This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
To: Lars Segerlund <lars dot segerlund at comsys dot se>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:25:18 +0000
Subject: Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
References: <200303131400.h2DE0ZB24570@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <3E709381.5090500@comsys.se>

Lars Segerlund wrote:-

>  Are there any arguments against this other than ideological ? ( this 
> flag doesn't interfere with gcc's normal operation and only when it's 
> needed is it in effect, how can that be so bad ? ).

That's not a good argument for yet-another-switch-in-gcc.

Neil.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
  - From: Lars Segerlund

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]