gcc archive
author index for February, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

2005-02-14 16:57 Su e-mail fue recibido, se responderá a la brevedad, gracias

'Jonathan Wakely'

2005-02-11 17:05 Re: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions
2005-02-11 17:34 Re: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions

"Richter, Jörg"

2005-02-23 09:10 How to get unused variable warning for non-PODs

Björn Haase

2005-02-14 22:19 RFC: Appropriate method for target-specific mode-substititutes in libgcc2
2005-02-17 22:12 Re: RFC: Appropriate method for target-specific mode-substititutes in libgcc2

Tobias Schlüter

2005-02-18 22:15 Re: Major regression on mainline
2005-02-21 17:35 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0?
2005-02-21 23:22 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0?

Branko Äibej

2005-02-15 20:31 Re: Accessing the subversion repository
2005-02-16 14:56 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1]

Aaron W. LaFramboise

2005-02-22 05:45 Re: How does g++ implement error handling?

Alan Modra

2005-02-27 23:42 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build

Alexandre Oliva

2005-02-14 16:21 Re: fprintf symbol in libgcc of gcc 3.3 vs 4.0

Andi Kleen

2005-02-06 13:05 Re: optimisation question
2005-02-12 12:02 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS

Andreas Jaeger

2005-02-27 07:21 Re: Mainline java is broken

Andreas Schwab

2005-02-01 11:00 Bootstrap fails in libjava
2005-02-01 17:26 Re: optimisation question
2005-02-02 13:26 Re: optimisation question
2005-02-10 10:22 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic?
2005-02-10 16:56 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic?
2005-02-16 21:56 Re: SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-18 23:17 Re: LC_COLLATE
2005-02-23 20:14 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-23 21:41 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-24 00:09 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-27 21:20 Re: AMD64. sign extension correct?

Andrew Haley

2005-02-12 14:12 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-15 17:27 __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries
2005-02-15 18:02 Re: __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries
2005-02-15 19:06 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-15 20:20 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-17 17:35 Re: __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries
2005-02-23 11:58 Re: Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode
2005-02-24 13:57 Re: __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries

Andrew Pinski

2005-02-01 05:26 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0 (20050127) on MICO sources
2005-02-01 20:56 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64?
2005-02-06 16:01 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-06 16:01 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-06 18:13 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 23:10 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-08 21:11 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-09 06:32 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-09 14:21 Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu.
2005-02-09 14:25 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-09 14:34 Re: General question about types of tree expressions
2005-02-09 14:45 Re: General question about types of tree expressions
2005-02-10 00:55 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic?
2005-02-10 01:57 Re: Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.4.3 on Tru64 5.1B
2005-02-11 00:12 Re: Several levels of virtual inheritance: bug?
2005-02-11 03:00 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-12 05:48 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-15 19:52 Re: g++ compile-time error with template arguments in 4.0 CVS?
2005-02-15 21:29 Re: C++ frontend generating bogous trees
2005-02-16 15:52 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1]
2005-02-18 22:16 Re: Major regression on mainline
2005-02-19 13:24 Re: MMX built-ins performance oddities
2005-02-22 21:30 Re: Question about GCC 3.4.1 -O2 Optimization bug (i386 and rs6000)
2005-02-22 22:45 Re: Can gfortran compile fftw3?
2005-02-23 20:59 Re: C++ math optimization problem...
2005-02-24 15:13 Re: Bug in tree-inline.c:estimate_num_insns_1?
2005-02-24 21:15 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-25 12:56 Re: New C parser to be committed
2005-02-26 01:29 Re: RFA: dominator opts
2005-02-26 20:09 Re: Mainline java is broken
2005-02-27 22:42 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 22:47 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
2005-02-27 23:26 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-27 23:40 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
2005-02-28 00:04 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
2005-02-28 00:52 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-28 23:46 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects

Andrew STUBBS

2005-02-15 12:36 Accessing the subversion repository
2005-02-15 15:35 RE: Accessing the subversion repository
2005-02-15 15:59 RE: Accessing the subversion repository
2005-02-17 11:25 RE: Accessing the subversion repository

Andy Hutchinson

2005-02-21 16:56 Does backend need to worry about overlap?

aram bharathi

2005-02-12 10:46 adding new instruction
2005-02-22 04:23 interworking problem
2005-02-22 10:13 Re, interworking problem

ArCon-open

2005-02-10 20:45 Die gewünschten Infos

Balaji S

2005-02-06 12:08 How to get m/c dependent attributes from RTL (expressions, not avariable)?
2005-02-11 07:06 Re: How to get m/c dependent attributes from RTL (expressions, nota variable)?

BChikvash

2005-02-06 12:00 Can not connect to your site

2005-02-11 22:34 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-12 03:13 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-12 03:23 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository)
2005-02-12 04:56 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository)

bedabrata.chatterjee

2005-02-23 04:16 Problem in X Windows programming

Ben Elliston

2005-02-08 23:10 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 23:21 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS

Benjamin Herrenschmidt

2005-02-27 22:45 Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
2005-02-27 22:50 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
2005-02-27 22:58 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
2005-02-27 23:02 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
2005-02-27 23:50 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
2005-02-28 00:17 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
2005-02-28 01:01 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build

Benjamin Kosnik

2005-02-18 00:02 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers
2005-02-24 20:43 -Wfatal-errors=n

Benjamin Redelings I

2005-02-10 20:35 4.0 bug advice? : wrong virtual function called
2005-02-10 23:46 Several levels of virtual inheritance: bug?
2005-02-10 23:47 Oops... ONE level of virtual inheritance.
2005-02-15 19:36 g++ compile-time error with template arguments in 4.0 CVS?
2005-02-17 16:46 Re: g++ compile-time error with template arguments in 4.0 CVS?
2005-02-23 18:34 C++ math optimization problem...
2005-02-23 19:04 Re: C++ math optimization problem...
2005-02-25 00:05 Re: C++ math optimization problem...
2005-02-25 20:32 Richard's inlining-heuristics patch helps much

Bennett, Patrick

2005-02-07 15:57 RE: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-07 17:12 RE: Moving to an alternate VCS

Bernd Jendrissek

2005-02-25 15:29 Re: GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC?
2005-02-28 18:23 Re: 16-bit real-mode code

Bernd Schmidt

2005-02-28 12:04 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros

Biagio Lucini

2005-02-24 14:04 Benchmark of gcc 4.0
2005-02-24 16:09 Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0
2005-02-24 16:31 Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0

Bill Northcott

2005-02-06 23:10 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the current release gcc?
2005-02-07 09:06 Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.4.3 on Tru64 5.1B
2005-02-08 00:45 Test result email failure
2005-02-08 02:31 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-08 03:51 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-08 23:02 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-09 00:18 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-09 01:54 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-09 02:03 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-09 02:10 Re: Test result email failure - got the answer
2005-02-09 07:07 make -j lots building and testing gcc
2005-02-09 08:35 Re: make -j lots building and testing gcc
2005-02-09 19:01 Actual test results for 3.4.3 testsuite on alphaev56-dec-osf5.1
2005-02-10 02:35 Re: Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.4.3 on Tru64 5.1B
2005-02-13 22:59 Bootstrap of gcc-3.4.3 on Tru64 5.1B PR16787

birinci_el

2005-02-10 22:36 ACýL SATILIK

Bob Proulx

2005-02-15 16:21 Re: Accessing the subversion repository
2005-02-19 05:28 Re: Accessing the subversion repository

Bob Wilson

2005-02-14 18:52 Re: help regarding suif

Bradley Lucier

2005-02-16 04:06 Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0?
2005-02-19 16:13 Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0?
2005-02-19 16:28 Will people install gfortran in 4.0? [was Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0?]

Brian Hanley

2005-02-09 01:34 glib/backtrace question

Canqun Yang

2005-02-28 13:20 GIV optimizations

Chris Burdess

2005-02-14 20:10 Re: Merging GNU Classpath and gcc/libgcj bug databases

Chris Jefferson

2005-02-08 17:55 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-18 00:24 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers
2005-02-27 12:15 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns

Christian Joensson

2005-02-08 08:34 gcc trunk failures on cygwin: fatal error: had to relocate PCH

Christophe Jaillet

2005-02-13 23:38 [Q] initialisation of variable allocated wirh alloca in 'loop.c'

Christopher Faylor

2005-02-15 18:03 Re: Accessing the subversion repository

Claus-Justus Heine

2005-02-27 20:50 AMD64. sign extension correct?

dai yiyang

2005-02-23 10:28 quetion for gcc on hpux
2005-02-23 16:50 Re: quetion for gcc on hpux

Dale Johannesen

2005-02-06 12:17 Re: optimisation question
2005-02-07 00:26 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-07 17:59 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-10 00:57 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic?
2005-02-11 19:17 RFC: PR 19910
2005-02-22 01:06 RFC: objc_msgSend efficiency patch
2005-02-22 01:27 Re: RFC: objc_msgSend efficiency patch
2005-02-22 19:43 Re: RFC: objc_msgSend efficiency patch
2005-02-25 18:12 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects)
2005-02-26 01:24 RFA: dominator opts
2005-02-26 01:44 Re: RFA: dominator opts
2005-02-27 16:23 Re: Extension compatibility policy
2005-02-27 21:16 Re: Extension compatibility policy
2005-02-28 18:01 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects)
2005-02-28 18:36 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects)

Daniel Berlin

2005-02-02 15:22 Re: wiki
2005-02-06 12:05 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 16:17 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-06 17:15 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 17:39 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 17:44 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 18:30 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 18:47 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 18:47 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-07 17:13 RE: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 02:30 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 02:34 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 14:59 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 20:45 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 22:38 Re: Brigg's Regalloc
2005-02-08 22:44 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 23:35 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 23:42 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-09 03:44 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-09 05:12 Details for svn test repository
2005-02-09 17:17 Re: General question about types of tree expressions
2005-02-09 18:58 Re: General question about types of tree expressions
2005-02-09 21:20 Re: General question about types of tree expressions
2005-02-10 04:55 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 16:24 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 18:19 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 18:28 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 22:57 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 23:37 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 23:42 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 23:50 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 01:19 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 02:01 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 03:13 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 03:24 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 03:51 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 04:06 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 04:33 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 04:43 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 04:47 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 14:05 Mixed working copies (Was Re: Details for svn test repository)
2005-02-11 14:17 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 15:40 Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Details forsvn test repository)
2005-02-11 16:54 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 17:00 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository)
2005-02-11 20:39 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository)
2005-02-11 20:43 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository)
2005-02-11 20:47 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 20:57 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 21:03 Re: RFC: PR 19910
2005-02-11 21:15 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 21:27 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-12 01:29 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-12 01:37 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-12 02:53 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-12 04:05 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository)
2005-02-12 15:50 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-12 18:47 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository)
2005-02-14 19:04 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-14 23:25 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-14 23:55 SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-14 23:58 Re: SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-15 00:35 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-15 14:46 [PATCH]: Latent bug in value numbering (Was Re: latent bug in PRE?)
2005-02-15 14:56 Re: Accessing the subversion repository
2005-02-15 15:38 RE: Accessing the subversion repository
2005-02-15 16:05 RE: Accessing the subversion repository
2005-02-15 23:14 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsforsvn test repository)
2005-02-16 04:24 Re: SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-16 18:15 Re: SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-17 15:30 Re: SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-24 21:22 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-24 21:44 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-25 19:58 Bugs updated from 4.0 regression to 4.1 regression
2005-02-26 18:55 SVN plans update
2005-02-28 00:01 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects

Daniel Jacobowitz

2005-02-07 20:32 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 03:57 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-11 17:08 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Details for svn test repository)
2005-02-15 17:44 Re: __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries
2005-02-16 15:47 Re: SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-23 21:40 Re: C++ -fno-weak with template instantiations
2005-02-23 21:55 Re: C++ -fno-weak with template instantiations
2005-02-23 22:10 Re: C++ -fno-weak with template instantiations
2005-02-25 00:16 Re: -Ttext with -mthumb causes relocation truncated to fit
2005-02-25 22:23 Re: Should mainline be 5.0/4.1?
2005-02-27 00:03 Re: gcc leaking?
2005-02-27 23:17 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-28 00:56 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects

Davda, Bhavesh P \(Bhavesh\)

2005-02-23 21:34 C++ -fno-weak with template instantiations
2005-02-23 21:50 RE: C++ -fno-weak with template instantiations
2005-02-23 22:00 RE: C++ -fno-weak with template instantiations

Dave Hamm

2005-02-06 12:06 3.42 build successful on HP-UX 11.00 700 series
2005-02-08 15:31 GCC 3.43 build successful on HP-UX 11.00 700 series

Dave Korn

2005-02-01 18:41 RE: optimisation question
2005-02-02 14:38 RE: optimisation question
2005-02-08 15:40 RE: Correctness question
2005-02-11 16:59 RE: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions
2005-02-11 17:14 RE: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions
2005-02-25 18:43 RE: GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC?
2005-02-28 14:08 RE: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
2005-02-28 14:08 RE: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
2005-02-28 18:00 RE: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
2005-02-28 18:00 RE: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros

David Daney

2005-02-01 16:30 Re: Triple name
2005-02-01 21:23 RFH/RFC: libgcc _Unwind_Backtrace falling off the end of FDE list...
2005-02-02 01:08 Re: RFH/RFC: libgcc _Unwind_Backtrace falling off the end of FDElist...
2005-02-10 18:40 License text irregularity in gcc/config/mips/linux-unwind.h
2005-02-22 22:25 Re: MIPS code generation bug...

David Edelsohn

2005-02-09 01:41 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets
2005-02-09 01:52 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-24 14:57 Re: Is 'mfcr' a legal opcode for RS6000 RIOS1?
2005-02-27 22:54 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
2005-02-27 23:37 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
2005-02-27 23:54 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-27 23:56 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
2005-02-28 00:33 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build

David S. Miller

2005-02-15 17:00 Re: pch on sparc64

David Starner

2005-02-26 22:55 Decimal Floating-Point

Davide Rossetti

2005-02-17 17:52 OT: combinatorial source line swapper test
2005-02-18 15:19 Re: OT: combinatorial source line swapper test

Denis Zaitsev

2005-02-26 18:43 gcc-3.4.4-20050211: maybe a danger behaviour

Devang Patel

2005-02-23 02:17 Re: warning: conflicting types for built-in function %qD
2005-02-23 17:56 Re: warning: conflicting types for built-in function %qD
2005-02-27 19:49 Re: Extension compatibility policy
2005-02-28 02:51 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects

Diego Novillo

2005-02-10 17:12 Re: CCP confused by casts?
2005-02-28 23:41 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-28 23:52 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-28 23:52 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects

Dimitri Gorokhovik

2005-02-06 22:49 Where to get copyright papers ?

DJ Delorie

2005-02-22 00:36 Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs
2005-02-23 16:37 Re: 16-bit real-mode code
2005-02-24 00:59 Re: 16-bit real-mode code
2005-02-28 18:30 Re: 16-bit real-mode code

Don Lindsay

2005-02-17 22:44 Re: OT: combinatorial source line swapper test

Dorit Naishlos

2005-02-09 18:56 Re: gcc's autovectorizer tests
2005-02-17 19:43 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)

Doron Bleiberg

2005-02-10 16:42 GCC Logical Addres Forming

Doug Graham

2005-02-01 18:55 Re: mudflap problem
2005-02-06 12:12 Re: mudflap problem
2005-02-06 12:12 Re: mudflap problem
2005-02-06 12:16 Re: mudflap problem
2005-02-06 22:46 Re: mudflap problem
2005-02-07 04:21 Re: mudflap problem
2005-02-23 19:17 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd

Dylan Cuthbert

2005-02-19 14:01 moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
2005-02-21 16:33 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
2005-02-22 09:26 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
2005-02-22 15:36 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
2005-02-22 19:39 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
2005-02-22 20:26 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
2005-02-23 16:44 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
2005-02-23 16:51 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
2005-02-23 16:54 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
2005-02-23 17:15 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs

Earl Chew

2005-02-24 17:57 Seeking patch for bug in lifetime of __cur in deque::_M_fill_initialize(powerpc dw2 EH gcc 3.4.2)

Eljay Love-Jensen

2005-02-23 12:27 Re: quetion for gcc on hpux

Eric Botcazou

2005-02-16 07:11 Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0?
2005-02-18 17:17 Re: Ada totally borken on x86-linux
2005-02-19 16:17 Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0?
2005-02-27 07:38 Re: Extension compatibility policy

Eric Christopher

2005-02-09 01:39 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets
2005-02-10 20:34 Re: License text irregularity in gcc/config/mips/linux-unwind.h
2005-02-22 22:33 Re: MIPS code generation bug...

Etienne Lorrain

2005-02-24 06:30 Re: 16-bit real-mode code

Euler Herbert

2005-02-21 04:33 How does g++ implement error handling?

Eyal Lebedinsky

2005-02-07 11:31 mudflap assert
2005-02-07 22:23 Re: mudflap assert
2005-02-07 22:36 Re: mudflap assert
2005-02-09 09:45 Re: mudflap assert

Falk Hueffner

2005-02-27 21:07 Re: AMD64. sign extension correct?

Fariborz Jahanian

2005-02-25 20:51 patch [RFC] Simple loop runs out of stack at -O1
2005-02-25 21:23 Re: patch [RFC] Simple loop runs out of stack at -O1

Feng Wang

2005-02-06 11:57 Re: How to best fold __builtin_powi?
2005-02-06 12:13 Re: How to best fold __builtin_powi?

Florian Weimer

2005-02-06 18:37 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 20:26 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-07 19:16 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 13:28 Re: Correctness question
2005-02-08 19:01 Re: Correctness question
2005-02-08 21:10 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-11 17:12 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-15 08:21 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-18 22:56 Re: LC_COLLATE
2005-02-23 16:03 Re: Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode

Frank Ch. Eigler

2005-02-06 12:16 Re: mudflap problem
2005-02-06 23:10 Re: mudflap problem
2005-02-07 01:14 Re: mudflap problem
2005-02-07 17:13 Re: cgen?
2005-02-07 20:56 Re: mudflap assert
2005-02-08 17:37 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-23 17:49 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd

Fredrik Hugosson

2005-02-24 09:41 Feature request: Globalize symbol

Gabriel Dos Reis

2005-02-02 14:04 Re: error: array type has incomplete element type
2005-02-06 18:08 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-07 00:03 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-07 00:04 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-07 00:50 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-07 00:56 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-07 03:48 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-11 14:40 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions
2005-02-12 20:33 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-14 22:03 Re: warning: conflicting types for built-in function %qD
2005-02-18 06:48 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers
2005-02-21 14:31 Re: [RFA:] change back name of initial rtl dump suffix to ".rtl".
2005-02-22 14:11 Re: C++ function pointer weirdness
2005-02-23 08:58 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-23 15:53 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-23 17:44 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-23 17:55 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-23 19:24 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-23 19:28 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-23 19:33 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-23 19:45 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-23 23:29 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-23 23:30 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-23 23:34 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-24 02:38 Apology (was: Re: C++ PATCH:)
2005-02-27 17:22 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 22:53 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 23:01 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 23:08 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-28 02:18 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-28 02:22 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns

gan_xiao_jun

2005-02-26 16:02 about gcc -XLinker -M
2005-02-27 02:50 RE:about gcc -XLinker -M

Gary Funck

2005-02-17 00:19 x86_64 - 128 bit structs not targeted to TImode: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE too small?
2005-02-26 18:35 IA64 record alignment rules, and modes?

gccadmin

2005-02-10 00:04 gcc-3.3-20050209 is now available
2005-02-11 23:34 gcc-3.4-20050211 is now available
2005-02-13 18:05 gcc-4.0-20050213 is now available
2005-02-16 23:21 gcc-3.3-20050216 is now available
2005-02-18 23:41 gcc-3.4-20050218 is now available
2005-02-20 18:05 gcc-4.0-20050220 is now available
2005-02-23 23:49 gcc-3.3-20050223 is now available
2005-02-26 00:00 gcc-3.4-20050225 is now available
2005-02-26 23:50 gcc-4.0-20050226 is now available
2005-02-27 18:26 gcc-4.1-20050227 is now available

Geert Bosch

2005-02-12 19:48 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-12 20:11 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-12 21:11 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-18 17:30 Re: Ada totally borken on x86-linux

Geoffrey Keating

2005-02-14 23:10 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-14 23:19 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-28 19:21 Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build

Gerald Pfeifer

2005-02-02 11:40 Re: wiki
2005-02-06 11:45 Re: Apple specific options: patch to include them in the currentrelease gcc?
2005-02-07 21:42 PATCH for Re: new mirror
2005-02-08 12:12 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-09 23:01 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-17 04:15 PATCH for Re: website correction
2005-02-17 12:57 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-21 17:23 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0? [was Re: Shipping gmp andmpfr with gcc-4.0?]
2005-02-21 23:17 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0?
2005-02-23 18:22 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0?
2005-02-23 20:20 PATCH for Re: DWARF Website
2005-02-24 15:39 Change in treelang maintainership
2005-02-24 18:07 Re: [wwwdocs] CVS annotate brings me to GNATS

Giovanni Bajo

2005-02-08 00:16 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 07:37 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-10 00:51 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic?
2005-02-13 16:53 Re: Adding SMS as one of the changes for gcc-4.0?
2005-02-14 16:37 Re: cc1 ICEs building libiberty/sort.c if built with gcc-3.4 -g
2005-02-17 01:42 Re: g++ compile-time error with template arguments in 4.0 CVS?
2005-02-17 12:46 Re: Bug status in Bugzilla
2005-02-28 00:36 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-28 00:46 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-28 11:19 Re: Extension compatibility policy
2005-02-28 11:35 Re: Extension compatibility policy

Gregory John Casamento

2005-02-10 18:01 ObjC++ merge to the trunk: Can I help?

Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz

2005-02-12 13:52 Re: regression in ra ?

Gyle Yearsley

2005-02-01 00:41 Global Reload Problem
2005-02-06 12:18 RE: Global Reload Problem
2005-02-12 00:25 RE: Global Reload Problem

H. J. Lu

2005-02-01 06:06 Recent ia64 assembler change is incompatible with gcc 3.4
2005-02-01 21:57 Re: Recent ia64 assembler change is incompatible with gcc 3.4
2005-02-18 06:44 The Linux binutils 2.15.94.0.2.2 is released
2005-02-25 22:22 Should mainline be 5.0/4.1?

Hans-Peter Nilsson

2005-02-02 00:16 The rest of the gcc.gnu.org/regtest/ regression tester scripts?
2005-02-09 12:06 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions
2005-02-13 16:44 Re: Stack Checking implementation problems
2005-02-21 10:40 Re: [RFA:] change back name of initial rtl dump suffix to ".rtl".
2005-02-28 14:30 RE: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros

Helge Bahmann

2005-02-28 15:50 Constant pointer to (member) function, indirect call

Ian Lance Taylor

2005-02-01 16:20 Re: Triple name
2005-02-01 19:37 Re: Triple name
2005-02-02 01:45 Re: optimisation question
2005-02-02 14:31 Re: Triple name
2005-02-02 14:57 Re: Mips question
2005-02-02 15:35 Re: Mips question
2005-02-02 16:11 Re: Mips question
2005-02-02 17:09 Re: scheduling cc0
2005-02-06 18:24 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-07 03:24 Re: Where to get copyright papers ?
2005-02-07 15:44 Re: web page problem
2005-02-09 16:28 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).
2005-02-10 23:20 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 23:26 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 23:38 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 02:24 Empty vectors in RTL
2005-02-11 03:21 Re: Empty vectors in RTL
2005-02-13 02:06 Re: adding new instruction
2005-02-17 01:09 Re: Problem in porting GLIBC...
2005-02-18 16:16 Re: Error while building gcc-3.4.3 !

Ira Rosen

2005-02-17 09:05 Added myself to MAINTAINERS (write after approval)

Jack Howarth

2005-02-14 15:09 fprintf symbol in libgcc of gcc 3.3 vs 4.0

Jakub Jelinek

2005-02-09 13:13 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-15 18:22 Re: __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries
2005-02-23 18:02 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-28 12:53 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects)

James E Wilson

2005-02-01 02:50 Re: Accessing IP on IA-64 with RTL
2005-02-01 20:55 Re: Recent ia64 assembler change is incompatible with gcc 3.4
2005-02-01 22:27 Re: Recent ia64 assembler change is incompatible with gcc 3.4
2005-02-01 22:59 Re: optimisation question
2005-02-01 23:12 Re: Global Reload Problem
2005-02-01 23:19 Re: doubts in adding new instruction
2005-02-09 20:26 Re: Another problem with PIC port, too many reloads for insn
2005-02-09 21:00 RE: Global Reload Problem
2005-02-10 01:53 Re: Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.4.3 on Tru64 5.1B
2005-02-10 02:05 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-02/ archive is hosed
2005-02-10 02:36 Re: Stack Checking implementation problems
2005-02-10 03:07 Re: How to get m/c dependent attributes from RTL (expressions, nota variable)?
2005-02-10 03:12 Re: mips g++ and __main?
2005-02-10 03:26 Re: PUSH and POP next to first/last register use
2005-02-11 18:59 Re: How to get m/c dependent attributes from RTL (expressions, not a variable)?
2005-02-15 02:36 Re: [Q] initialisation of variable allocated wirh alloca in 'loop.c'
2005-02-15 02:53 Re: problem
2005-02-17 01:01 Re: RFC: Appropriate method for target-specific mode-substititutesin libgcc2
2005-02-17 02:11 Re: RFC: Appropriate method for target-specific mode-substititutes in libgcc2
2005-02-22 02:31 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
2005-02-22 03:10 Re: Propagation of "pointer" attribute on registers
2005-02-22 03:25 Re: gcc #pragma pack(push[,n]) target spesific ?
2005-02-22 03:48 Re: TYPE_MIN_VALUE and pointer types
2005-02-22 05:14 Re: __LDBL_MAX__ exceeds range of 'long double'
2005-02-22 19:03 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
2005-02-22 19:20 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
2005-02-22 19:48 Re: Does backend need to worry about overlap?
2005-02-22 20:04 Re: Problem in GCC porting...
2005-02-22 20:09 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
2005-02-23 05:36 a mudflap experiment on freebsd
2005-02-23 19:37 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd
2005-02-23 19:48 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd
2005-02-23 20:31 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-24 00:18 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-24 20:02 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-24 20:04 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-24 20:16 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-24 21:26 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table

Jan Hubicka

2005-02-24 15:09 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-26 22:03 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 10:33 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 13:58 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 14:01 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 16:30 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns

Jan Reimers

2005-02-11 21:53 3.4.3 C++ parsing bug?

Janis Johnson

2005-02-09 00:14 C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions
2005-02-09 17:28 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions
2005-02-10 23:31 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions
2005-02-10 23:47 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions
2005-02-11 00:06 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions
2005-02-23 19:08 GCC Summit deadline approaching
2005-02-24 17:24 Re: Suggestion: Different exit code for ICE

Jason Merrill

2005-02-16 22:44 Re: Major regression on mainline
2005-02-17 00:14 Re: Major regression on mainline
2005-02-17 03:59 Re: Major regression on mainline
2005-02-23 17:15 Re: C++ PATCH:

Jeffrey A Law

2005-02-01 00:29 Re: tree-ssa-dom.c Bug or not?
2005-02-09 16:56 Re: General question about types of tree expressions
2005-02-09 18:02 Re: General question about types of tree expressions
2005-02-10 18:01 Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/19078] [4.0 Regression] Poor qualitycode after loop unrolling.
2005-02-16 16:50 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1]
2005-02-21 17:22 RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity
2005-02-21 18:35 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity
2005-02-21 19:02 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity
2005-02-21 20:10 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity
2005-02-22 16:57 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity
2005-02-22 17:14 Re: Propagation of "pointer" attribute on registers
2005-02-28 16:37 Re: A question about DOM
2005-02-28 17:24 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph?
2005-02-28 18:14 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects)

2005-02-06 12:02 Re: problem cross-compiling gcc 3.4.3 from x86/linux to

Joe Buck

2005-02-01 19:49 Re: optimisation question
2005-02-02 17:26 Re: wiki
2005-02-08 02:43 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-08 23:40 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-09 00:48 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions
2005-02-09 01:08 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-09 05:10 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-10 22:57 Re: 4.0 bug advice? : wrong virtual function called
2005-02-11 22:21 Re: 3.4.3 C++ parsing bug?
2005-02-11 22:30 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-12 00:18 Re: 3.4.3 C++ parsing bug?
2005-02-13 01:33 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-14 17:39 Re: Merging GNU Classpath and gcc/libgcj bug databases
2005-02-15 23:46 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-17 17:19 Re: GCC problem with using "-fprofile-arcs"
2005-02-17 17:30 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-18 00:18 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers
2005-02-18 00:29 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers
2005-02-23 06:01 Re: Problem in X Windows programming
2005-02-23 17:11 Re: How to get unused variable warning for non-PODs
2005-02-23 17:28 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-23 18:01 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd
2005-02-25 21:16 Re: patch [RFC] Simple loop runs out of stack at -O1

Joern RENNECKE

2005-02-08 12:50 Re: When to ingore signed vs. unsigned comparison?
2005-02-08 19:56 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-10 18:15 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 19:08 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 20:10 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 13:28 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 15:29 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 16:35 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository)
2005-02-11 17:11 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository)
2005-02-11 17:14 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 17:44 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository)
2005-02-25 17:48 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects)
2005-02-28 12:43 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects)
2005-02-28 18:19 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects)
2005-02-28 20:09 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects)

Johan Bergman \(KI/EAB\)

2005-02-28 20:58 http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html

John Steele Scott

2005-02-27 23:43 building Microchip's pic30 dsPIC version of binutils and GCC

Jonah Graham

2005-02-10 15:59 RE: Stack Checking implementation problems

Jonathan Wakely

2005-02-02 10:54 Re: wiki
2005-02-06 17:33 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-10 13:49 Re: temp obj created by compiler
2005-02-10 13:55 Re: temp obj created by compiler
2005-02-11 13:53 Re: temp obj created by compiler
2005-02-11 14:24 Re: temp obj created by compiler
2005-02-11 16:32 Re: License text irregularity in gcc/config/mips/linux-unwind.h
2005-02-11 16:33 Re: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions
2005-02-17 13:23 __LDBL_MAX__ exceeds range of 'long double'
2005-02-17 14:19 Re: __LDBL_MAX__ exceeds range of 'long double'
2005-02-21 10:52 Re: How does g++ implement error handling?
2005-02-21 12:17 Re: Question regarding c++ constructors
2005-02-22 15:53 Re: Default constructor and uninitialized const

Josef Angermeier

2005-02-23 08:40 16-bit real-mode code
2005-02-28 09:13 Re: 16-bit real-mode code

Joseph S. Myers

2005-02-01 20:45 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64?
2005-02-02 12:42 Re: error: array type has incomplete element type
2005-02-06 18:17 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-07 00:43 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-07 00:51 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-08 02:22 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-09 03:10 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-09 18:51 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).
2005-02-10 02:13 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 13:03 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 17:47 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 18:22 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 18:41 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 22:30 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 02:21 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 16:58 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 21:20 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-11 21:40 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-14 18:18 Re: Merging GNU Classpath and gcc/libgcj bug databases
2005-02-14 20:22 Re: warning: conflicting types for built-in function %qD
2005-02-14 22:35 Re: warning: conflicting types for built-in function %qD
2005-02-15 03:09 Re: SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-15 23:54 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-16 14:43 Re: SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-23 02:36 Re: warning: conflicting types for built-in function %qD
2005-02-23 22:58 Re: RFC: Separate correctness and optimization tests
2005-02-25 11:29 New C parser to be committed
2005-02-25 23:21 Re: New C parser to be committed
2005-02-27 12:48 Re: Extension compatibility policy
2005-02-27 14:32 Re: Extension compatibility policy

Kai Henningsen

2005-02-08 21:08 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-13 17:29 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-18 00:50 Re: LC_COLLATE (was Re: SVN Test Repo updated)
2005-02-22 19:26 Re: RFC: objc_msgSend efficiency patch

Kai Ruottu

2005-02-24 11:30 Is 'mfcr' a legal opcode for RS6000 RIOS1?

Karel Gardas

2005-02-06 12:11 Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(20050127) on MICO sources
2005-02-07 20:24 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 21:34 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-11 22:03 Re: 3.4.3 C++ parsing bug?
2005-02-11 22:38 Re: 3.4.3 C++ parsing bug?

Kazu Hirata

2005-02-10 15:50 Re: fold_build
2005-02-10 16:23 Re: fold_build
2005-02-12 05:06 [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-12 15:04 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-12 16:28 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-21 18:26 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity
2005-02-21 19:43 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity
2005-02-27 23:16 A question about DOM
2005-02-28 14:41 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
2005-02-28 19:59 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros

Kevin Puetz

2005-02-10 03:34 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 04:54 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 05:10 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 14:31 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-12 04:43 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Details for svn test repository)

Lars Segerlund

2005-02-07 08:31 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-07 09:31 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-11 10:14 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-25 12:54 Re: New C parser to be committed

Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf

2005-02-06 16:30 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-02/ archive is hosed
2005-02-28 11:41 Question about ObjC++ state

Laurent GUERBY

2005-02-06 17:19 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-14 20:52 Profiling & nested functions
2005-02-18 12:05 Ada totally borken on x86-linux
2005-02-28 12:11 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-28 21:27 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects

Luchezar Belev

2005-02-09 00:07 CSE insufficiency

M Ranga Swami Reddy

2005-02-25 13:49 GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

Marc Espie

2005-02-06 11:55 some trampoline data
2005-02-14 13:14 Re: temp obj created by compiler
2005-02-17 00:44 Re: Accessing the subversion repository
2005-02-17 00:48 Re: SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-17 11:48 Re: SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-27 14:02 Re: Extension compatibility policy
2005-02-28 12:28 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-28 15:00 Re: Extension compatibility policy

Marcel Cox

2005-02-12 10:45 Re: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions

Marcin Dalecki

2005-02-01 00:00 Re: optimisation question
2005-02-06 12:13 C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-06 12:15 C++ buggy code in debugging...
2005-02-06 17:21 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-06 18:43 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 19:21 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 19:33 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-06 23:09 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-06 23:10 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-07 00:47 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-07 01:12 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-07 13:44 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-09 01:12 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-10 17:25 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic?
2005-02-11 00:41 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 02:54 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 04:15 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 04:53 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 05:00 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-14 23:59 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-17 00:17 Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0?
2005-02-17 00:19 Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0?
2005-02-17 00:30 Re: ObjC++ Status ?
2005-02-22 02:02 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0?
2005-02-23 18:07 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-23 21:19 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-25 14:14 Re: New C parser to be committed
2005-02-25 19:40 Re: GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC?
2005-02-27 17:12 Re: SVN plans update
2005-02-27 23:29 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 23:29 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 23:29 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns

Mark Hahn

2005-02-27 17:22 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns

Mark Mitchell

2005-02-06 07:11 GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-06 12:05 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 12:14 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-09 00:22 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-09 01:21 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets
2005-02-09 01:54 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets
2005-02-09 02:00 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets
2005-02-09 02:51 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets
2005-02-09 16:44 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets
2005-02-09 23:11 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-10 23:18 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 23:21 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions
2005-02-10 23:29 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 23:35 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions
2005-02-11 00:34 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 06:24 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions
2005-02-14 23:32 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-15 17:29 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-15 18:00 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-15 20:00 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-15 23:04 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-17 18:54 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-22 00:36 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity
2005-02-22 01:22 Re: RFC: objc_msgSend efficiency patch
2005-02-22 01:39 Re: RFC: objc_msgSend efficiency patch
2005-02-23 16:41 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-23 18:03 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-24 17:59 Re: Suggestion: Different exit code for ICE
2005-02-24 18:30 Quick 4.0 status update
2005-02-25 08:43 Mainline frozen
2005-02-25 09:09 Re: -Ttext with -mthumb causes relocation truncated to fit
2005-02-25 09:51 GCC 4.0 Branch
2005-02-25 09:52 GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-25 17:34 Re: -Ttext with -mthumb causes relocation truncated to fit
2005-02-25 20:46 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-27 21:41 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 22:23 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 22:46 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-27 22:57 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-27 22:59 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 23:56 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-27 23:57 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-28 00:24 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-28 01:24 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-28 02:03 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-28 02:04 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-28 23:49 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects

Mark Wielaard

2005-02-14 17:12 Merging GNU Classpath and gcc/libgcj bug databases
2005-02-14 21:08 Re: Merging GNU Classpath and gcc/libgcj bug databases

Matt Austern

2005-02-14 19:28 warning: conflicting types for built-in function %qD
2005-02-17 23:48 PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers
2005-02-18 07:20 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers
2005-02-18 07:33 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers
2005-02-18 07:51 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers
2005-02-18 18:16 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers

Matt Rice

2005-02-21 19:45 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)

Matthew J Fletcher

2005-02-17 16:40 gcc #pragma pack(push[,n]) target spesific ?

Michael Cieslinski

2005-02-17 11:49 Bug status in Bugzilla
2005-02-23 20:54 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd

Michael Eager

2005-02-22 18:59 DWARF Website

Michael Matz

2005-02-10 17:32 Re: Bitwidth on register allocation
2005-02-17 01:49 Re: x86_64 - 128 bit structs not targeted to TImode: MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZEtoo small?

Michael N. Moran

2005-02-07 18:23 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS

Michael Rosellini

2005-02-28 18:59 Mach-O and C++ static template definitions

Mike Hearn

2005-02-26 19:50 Extension compatibility policy
2005-02-27 20:49 Re: Extension compatibility policy

Mike Stump

2005-02-06 12:14 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 01:03 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-08 02:58 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-08 19:33 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-09 01:48 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions
2005-02-09 03:20 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-09 19:15 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions
2005-02-09 22:26 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-10 22:40 Re: ObjC++ merge to the trunk: Can I help?
2005-02-10 22:46 Re: License text irregularity in gcc/config/mips/linux-unwind.h
2005-02-10 23:24 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-10 23:25 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 18:06 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 19:19 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-12 02:40 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-14 18:47 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-17 20:10 Re: OT: combinatorial source line swapper test
2005-02-18 00:01 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers

Mile Davidovic

2005-02-01 10:53 Triple name
2005-02-01 16:39 RE: Triple name
2005-02-02 14:00 Mips question
2005-02-02 14:17 RE: Triple name
2005-02-02 15:28 RE: Mips question
2005-02-02 16:05 RE: Mips question
2005-02-10 07:21 RE: mips g++ and __main?
2005-02-21 11:45 Question regarding c++ constructors

Miles Bader

2005-02-02 10:38 scheduling cc0
2005-02-02 11:15 Re: scheduling cc0
2005-02-02 11:56 Re: scheduling cc0
2005-02-06 12:11 Re: scheduling cc0
2005-02-06 12:11 Re: scheduling cc0
2005-02-07 06:41 cgen?
2005-02-08 06:25 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 22:26 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS

Mostafa Hagog

2005-02-12 18:35 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-12 18:38 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-13 09:07 Adding SMS as one of the changes for gcc-4.0?
2005-02-14 16:58 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03) - SMS improvements

muppet

2005-02-09 01:47 Re: glib/backtrace question

Nathan Sidwell

2005-02-10 17:22 Re: GCC Logical Addres Forming
2005-02-12 13:44 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-12 15:24 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-12 17:57 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-12 19:00 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-12 19:57 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-14 15:21 Re: fprintf symbol in libgcc of gcc 3.3 vs 4.0
2005-02-25 20:44 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-27 13:27 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects

Nathanael Nerode

2005-02-12 01:25 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-16 14:36 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-23 22:17 RFC: Separate correctness and optimization tests
2005-02-26 19:13 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-26 19:25 Web page still claims mainline frozen
2005-02-28 23:31 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-28 23:46 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects

Neil Booth

2005-02-02 13:12 Re: error: array type has incomplete element type
2005-02-15 23:01 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-16 11:28 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-23 13:57 Re: C++ PATCH:
2005-02-23 22:33 Re: C++ PATCH:

Nicholas Nethercote

2005-02-24 01:20 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd

Nick Clifton

2005-02-22 09:11 Re: interworking problem

Nikki Sheldon

2005-02-06 12:09 Pure mode young models love

Nix

2005-02-06 16:33 Re: Can not connect to your site
2005-02-06 18:59 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-16 13:31 Re: License text irregularity in gcc/config/mips/linux-unwind.h
2005-02-18 10:48 Re: Accessing the subversion repository
2005-02-22 11:54 Re: How does g++ implement error handling?

Noah John

2005-02-13 08:13 website correction

Paolo Bonzini

2005-02-01 15:58 Enabling a target hook only from C-like front-ends
2005-02-02 08:21 Re: Enabling a target hook only from C-like front-ends
2005-02-09 16:37 Re: gcc's autovectorizer tests
2005-02-10 12:52 Re: fold_build
2005-02-17 15:07 LC_COLLATE (was Re: SVN Test Repo updated)
2005-02-18 07:52 Re: LC_COLLATE (was Re: SVN Test Repo updated)
2005-02-19 11:34 Project submission for GCC 4.1 - AltiVec rewrite
2005-02-21 07:30 Re: MMX built-ins performance oddities
2005-02-21 10:20 Re: [RFA:] change back name of initial rtl dump suffix to ".rtl".
2005-02-22 09:22 Re: [RFA:] change back name of initial rtl dump suffix to ".rtl".
2005-02-23 09:00 Re: a mudflap experiment on freebsd
2005-02-24 15:52 Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0
2005-02-28 08:35 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-28 08:36 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects

Paolo Carlini

2005-02-17 23:54 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers
2005-02-18 00:02 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers
2005-02-18 00:17 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers
2005-02-18 13:15 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers
2005-02-22 15:03 Re: Default constructor and uninitialized const
2005-02-22 15:25 Re: Default constructor and uninitialized const
2005-02-22 15:35 Re: Default constructor and uninitialized const

Pat Haugen

2005-02-18 19:28 Propagation of "pointer" attribute on registers

Patrick Bennett

2005-02-06 18:08 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 18:23 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS

Patrick McFarland

2005-02-08 06:15 Pong
2005-02-23 11:49 Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode
2005-02-23 17:40 Re: Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode
2005-02-23 17:56 Re: Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode

Paul Brook

2005-02-26 18:30 Re: GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC?

Paul Schlie

2005-02-02 16:50 Re: scheduling cc0
2005-02-08 17:43 Re: When to ingore signed vs. unsigned comparison?
2005-02-08 20:31 Re: When to ignore signed vs. unsigned comparison?
2005-02-09 17:43 Re: General question about types of tree expressions
2005-02-09 21:10 Re: General question about types of tree expressions
2005-02-09 21:52 Re: General question about types of tree expressions
2005-02-11 03:32 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 05:46 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-16 13:00 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1]
2005-02-16 15:11 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1]
2005-02-16 16:17 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1]
2005-02-16 16:53 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1]
2005-02-16 18:43 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1]
2005-02-17 02:30 Re: RFC: Appropriate method for target-specificmode-substititutesin libgcc2
2005-02-17 14:08 TYPE_MIN_VALUE and pointer types
2005-02-25 03:12 what's the proper way to configure/enable/disable C exceptionhandling?
2005-02-26 13:37 which trapping operation integer types are required in libgcc2 ?
2005-02-27 16:24 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-28 17:10 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
2005-02-28 18:42 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros

Per Bothner

2005-02-16 17:41 Re: SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-16 22:08 Re: SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-16 22:27 Re: SVN Test Repo updated

Peter Seiderer

2005-02-22 14:58 Default constructor and uninitialized const
2005-02-22 15:20 Re: Default constructor and uninitialized const
2005-02-22 15:32 Re: Default constructor and uninitialized const
2005-02-22 15:52 Re: Default constructor and uninitialized const

Peter Soetens

2005-02-11 13:02 GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions
2005-02-11 16:17 Re: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions
2005-02-14 09:28 Re: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions

Phil Edwards

2005-02-28 17:22 Re: Slightly OT: We should move #gcc off of FreeNode

Prakash Punnoor

2005-02-19 13:21 MMX built-ins performance oddities
2005-02-19 13:30 Re: MMX built-ins performance oddities
2005-02-20 23:44 Re: MMX built-ins performance oddities
2005-02-21 16:12 Re: MMX built-ins performance oddities

R. D. Flowers

2005-02-18 17:57 Re: PATCH: TR1 unordered associative containers
2005-02-28 14:55 Proposed high_indirection switch

Raghu Annaluru

2005-02-07 05:11 Re: C++ :: terminate called after throwing an instance of

Rajkishore Barik

2005-02-08 21:55 Brigg's Regalloc
2005-02-10 15:10 Bitwidth on register allocation
2005-02-17 16:26 Quick Question

Ralf Corsepius

2005-02-02 12:21 error: array type has incomplete element type
2005-02-02 15:16 Re: error: array type has incomplete element type

Ranjit Deshpande

2005-02-25 21:46 __builtin_frame_address on MIPS

Ranjit Mathew

2005-02-01 12:30 Re: Bootstrap fails in libjava

Razya Ladelsky

2005-02-14 12:16 Add myself to MAINTAINERS (write after approval)

Remy Martin

2005-02-01 19:40 RE: optimisation question
2005-02-01 20:55 Re: optimisation question

Remy X.O. Martin

2005-02-01 17:21 Re: optimisation question
2005-02-01 18:39 Re: optimisation question

Richard Earnshaw

2005-02-11 09:52 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 16:43 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository)
2005-02-11 17:24 Re: Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsfor svn test repository)
2005-02-14 12:05 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-22 10:28 Re: Re, interworking problem

Richard Guenther

2005-02-01 16:10 Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64?
2005-02-01 16:20 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64?
2005-02-02 15:56 How to best fold __builtin_powi?
2005-02-07 22:17 Empty loop removal
2005-02-08 11:20 When to ingore signed vs. unsigned comparison?
2005-02-08 12:33 Re: When to ingore signed vs. unsigned comparison?
2005-02-08 13:15 Correctness question
2005-02-08 14:34 Re: Correctness question
2005-02-08 15:49 Re: Correctness question
2005-02-09 11:30 Question about signedness of pointer offset calculations
2005-02-09 12:56 fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-09 13:12 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-09 13:21 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-09 13:25 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-09 13:35 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-09 13:54 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-09 14:16 General question about types of tree expressions
2005-02-09 14:39 Re: General question about types of tree expressions
2005-02-09 14:46 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-09 14:56 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-09 15:09 Missed integer promotion for array_ref?
2005-02-10 09:39 CCP confused by casts?
2005-02-11 10:37 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-11 16:21 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-12 15:46 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-14 16:23 cc1 ICEs building libiberty/sort.c if built with gcc-3.4 -g
2005-02-14 16:39 Re: cc1 ICEs building libiberty/sort.c if built with gcc-3.4 -g
2005-02-15 10:17 latent bug in PRE?
2005-02-15 10:31 Re: latent bug in PRE?
2005-02-15 14:50 Re: [PATCH]: Latent bug in value numbering (Was Re: latent bug inPRE?)
2005-02-15 18:02 C++ frontend generating bogous trees
2005-02-15 21:27 Re: C++ frontend generating bogous trees
2005-02-15 21:39 Re: C++ frontend generating bogous trees
2005-02-15 21:40 Re: C++ frontend generating bogous trees
2005-02-15 22:52 Re: C++ frontend generating bogous trees
2005-02-16 12:31 [RFH] Folding of &a[-1]
2005-02-16 13:25 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1]
2005-02-17 09:47 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1]
2005-02-17 13:18 TYPE_MIN_VALUE and pointer types
2005-02-17 14:14 Re: TYPE_MIN_VALUE and pointer types
2005-02-23 15:00 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64?
2005-02-24 10:29 Re: C++ math optimization problem...
2005-02-24 12:58 Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-24 13:24 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-24 15:07 Bug in tree-inline.c:estimate_num_insns_1?
2005-02-24 15:24 Re: Bug in tree-inline.c:estimate_num_insns_1?
2005-02-24 16:06 Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0
2005-02-24 16:31 Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0
2005-02-24 19:07 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-24 19:45 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-26 23:20 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-26 23:23 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 01:06 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 09:57 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 10:33 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 11:40 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 12:43 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 13:54 How to choose reasonable default inlining limits?
2005-02-27 14:12 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 14:21 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 15:55 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 16:57 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 22:14 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 22:28 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-28 08:50 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-28 09:25 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-28 16:08 No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph?

Richard Henderson

2005-02-01 20:30 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64?
2005-02-01 21:27 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64?
2005-02-01 22:54 Re: RFH/RFC: libgcc _Unwind_Backtrace falling off the end of FDE list...
2005-02-02 02:08 Re: RFH/RFC: libgcc _Unwind_Backtrace falling off the end of FDE list...
2005-02-06 12:03 Re: How to best fold __builtin_powi?
2005-02-09 02:43 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets
2005-02-11 03:26 Re: Empty vectors in RTL
2005-02-15 17:41 Re: __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries
2005-02-15 17:46 Re: __register_frame_info and unwinding shared libraries
2005-02-17 18:20 Re: Quick Question
2005-02-22 01:45 Re: computation_cost too blind to hard regs
2005-02-22 19:33 Re: MMX built-ins performance oddities
2005-02-22 23:10 Re: RFC: objc_msgSend efficiency patch

Richard Kenner

2005-02-10 18:12 Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/19078] [4.0 Regression] Poor quality code after loop unrolling.
2005-02-11 02:07 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-12 20:53 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-15 17:58 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-28 02:31 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects

Richard Sandiford

2005-02-02 09:12 Re: RFH/RFC: libgcc _Unwind_Backtrace falling off the end of FDElist...
2005-02-06 10:19 Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets
2005-02-09 08:29 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets
2005-02-22 22:29 Re: MIPS code generation bug...
2005-02-23 14:35 Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
2005-02-26 07:53 Re: __builtin_frame_address on MIPS
2005-02-27 13:28 Re: IA64 record alignment rules, and modes?
2005-02-28 15:14 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros

Robert Baruch

2005-02-07 01:49 Re: Another problem with PIC port, too many reloads for insn

Robert Dewar

2005-02-02 12:46 Re: optimisation question
2005-02-02 12:48 Re: optimisation question
2005-02-02 13:53 Re: optimisation question
2005-02-02 16:29 Re: optimisation question
2005-02-06 12:14 Re: fold-const.c:7583ff x*x -> pow(x, 2)
2005-02-06 12:17 Re: optimisation question
2005-02-06 18:17 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 19:36 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-07 00:13 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-07 00:16 Re: some trampoline data
2005-02-08 01:48 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-16 00:17 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-16 00:19 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-26 23:19 Re: Decimal Floating-Point
2005-02-27 11:43 Re: Extension compatibility policy
2005-02-27 14:20 Re: Extension compatibility policy
2005-02-27 15:09 Re: Extension compatibility policy
2005-02-28 14:24 Re: Extension compatibility policy

Roberto Fichera

2005-02-01 09:38 Re: problem cross-compiling gcc 3.4.3 from x86/linux to

Rogelio M . Serrano Jr .

2005-02-25 12:00 Re: New C parser to be committed
2005-02-25 12:59 Re: New C parser to be committed
2005-02-25 17:35 hacking frameworks for linux
2005-02-26 03:41 Re: reinventing frameworks in gnu toolchain (fwd)

Roger Sayle

2005-02-10 14:57 Re: fold_build
2005-02-12 15:26 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-15 20:05 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan

Sachin Sonawane

2005-02-26 08:40 Help : Instruction Scheduling

Sam Lauber

2005-02-08 03:01 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-11 15:38 Re: GCC 3.3.5: -march=i586 does not use all pentium FPU instructions
2005-02-11 15:50 Re: License text irregularity in gcc/config/mips/linux-unwind.h
2005-02-11 15:57 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic?
2005-02-24 00:53 Re: 16-bit real-mode code
2005-02-24 16:29 Re: Suggestion: Different exit code for ICE
2005-02-25 04:05 GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC?
2005-02-26 02:38 Re: GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC?
2005-02-26 17:57 Re: GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC?

Sami Khawam

2005-02-09 17:47 Re: PUSH and POP next to first/last register use

san san

2005-02-10 13:20 temp obj created by compiler
2005-02-11 13:44 Re: temp obj created by compiler
2005-02-11 14:09 Re: temp obj created by compiler
2005-02-11 14:28 Re: temp obj created by compiler

Scott Glass

2005-02-17 19:02 Mostly successful build and install

Serguei Kouratov

2005-02-16 18:04 ObjC++ Status ?

Shaun Jackman

2005-02-24 23:02 mthumb in specs file
2005-02-24 23:23 -Ttext with -mthumb causes relocation truncated to fit
2005-02-25 00:18 Specifying a linker script from the specs file
2005-02-25 16:26 Re: -Ttext with -mthumb causes relocation truncated to fit

Stan Shebs

2005-02-09 01:01 Re: Test result email failure

Stefan Strasser

2005-02-23 20:49 Re: C++ math optimization problem...
2005-02-23 21:29 Re: C++ math optimization problem...
2005-02-26 18:51 gcc leaking?
2005-02-26 23:56 Re: gcc leaking?

stelios xanthakis

2005-02-25 18:12 optimize cold partitions for size? (4.1)

Stephen F. Booth

2005-02-22 23:54 Successful build of 3.4.3

Steve Ellcey

2005-02-28 16:32 Re: IA64 record alignment rules, and modes?

Steve Kargl

2005-02-16 22:35 Major regression on mainline
2005-02-16 23:13 Re: Major regression on mainline
2005-02-17 02:25 Re: Major regression on mainline
2005-02-17 05:34 Re: Major regression on mainline
2005-02-18 22:23 Re: Major regression on mainline
2005-02-21 17:44 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0?
2005-02-21 23:22 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0?
2005-02-21 23:26 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0?
2005-02-22 02:49 Re: Will people install gfortran in 4.0?
2005-02-26 04:14 testsuite execution question

Steven Bosscher

2005-02-01 16:12 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64?
2005-02-01 20:49 Re: Bootstrap broken on debian/amd64?
2005-02-02 10:16 Re: wiki
2005-02-02 10:52 Re: scheduling cc0
2005-02-02 17:18 Re: scheduling cc0
2005-02-06 12:11 Re: scheduling cc0
2005-02-07 22:28 Re: Empty loop removal
2005-02-07 22:54 Re: Empty loop removal
2005-02-08 06:53 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 21:11 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 23:28 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-09 21:07 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-09 23:19 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-12 13:13 Re: regression in ra ?
2005-02-13 09:09 Re: Adding SMS as one of the changes for gcc-4.0?
2005-02-21 10:59 Re: [RFA:] change back name of initial rtl dump suffix to ".rtl".
2005-02-21 18:05 Re: RFC -- CSE compile-time stupidity
2005-02-24 11:16 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-24 13:15 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-24 21:26 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-24 21:29 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-25 13:49 Re: New C parser to be committed
2005-02-25 14:04 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-25 17:40 Re: CVS problem
2005-02-26 19:44 Mainline java is broken
2005-02-26 22:27 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 01:29 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 10:46 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 11:51 Re: Mainline java is broken
2005-02-27 14:07 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-27 22:30 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-28 01:18 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-28 14:08 Re: GIV optimizations
2005-02-28 20:56 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
2005-02-28 23:44 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects

Stoian Spasov

2005-02-07 15:39 web page problem

Syed Shabir Zakiullah

2005-02-18 07:16 Error while building gcc-3.4.3 !

Tarun Kawatra

2005-02-23 10:14 gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-24 10:14 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-24 17:21 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-24 20:56 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-24 21:25 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-24 21:31 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-24 21:32 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table
2005-02-24 23:13 Re: gcse pass: expression hash table

tbp

2005-02-02 15:02 x86 and redundant cc testings

Ted Teah via RT

2005-02-28 15:45 [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

Theodore Papadopoulo

2005-02-16 15:50 Re: [RFH] Folding of &a[-1]

Thomas Koenig

2005-02-18 22:12 Re: Major regression on mainline
2005-02-18 22:21 Re: Major regression on mainline

Thorsten Glaser

2005-02-06 17:07 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 17:31 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 17:34 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-06 18:21 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-11 20:38 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-11 22:38 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS

Timothy J . Wood

2005-02-16 23:07 Re: ObjC++ Status ?

Tom Lord

2005-02-08 01:22 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS

Tom Schutter

2005-02-09 23:06 Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic?
2005-02-10 16:41 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic?
2005-02-10 16:43 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic?
2005-02-10 16:47 Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic?

Tom Tromey

2005-02-09 19:30 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-15 22:55 Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan
2005-02-23 19:26 Re: C++ PATCH:

Tomas Bily

2005-02-02 10:12 wiki

Tommy Vercetti

2005-02-12 12:25 regression in ra ?
2005-02-12 13:19 Re: regression in ra ?
2005-02-12 15:31 Re: regression in ra ?
2005-02-26 22:27 Re: gcc leaking?

Toon Moene

2005-02-06 12:15 Re: fold-const.c:7583ff x*x -> pow(x, 2)
2005-02-15 22:14 Want to sponsor Steve Kargl's "Write after approval" status.
2005-02-26 12:43 Re: GNU INTERCAL front-end for GCC?

Trikke News

2005-02-12 00:12 Trikke at the LA Marathon
2005-02-12 00:15 Trikke at the LA Marathon

Tristan Wibberley

2005-02-10 17:15 Re: GCC Logical Addres Forming

Ulrich Weigand

2005-02-09 12:24 Re: Bootstrap of trunk fails with Ada on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu.

Uros Bizjak

2005-02-09 15:09 gcc's autovectorizer tests
2005-02-25 07:46 Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0

Vasanth

2005-02-22 21:29 Question about GCC 3.4.1 -O2 Optimization bug (i386 and rs6000)
2005-02-22 21:54 Re: Question about GCC 3.4.1 -O2 Optimization bug (i386 and rs6000)

Vincent Lefevre

2005-02-09 16:16 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).
2005-02-09 16:50 Re: Floating point problems (accuracy).
2005-02-16 11:33 Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0?
2005-02-16 17:59 Re: SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-17 08:56 Re: Shipping gmp and mpfr with gcc-4.0?
2005-02-17 09:15 Re: SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-17 15:10 Re: SVN Test Repo updated
2005-02-18 01:26 Re: LC_COLLATE (was Re: SVN Test Repo updated)

Virender Kashyap

2005-02-13 10:00 problem

vivek

2005-02-16 11:17 Problem in porting GLIBC...
2005-02-17 10:53 Problem in GCC porting...

vivek sukumaran

2005-02-14 06:22 help regarding suif

Vladimir Ivanov

2005-02-28 12:52 [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x

Vladimir Makarov

2005-02-24 15:27 Re: Benchmark of gcc 4.0

Vladimir Merzliakov

2005-02-27 18:42 XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc

Volker Reichelt

2005-02-22 09:56 C++ function pointer weirdness
2005-02-24 10:46 Suggestion: Different exit code for ICE

Walter Landry

2005-02-08 01:41 Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-08 04:17 Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
2005-02-15 02:03 Using up double diskspace for working copies (Was Re: Detailsforsvn test repository)

Wei . Feng

2005-02-17 09:10 GCC problem with using "-fprofile-arcs"

Will Reece

2005-02-06 12:09 Stack Checking implementation problems

Zack Weinberg

2005-02-06 09:41 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
2005-02-06 19:46 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-06 23:09 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-07 16:55 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-07 17:03 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-07 18:14 Re: C++ Darwin Port BUG in source code
2005-02-09 01:29 Re: Test result email failure
2005-02-09 01:36 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets
2005-02-09 03:10 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets
2005-02-09 07:33 Re: make -j lots building and testing gcc
2005-02-09 18:27 Re: Ping: build testing broken for many multilib targets
2005-02-10 23:54 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions
2005-02-11 00:13 Re: C++ testcase question: pointers to member functions
2005-02-12 01:32 Re: Details for svn test repository
2005-02-28 02:57 RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
2005-02-28 20:33 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
2005-02-28 20:44 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
2005-02-28 20:46 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
2005-02-28 20:47 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
2005-02-28 20:48 Re: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros

Zdenek Dvorak

2005-02-07 22:32 Re: Empty loop removal
2005-02-07 22:35 Re: Empty loop removal
2005-02-09 13:06 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-09 13:22 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-09 13:22 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-09 13:27 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-09 13:46 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-09 14:53 Re: fold: &a[i1] + c * i2 -> &a[i1 + i2] messing up types
2005-02-10 11:12 Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/19078] [4.0 Regression] Poor quality code after loop unrolling.
2005-02-10 11:26 fold_build
2005-02-10 16:00 Re: fold_build
2005-02-19 10:26 Re: [PATCH] Don't assume const/pure calls are total (fix PR tree-optimization/19828)
2005-02-25 17:17 CVS problem
2005-02-27 23:38 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-28 00:05 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-28 00:06 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
2005-02-28 00:31 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3

gcc archiveauthor index for February, 2005

gcc archive
author index for February, 2005