Khawam
17:43 Re: General question about types of tree expressions Paul Schlie
17:28 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions Janis Johnson
17:17 Re: General question about types of tree expressions Daniel Berlin
16:56 Re: General question about types of tree expressions Jeffrey A Law
16:50 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy). Vincent Lefevre
16:44 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets Mark Mitchell
16:37 Re: gcc's autovectorizer tests Paolo Bonzini
16:28 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy). Ian Lance Taylor
16:16 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy). Vincent Lefevre
15:09 Missed integer promotion for array_ref? Richard Guenther
15:09 gcc's autovectorizer tests Uros Bizjak
14:56 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Richard Guenther
14:53 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Zdenek Dvorak
14:46 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Richard Guenther
14:45 Re: General question about types of tree expressions Andrew Pinski
14:39 Re: General question about types of tree expressions Richard Guenther
14:34 Re: General question about types of tree expressions Andrew Pinski
14:25 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Andrew Pinski
14:21 Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu. Andrew Pinski
14:16 General question about types of tree expressions Richard Guenther
13:54 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Richard Guenther
13:46 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Zdenek Dvorak
13:35 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Richard Guenther
13:27 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Zdenek Dvorak
13:25 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Richard Guenther
13:22 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Zdenek Dvorak
13:22 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Zdenek Dvorak
13:21 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Richard Guenther
13:13 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Jakub Jelinek
13:12 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Richard Guenther
13:06 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Zdenek Dvorak
12:56 fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types Richard Guenther
12:24 Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu. Ulrich Weigand
12:06 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:30 Question about signedness of pointer offset calculations Richard Guenther
09:45 Re: mudflap assert Eyal Lebedinsky
08:35 Re: make -j lots building and testing gcc Bill Northcott
08:29 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets Richard Sandiford
07:33 Re: make -j lots building and testing gcc Zack Weinberg
07:07 make -j lots building and testing gcc Bill Northcott
06:32 Re: Test result email failure Andrew Pinski
05:12 Details for svn test repository Daniel Berlin
05:10 Re: Test result email failure Joe Buck
03:44 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
03:20 Re: Test result email failure Mike Stump
03:10 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets Zack Weinberg
03:10 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Joseph S. Myers
02:51 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets Mark Mitchell
02:43 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets Richard Henderson
02:10 Re: Test result email failure - got the answer Bill Northcott
02:03 Re: Test result email failure Bill Northcott
02:00 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets Mark Mitchell
01:54 Re: Test result email failure Bill Northcott
01:54 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets Mark Mitchell
01:52 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) David Edelsohn
01:48 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions Mike Stump
01:47 Re: glib/backtrace question muppet
01:41 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets David Edelsohn
01:39 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets Eric Christopher
01:36 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets Zack Weinberg
01:34 glib/backtrace question Brian Hanley
01:29 Re: Test result email failure Zack Weinberg
01:21 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets Mark Mitchell
01:12 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Marcin Dalecki
01:08 Re: Test result email failure Joe Buck
01:01 Re: Test result email failure Stan Shebs
00:48 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions Joe Buck
00:22 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Mark Mitchell
00:18 Re: Test result email failure Bill Northcott
00:14 C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions Janis Johnson
00:07 CSE insufficiency Luchezar Belev

February 08, 2005
23:42 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
23:40 Re: Test result email failure Joe Buck
23:35 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
23:28 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Steven Bosscher
23:21 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Ben Elliston
23:10 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Ben Elliston
23:02 Re: Test result email failure Bill Northcott
22:44 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
22:38 Re: Brigg's Regalloc Daniel Berlin
22:26 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Miles Bader
21:55 Brigg's Regalloc Rajkishore Barik
21:34 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Karel Gardas
21:11 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Steven Bosscher
21:11 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Andrew Pinski
21:10 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Florian Weimer
21:08 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Kai Henningsen
20:45 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
20:31 Re: When to ignore signed vs. unsigned comparison? Paul Schlie
19:56 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Joern RENNECKE
19:33 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Mike Stump
19:01 Re: Correctness question Florian Weimer
17:55 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Chris Jefferson
17:43 Re: When to ingore signed vs. unsigned comparison? Paul Schlie
17:37 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Frank Ch. Eigler
15:49 Re: Correctness question Richard Guenther
15:40 RE: Correctness question Dave Korn
15:31 GCC 3.43 build successful on HP-UX 11.00 700 series Dave Hamm
14:59 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
14:34 Re: Correctness question Richard Guenther
13:28 Re: Correctness question Florian Weimer
13:15 Correctness question Richard Guenther
12:50 Re: When to ingore signed vs. unsigned comparison? Joern RENNECKE
12:33 Re: When to ingore signed vs. unsigned comparison? Richard Guenther
12:12 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Gerald Pfeifer
11:20 When to ingore signed vs. unsigned comparison? Richard Guenther
08:34 gcc trunk failures on cygwin: fatal error: had to relocate PCH Christian Joensson
07:37 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Giovanni Bajo
06:53 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Steven Bosscher
06:25 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Miles Bader
06:15 Pong Patrick McFarland
04:17 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Walter Landry
03:57 Re: Test result email failure Daniel Jacobowitz
03:51 Re: Test result email failure Bill Northcott
03:01 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Sam Lauber
02:58 Re: Test result email failure Mike Stump
02:43 Re: Test result email failure Joe Buck
02:34 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
02:31 Re: Test result email failure Bill Northcott
02:30 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
02:22 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Joseph S. Myers
01:48 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Robert Dewar
01:41 Moving to an alternate VCS Walter Landry
01:22 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Tom Lord
01:03 Re: Test result email failure Mike Stump
00:45 Test result email failure Bill Northcott
00:16 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Giovanni Bajo

February 07, 2005
22:54 Re: Empty loop removal Steven Bosscher
22:36 Re: mudflap assert Eyal Lebedinsky
22:35 Re: Empty loop removal Zdenek Dvorak
22:32 Re: Empty loop removal Zdenek Dvorak
22:28 Re: Empty loop removal Steven Bosscher
22:23 Re: mudflap assert Eyal Lebedinsky
22:17 Empty loop removal Richard Guenther
21:42 PATCH for Re: new mirror Gerald Pfeifer
20:56 Re: mudflap assert Frank Ch. Eigler
20:32 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Jacobowitz
20:24 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Karel Gardas
19:16 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Florian Weimer
18:23 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Michael N. Moran
18:14 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Zack Weinberg
17:59 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Dale Johannesen
17:13 RE: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
17:13 Re: cgen? Frank Ch. Eigler
17:12 RE: Moving to an alternate VCS Bennett, Patrick
17:03 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Zack Weinberg
16:55 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Zack Weinberg
15:57 RE: Moving to an alternate VCS Bennett, Patrick
15:44 Re: web page problem Ian Lance Taylor
15:39 web page problem Stoian Spasov
13:44 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Marcin Dalecki
11:31 mudflap assert Eyal Lebedinsky
09:31 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Lars Segerlund
09:06 Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.4.3 on Tru64 5.1B Bill Northcott
08:31 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Lars Segerlund
06:41 cgen? Miles Bader
05:11 Re: C++ :: terminate called after throwing an instance of Raghu Annaluru
04:21 Re: mudflap problem Doug Graham
03:48 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Gabriel Dos Reis
03:24 Re: Where to get copyright papers ? Ian Lance Taylor
01:49 Re: Another problem with PIC port, too many reloads for insn Robert Baruch
01:14 Re: mudflap problem Frank Ch. Eigler
01:12 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Marcin Dalecki
00:56 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Gabriel Dos Reis
00:51 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Joseph S. Myers
00:50 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Gabriel Dos Reis
00:47 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Marcin Dalecki
00:43 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Joseph S. Myers
00:26 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Dale Johannesen
00:16 Re: some trampoline data Robert Dewar
00:13 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Robert Dewar
00:04 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Gabriel Dos Reis
00:03 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Gabriel Dos Reis

February 06, 2005
23:10 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Marcin Dalecki
23:10 Re: mudflap problem Frank Ch. Eigler
23:10 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Andrew Pinski
23:10 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc? Bill Northcott
23:09 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Marcin Dalecki
23:09 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Zack Weinberg
22:49 Where to get copyright papers ? Dimitri Gorokhovik
22:46 Re: mudflap problem Doug Graham
20:26 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Florian Weimer
19:46 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Zack Weinberg
19:36 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Robert Dewar
19:33 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Marcin Dalecki
19:21 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Marcin Dalecki
18:59 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Nix
18:47 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
18:47 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
18:43 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Marcin Dalecki
18:37 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Florian Weimer
18:30 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
18:24 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Ian Lance Taylor
18:23 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Patrick Bennett
18:21 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Thorsten Glaser
18:17 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Robert Dewar
18:17 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Joseph S. Myers
18:13 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Andrew Pinski
18:08 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Gabriel Dos Reis
18:08 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Patrick Bennett
17:44 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
17:39 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
17:34 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Thorsten Glaser
17:33 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Jonathan Wakely
17:31 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Thorsten Glaser
17:21 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Marcin Dalecki
17:19 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Laurent GUERBY
17:15 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
17:07 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Thorsten Glaser
16:33 Re: Can not connect to your site Nix
16:30 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-02/ archive is hosed Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
16:17 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Daniel Berlin
16:01 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Andrew Pinski
16:01 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Andrew Pinski
13:05 Re: optimisation question Andi Kleen
12:18 RE: Global Reload Problem Gyle Yearsley
12:17 Re: optimisation question Robert Dewar
12:17 Re: optimisation question Dale Johannesen
12:16 Re: mudflap problem Frank Ch. Eigler
12:16 Re: mudflap problem Doug Graham
12:15 C++ buggy code in debugging... Marcin Dalecki
12:15 Re: fold-const.c:7583ff x*x -> pow(x, 2) Toon Moene
12:14 Re: fold-const.c:7583ff x*x -> pow(x, 2) Robert Dewar
12:14 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Mark Mitchell
12:14 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Mike Stump
12:13 C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code Marcin Dalecki
12:13 Re: How to best fold __builtin_powi? Feng Wang
12:12 Re: mudflap problem Doug Graham
12:12 Re: mudflap problem Doug Graham
12:11 Re: scheduling cc0 Miles Bader
12:11 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(20050127) on MICO sources Karel Gardas
12:11 Re: scheduling cc0 Steven Bosscher
12:11 Re: scheduling cc0 Miles Bader
12:09 Pure mode young models love Nikki Sheldon
12:09 Stack Checking implementation problems Will Reece
12:08 How to get m/c dependent attributes from RTL (expressions, not avariable)? Balaji S
12:06 3.42 build successful on HP-UX 11.00 700 series Dave Hamm
12:05 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Daniel Berlin
12:05 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS Mark Mitchell
12:03 Re: How to best fold __builtin_powi? Richard Henderson
12:02 Re: problem cross-compiling gcc 3.4.3 from x86/linux to jf
12:00 Can not connect to your site BChikvash
11:57 Re: How to best fold __builtin_powi? Feng Wang
11:55 some trampoline data Marc Espie
11:45 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc? Gerald Pfeifer
10:19 Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets Richard Sandiford
09:41 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Zack Weinberg
07:11 GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) Mark Mitchell

February 02, 2005
17:26 Re: wiki Joe Buck
17:18 Re: scheduling cc0 Steven Bosscher
17:09 Re: scheduling cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
16:50 Re: scheduling cc0 Paul Schlie
16:29 Re: optimisation question Robert Dewar
16:11 Re: Mips question Ian Lance Taylor
16:05 RE: Mips question Mile Davidovic
15:56 How to best fold __builtin_powi? Richard Guenther
15:35 Re: Mips question Ian Lance Taylor
15:28 RE: Mips question Mile Davidovic
15:22 Re: wiki Daniel Berlin
15:16 Re: error: array type has incomplete element type Ralf Corsepius
15:02 x86 and redundant cc testings tbp
14:57 Re: Mips question Ian Lance Taylor
14:38 RE: optimisation question Dave Korn
14:31 Re: Triple name Ian Lance Taylor
14:17 RE: Triple name Mile Davidovic
14:04 Re: error: array type has incomplete element type Gabriel Dos Reis
14:00 Mips question Mile Davidovic
13:53 Re: optimisation question Robert Dewar
13:26 Re: optimisation question Andreas Schwab
13:12 Re: error: array type has incomplete element type Neil Booth
12:48 Re: optimisation question Robert Dewar
12:46 Re: optimisation question Robert Dewar
12:42 Re: error: array type has incomplete element type Joseph S. Myers
12:21 error: array type has incomplete element type Ralf Corsepius
11:56 Re: scheduling cc0 Miles Bader
11:40 Re: wiki Gerald Pfeifer
11:15 Re: scheduling cc0 Miles Bader
10:54 Re: wiki Jonathan Wakely
10:52 Re: scheduling cc0 Steven Bosscher
10:38 scheduling cc0 Miles Bader
10:16 Re: wiki Steven Bosscher
10:12 wiki Tomas Bily
09:12 Re: RFH/RFC: libgcc _Unwind_Backtrace falling off the end of FDElist... Richard Sandiford
08:21 Re: Enabling a target hook only from C-like front-ends Paolo Bonzini
02:08 Re: RFH/RFC: libgcc _Unwind_Backtrace falling off the end of FDE list... Richard Henderson
01:45 Re: optimisation question Ian Lance Taylor
01:08 Re: RFH/RFC: libgcc _Unwind_Backtrace falling off the end of FDElist... David Daney
00:16 The rest of the gcc.gnu.org/regtest/ regression tester scripts? Hans-Peter Nilsson

February 01, 2005
23:19 Re: doubts in adding new instruction James E Wilson
23:12 Re: Global Reload Problem James E Wilson
22:59 Re: optimisation question James E Wilson
22:54 Re: RFH/RFC: libgcc _Unwind_Backtrace falling off the end of FDE list... Richard Henderson
22:27 Re: Recent ia64 assembler change is incompatible with gcc 3.4 James E Wilson
21:57 Re: Recent ia64 assembler change is incompatible with gcc 3.4 H. J. Lu
21:27 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64? Richard Henderson
21:23 RFH/RFC: libgcc _Unwind_Backtrace falling off the end of FDE list... David Daney
20:56 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64? Andrew Pinski
20:55 Re: optimisation question Remy Martin
20:55 Re: Recent ia64 assembler change is incompatible with gcc 3.4 James E Wilson
20:49 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64? Steven Bosscher
20:45 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64? Joseph S. Myers
20:30 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64? Richard Henderson
19:49 Re: optimisation question Joe Buck
19:40 RE: optimisation question Remy Martin
19:37 Re: Triple name Ian Lance Taylor
18:55 Re: mudflap problem Doug Graham
18:41 RE: optimisation question Dave Korn
18:39 Re: optimisation question Remy X.O. Martin
17:26 Re: optimisation question Andreas Schwab
17:21 Re: optimisation question Remy X.O. Martin
16:39 RE: Triple name Mile Davidovic
16:30 Re: Triple name David Daney
16:20 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64? Richard Guenther
16:20 Re: Triple name Ian Lance Taylor
16:12 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64? Steven Bosscher
16:10 Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64? Richard Guenther
15:58 Enabling a target hook only from C-like front-ends Paolo Bonzini
12:30 Re: Bootstrap fails in libjava Ranjit Mathew
11:00 Bootstrap fails in libjava Andreas Schwab
10:53 Triple name Mile Davidovic
09:38 Re: problem cross-compiling gcc 3.4.3 from x86/linux to Roberto Fichera
06:06 Recent ia64 assembler change is incompatible with gcc 3.4 H. J. Lu
05:26 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0 (20050127) on MICO sources Andrew Pinski
02:50 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL James E Wilson
00:41 Global Reload Problem Gyle Yearsley
00:29 Re: tree-ssa-dom.c Bug or not? Jeffrey A Law
00:00 Re: optimisation question Marcin Dalecki


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3