gcc archive
author index for March, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

=?big5?b?UHVmZiBDaHVhbmcgLSCy+LDqutU=?=

• 2003-03-25 02:40 Any GCC Porting for microSPARC(v8) on VxWorks?
• 2003-03-25 06:13 Re: Any GCC Porting for microSPARC(v8) on VxWorks?

Rubén Yáñez R.

• 2003-03-15 07:16 Problem in cvs repository

João Boto Correia

• 2003-03-21 19:23 Successful build of gcc 3.2.1 in alphaev67-dec-osf5.1

Pop Sébastian

• 2003-03-04 11:02 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 15:33 Re: Optimizing GCC
• 2003-03-07 12:51 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-14 13:30 Re: GCC tree access & Pretty-print
• 2003-03-14 13:46 Re: another tree access question

thomas joseph

• 2003-03-20 12:29 volatile with O2

Tamás Gergely

• 2003-03-14 16:08 __thread
• 2003-03-17 11:24 glibc problems with snapshot

Abe Stevens

• 2003-03-06 17:14 Please reply !!
• 2003-03-06 23:00 Help needed!!

Abhijit Gupta

• 2003-03-12 14:51 wstring in gcc

abot

• 2003-03-21 22:36 Hey!
• 2003-03-21 22:38 Hey!

adland

• 2003-03-20 15:09 Re: Words endian is different in registers than in memory
• 2003-03-20 16:19 Re: Words endian is different in registers than in memory

Alan Modra

• 2003-03-20 05:28 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure
• 2003-03-20 06:23 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure
• 2003-03-21 00:25 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure
• 2003-03-25 12:12 REQ_EQUAL and mems hoisted out of loops
• 2003-03-26 08:49 Re: REQ_EQUAL and mems hoisted out of loops

Albert Chin

• 2003-03-18 15:50 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 22:57 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-20 05:24 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)

Aldy Hernandez

• 2003-03-01 05:20 rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation
• 2003-03-03 17:10 mixing LGPL and GPL in gcc
• 2003-03-03 17:10 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation
• 2003-03-03 19:07 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant
• 2003-03-06 17:44 java status
• 2003-03-10 01:22 dejagnu/kernel bugs on darwin?
• 2003-03-10 03:04 rfc: unwinder, ppc-spe dual sized registers, and a patch...
• 2003-03-10 04:36 Re: rfc: unwinder, ppc-spe dual sized registers, and a patch...
• 2003-03-10 15:24 Re: dejagnu/kernel bugs on darwin?
• 2003-03-10 19:04 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation
• 2003-03-10 19:05 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation
• 2003-03-11 20:23 TARGET_STRING problem on ppc
• 2003-03-11 21:22 Re: TARGET_STRING problem on ppc
• 2003-03-27 21:17 RFC: new rtl vec_set_unit/vec_get_unit
• 2003-03-31 19:24 Re: RFC: new rtl vec_set_unit/vec_get_unit

Alex Monaghan

• 2003-03-04 14:33 FW: GCC on PIC

Alexandre Oliva

• 2003-03-03 08:58 Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh?
• 2003-03-03 10:08 Re: compile server design document
• 2003-03-03 10:09 Re: Should contrib/test_summary work with joined gcc/binutils/gdb?
• 2003-03-03 10:18 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-03-03 10:24 Re: Object files know where they're built?!?
• 2003-03-03 10:25 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree
• 2003-03-03 19:41 Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh?
• 2003-03-04 01:42 Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh?
• 2003-03-04 19:25 Re: automated sizeof usage?
• 2003-03-04 21:46 Re: enable-languages=c doesn't turn off libstdc++ any more?
• 2003-03-05 22:43 Re: configure --with-sysroot
• 2003-03-06 06:49 Re: configure --with-sysroot
• 2003-03-06 09:23 Re: configure --with-sysroot
• 2003-03-06 17:17 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 17:24 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-12 20:09 Re: why doesn't "--program-prefix=<foo>" work?
• 2003-03-12 20:18 Re: configure --with-sysroot
• 2003-03-16 18:31 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-16 18:37 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-16 18:41 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-16 18:56 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure
• 2003-03-16 19:02 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported configuration styles?
• 2003-03-16 19:18 Re: locked again
• 2003-03-16 19:31 Re: alloca + inline
• 2003-03-16 19:33 Re: Can the function "connect()" & "listen() + accept()" be used with the same TCP port at the same time ?
• 2003-03-31 19:33 Re: review process
• 2003-03-31 20:03 Re: review process

Alexy Khrabrov

• 2003-03-16 23:52 -Wnotanidiot's future?
• 2003-03-20 17:04 Re: -Wnotanidiot's future?
• 2003-03-20 19:47 Re: Additional GCC warnings?

Allan Sandfeld

• 2003-03-04 10:33 Re: Intel 386 and AMD x86-64 Options
• 2003-03-06 11:47 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-15 10:40 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)

Aloy

• 2003-03-28 08:47 Exceptions in 2.7.2

Amit Kohli

• 2003-03-12 09:35 RE: Target Deprecation

Ander

• 2003-03-03 20:57 Intel 386 and AMD x86-64 Options
• 2003-03-03 23:55 Re: Intel 386 and AMD x86-64 Options
• 2003-03-04 12:42 Re: Intel 386 and AMD x86-64 Options
• 2003-03-13 13:01 There is errors in the translation of gcc

Anders Ådland

• 2003-03-25 13:44 INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS(): bug?
• 2003-03-26 09:19 Re: INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS()

Andi Kleen

• 2003-03-01 18:35 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-03-01 19:42 Re: Assembly code parametriaztion
• 2003-03-13 21:49 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 15:03 Re: Speed discussion ...

Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci

• 2003-03-14 09:40 Re: Problem with Usage of GNU GCC compiler with VC++
• 2003-03-14 17:44 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-25 11:20 Re: ld.so mechanism

Andreas Jaeger

• 2003-03-06 04:26 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline)
• 2003-03-07 10:17 Re: Compile time speed
• 2003-03-10 11:49 Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x
• 2003-03-10 12:25 Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x
• 2003-03-11 07:09 Re: gcc gcc-3_3-branch has configure.in newer than configure
• 2003-03-14 05:27 Re: GCC 3.3: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu added to secondary evaluationplatforms
• 2003-03-14 13:25 bootstrap failure in libstdc++-v3
• 2003-03-14 19:15 Re: bootstrap failure in libstdc++-v3
• 2003-03-15 09:44 Re: Patch submission process
• 2003-03-17 08:13 Re: XFAILing V3 tests.
• 2003-03-22 06:57 Re: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited
• 2003-03-22 14:26 Re: build success
• 2003-03-29 05:19 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3with g++ 3.3
• 2003-03-29 15:11 Re: Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure
• 2003-03-30 10:20 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-30 14:47 Re: Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure
• 2003-03-30 14:55 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite

Andreas Schwab

• 2003-03-04 11:12 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 10:24 Mainline bootstrap failure (warning regression)
• 2003-03-07 17:05 Mainline infinite recursion on ia64
• 2003-03-12 17:34 Re: What optimizations does -O1 enable?
• 2003-03-13 10:06 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem
• 2003-03-13 11:07 Re: Array subscript has type 'char' and constant expressions
• 2003-03-13 11:21 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem
• 2003-03-14 09:57 Re: -fobey-inline
• 2003-03-14 16:50 Re: __thread
• 2003-03-14 20:00 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 19:51 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 10:47 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 13:18 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 20:40 Re: Is there a way to do the following with gcc?
• 2003-03-19 10:08 Re: first shot at a draft 3.2.3 release note
• 2003-03-24 11:08 Re: GCC 3.3 release
• 2003-03-26 13:33 Re: problem with g++
• 2003-03-29 15:44 Bootstrap failure on ia64

Andreas Tobler

• 2003-03-03 15:12 Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh?
• 2003-03-03 20:24 Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh?
• 2003-03-04 05:54 Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh?
• 2003-03-18 21:13 Re: __attribute__ ((aligned)) weirdness
• 2003-03-28 21:23 sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9?

Andrew Haley

• 2003-03-04 17:17 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 11:39 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 16:36 Help on installing gcc 3.2
• 2003-03-11 18:04 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment
• 2003-03-11 18:25 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment
• 2003-03-13 13:54 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-13 19:30 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 15:26 g++: __attribute__ ((aligned)) weirdness
• 2003-03-18 20:01 Re: __attribute__ ((aligned)) weirdness
• 2003-03-19 10:20 Darwin gcc 3.3 sizeof of C++ structures with long long ints is strange
• 2003-03-20 15:24 Re: Words endian is different in registers than in memory
• 2003-03-20 16:33 Re: Words endian is different in registers than in memory
• 2003-03-20 16:36 Re: Words endian is different in registers than in memory
• 2003-03-21 10:38 On alignment
• 2003-03-21 13:41 On alignment
• 2003-03-21 15:26 Re: On alignment
• 2003-03-22 09:12 Re: On alignment
• 2003-03-25 09:26 Re: On alignment
• 2003-03-25 09:35 Massive libjava failures in mainline x86
• 2003-03-26 10:36 Re: On alignment
• 2003-03-26 19:32 bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut.
• 2003-03-26 19:54 Re: bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut.
• 2003-03-27 19:37 Don't generate a new SYMBOL_REF in write_resource_constructor
• 2003-03-30 23:14 Re: Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure

Andrew Pinski

• 2003-03-07 00:49 Re: Build failure in libstdc++
• 2003-03-25 04:18 java testsuite on Linux i386: 2.4.18

Andrew Walrond

• 2003-03-05 14:14 Fun with gcc 3_3-branch
• 2003-03-07 00:26 cvs archive problems
• 2003-03-07 00:41 Re: cvs archive problems
• 2003-03-07 16:35 Re: problem with subversions.gnu.org?
• 2003-03-08 11:21 Re: Why is subversions.gnu.org locked for long time?

Andy Curtis

• 2003-03-17 20:29 Is there a way to do the following with gcc?
• 2003-03-17 20:49 RE: Is there a way to do the following with gcc?

Angelo Corsaro

• 2003-03-14 15:51 Amazingly Slow GCC anon CVS access

Anjali Sharma

• 2003-03-04 07:54 Re: Using Math Functions
• 2003-03-06 10:35 problem for powerpc gcc
• 2003-03-26 09:55 problem with g++

Anna Fowles-Winkler

• 2003-03-03 17:13 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 00:58 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 17:44 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 20:49 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-10 15:01 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-10 15:09 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?

Anthony Green

• 2003-03-29 03:04 64-bit Solaris and shared libraries
• 2003-03-29 16:20 Re: 64-bit Solaris and shared libraries

Arnaud Charlet

• 2003-03-27 22:10 ACATS & GCC testsuite (Was Re: Ada: Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7)
• 2003-03-29 08:48 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-30 09:51 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-30 12:17 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-30 12:20 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite

Art Haas

• 2003-03-25 21:24 A nice improvement in GCC-3.3

Ashif S. Harji

• 2003-03-01 22:06 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag (patches for gcc3.3)
• 2003-03-01 23:56 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag (patches for gcc3.3)

Ayal Zaks

• 2003-03-28 00:19 Re: First scheduling pass

B. Kosnik

• 2003-03-11 00:40 Re: pch messages [was: Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2compilation speed?]

Bauer, Rich

• 2003-03-11 16:51 Mailing List Help

Ben Collins

• 2003-03-01 16:05 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-03-01 16:27 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-03-04 15:12 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2003-03-04 17:24 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 17:25 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 17:41 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 19:20 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 19:12 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 19:18 Re: New 3.3 libstdc++ testsuite failures on s390x (64-bit only)
• 2003-03-07 22:08 Re: New 3.3 libstdc++ testsuite failures on s390x (64-bit only)
• 2003-03-08 00:44 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-08 08:24 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-08 21:13 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-09 21:11 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-11 05:26 more pch questions
• 2003-03-11 19:04 Re: more pch questions
• 2003-03-12 04:52 Re: more pch questions
• 2003-03-13 00:24 Re: libstdc++/1773: __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L
• 2003-03-17 17:34 Re: XFAILing V3 tests.
• 2003-03-17 20:22 Re: XFAILing V3 tests.

Bernd Schmidt

• 2003-03-01 13:16 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-03-15 15:48 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 16:08 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 17:05 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 17:14 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 20:52 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 21:25 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-16 15:19 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-16 15:45 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)

Biagio Lucini

• 2003-03-07 11:09 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?

Binil K Babu

• 2003-03-04 11:20 Please clear my doubt

blhewitt

• 2003-03-17 18:32 timing of lexical analysis in -ftime-report

Bodunde Thompson,

• 2003-03-14 23:11 urgent from thompson

Bonzini

• 2003-03-12 17:57 Re: What optimizations does -O1 enable?

Brad Lucier

• 2003-03-07 16:14 problem with subversions.gnu.org?

Brandon L Hewitt

• 2003-03-18 07:57 RE: timing of lexical analysis in -ftime-report

Brett Smith

• 2003-03-04 21:01 [julias@macrovision.com: arg.]
• 2003-03-12 07:22 [Edward_Ho@necelam.com: FSF 3.3 GCC release] [gnu.org #23233]

Bruce Korb

• 2003-03-02 21:26 RE: Object files know where they're built?!?
• 2003-03-31 19:41 Re: Patch approval process suggestion

c . christian . joensson

• 2003-03-26 19:14 Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty?

calvesmit

• 2003-03-04 05:28 Using Math Functions

Carlos Sánchez de La Lama

• 2003-03-06 12:50 Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers
• 2003-03-06 14:39 Re: Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers

Casey Leedom

• 2003-03-27 21:35 SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3
• 2003-03-27 23:04 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3
• 2003-03-27 23:29 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3
• 2003-03-28 00:04 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3
• 2003-03-28 21:43 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3

cgd

• 2003-03-15 01:38 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends

Charles Wilson

• 2003-03-07 21:52 gcc-3.2.2, IRIX6.5, pthreads

Chris Lattner

• 2003-03-05 22:18 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end

Chris Plummer

• 2003-03-20 00:14 --program-prefix not working

Christian Ehrhardt

• 2003-03-10 19:57 preprocess_constraints, reg-stack.c and register classes
• 2003-03-10 20:58 Re: preprocess_constraints, reg-stack.c and register classes

Christian Jendeberg

• 2003-03-31 20:02 GCC installation on several machines

Christian Joensson

• 2003-03-26 12:46 gcc 3.3 and libiberty?
• 2003-03-26 12:58 Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty?
• 2003-03-26 18:52 Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty?
• 2003-03-26 19:06 Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty?

Christian Parpart

• 2003-03-17 10:39 RFC: mp = &o.f;
• 2003-03-17 15:55 Re: RFC: mp = &o.f;
• 2003-03-18 04:18 Re: RFC: mp = &o.f;
• 2003-03-19 03:00 Re: RFC: mp = &o.f;
• 2003-03-27 20:39 Re: Problem with TLS initialization

Christopher Faylor

• 2003-03-04 05:35 Re: Target deprecation, round four
• 2003-03-17 03:02 Re: locked again
• 2003-03-22 17:50 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-27 14:45 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-28 04:21 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover

CorporateFriends.com

• 2003-03-06 23:29 Your Corporate Alumni Club Network
• 2003-03-06 23:31 Your Corporate Alumni Club Network
• 2003-03-06 23:52 Your Corporate Alumni Club Network
• 2003-03-06 23:53 Your Corporate Alumni Club Network

Craig Rodrigues

• 2003-03-08 15:02 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions
• 2003-03-08 19:23 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions
• 2003-03-11 23:51 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions

Crispin Cowan

• 2003-03-25 01:01 Re: [tm_gccmail@mail.kloo.net: Re: gcc for any microcontroller?]

Curtis C. Chen

• 2003-03-06 17:27 successfully built and installed GCC

Dag Bakke

• 2003-03-04 14:22 Re: Optimizing GCC

Dagan, Amit

• 2003-03-11 13:10 Exposing a relocatable functions when using a version script

Dale Johannesen

• 2003-03-04 17:55 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 17:54 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 18:01 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline)
• 2003-03-06 19:16 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline)
• 2003-03-06 20:43 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387)
• 2003-03-06 22:30 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387)
• 2003-03-13 01:46 store double-cvtd-to-int to memory
• 2003-03-14 02:58 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 03:05 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 18:52 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory
• 2003-03-14 19:53 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory
• 2003-03-21 01:41 new unroller vs ppc
• 2003-03-23 19:40 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory
• 2003-03-27 17:55 Re: First scheduling pass

Dan Towner

• 2003-03-03 15:03 New Port Contribution
• 2003-03-05 13:03 Register allocation failure
• 2003-03-13 10:48 Turning off gcov build for embedded processor
• 2003-03-13 12:12 Re: Turning off gcov build for embedded processor
• 2003-03-25 16:53 DFA scheduling bug?
• 2003-03-26 20:25 Re: New Port Contribution
• 2003-03-26 22:51 Re: New Port Contribution

Daniel Berlin

• 2003-03-03 19:49 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-03 20:35 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-03 20:42 bugzilla data about to be updated
• 2003-03-04 03:06 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-04 15:34 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-04 18:26 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 21:05 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-06 01:14 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-06 15:38 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-06 17:25 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-06 17:31 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-11 23:29 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions
• 2003-03-12 00:13 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions
• 2003-03-12 00:44 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions
• 2003-03-14 06:26 Testing bugzilla patch viewer for gcc patches
• 2003-03-20 19:16 Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-20 19:49 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-20 20:16 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-20 20:27 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-21 03:06 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-21 15:28 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-21 17:01 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-21 22:13 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-21 22:39 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-22 17:03 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-24 18:04 Re: wwwdocs/bugzilla/docs/images caution.gif note.gif tip.gif warning.gif
• 2003-03-24 18:23 Re: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited
• 2003-03-25 16:36 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-25 17:28 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-25 20:45 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-25 21:01 Re: Parsing mail to Bugzilla
• 2003-03-25 21:55 Re: Parsing mail to Bugzilla
• 2003-03-25 22:25 Re: Parsing mail to Bugzilla
• 2003-03-26 22:54 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-27 00:59 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-31 16:06 Re: review process
• 2003-03-31 17:40 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-31 17:58 Re: review process
• 2003-03-31 18:42 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-31 19:52 Re: review process
• 2003-03-31 22:32 Delay in bugzilla switchover

Daniel Carrera

• 2003-03-01 06:20 2.95 vs 3.2 on a SPARC

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2003-03-01 04:58 Re: Internal compiler error in gcc3.0.2 for ppc403
• 2003-03-01 05:12 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree
• 2003-03-01 16:11 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree
• 2003-03-01 16:12 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-03-04 19:46 enable-languages=c doesn't turn off libstdc++ any more?
• 2003-03-05 16:58 Re: why doesn't "--program-prefix=<foo>" work?
• 2003-03-05 17:04 Re: configure --with-sysroot
• 2003-03-05 17:32 Re: why doesn't "--program-prefix=<foo>" work?
• 2003-03-05 18:52 Re: configure --with-sysroot
• 2003-03-07 14:33 Re: gcc-3.2.2 for armv5b - big endian not the default?
• 2003-03-09 20:49 Re: Anonymous structure return problem
• 2003-03-10 04:20 [rtlopt] Location list data
• 2003-03-10 04:27 Re: [rtlopt] Location list data
• 2003-03-10 05:28 Re: [rtlopt] Location list data
• 2003-03-10 16:39 Re: [rtlopt] Location list data
• 2003-03-11 00:53 Re: gprof inaccuracy
• 2003-03-12 20:08 Re: more pch questions
• 2003-03-12 20:09 Re: why doesn't "--program-prefix=<foo>" work?
• 2003-03-13 14:47 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 04:05 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure
• 2003-03-15 18:36 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 00:55 Re: HOWTO: Test in-src build without requiring much extra disk space
• 2003-03-20 02:31 Re: --program-prefix not working
• 2003-03-21 03:58 Re: how to implement pipeline errata?
• 2003-03-21 15:39 Re: GCC 3.2.1 Bug on XScale?
• 2003-03-25 22:04 Re: Parsing mail to Bugzilla
• 2003-03-28 14:47 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-28 14:50 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-28 14:57 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-28 22:07 Re: Namespace for <cfoo> headers incorrect?

David Edelsohn

• 2003-03-02 21:41 IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C failure due to cpplib patch
• 2003-03-06 14:59 Re: problem for powerpc gcc
• 2003-03-06 19:08 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline)
• 2003-03-07 15:52 AIX bootstrap failure
• 2003-03-07 17:20 Re: Mainline infinite recursion on ia64
• 2003-03-10 19:07 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation
• 2003-03-10 20:53 Re: target_flags
• 2003-03-11 20:49 Re: TARGET_STRING problem on ppc
• 2003-03-11 21:44 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-14 18:55 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory
• 2003-03-19 23:47 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure
• 2003-03-19 23:52 Re: Darwin gcc 3.3 sizeof of C++ structures with long long ints is strange
• 2003-03-20 05:44 Re: Darwin gcc 3.3 sizeof of C++ structures with long long ints is strange
• 2003-03-22 06:26 Re: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited
• 2003-03-24 15:35 Re: PR optimization/9745
• 2003-03-25 16:48 Re: gcc issue on AIX
• 2003-03-25 18:13 Re: REQ_EQUAL and mems hoisted out of loops
• 2003-03-25 19:57 Re: Gcc Mail-list server misconfigured?
• 2003-03-26 19:52 Re: new unroller vs ppc
• 2003-03-27 15:42 Re: First scheduling pass
• 2003-03-29 01:17 Re: new unroller vs ppc

David Taylor

• 2003-03-20 19:32 Additional GCC warnings?
• 2003-03-20 20:25 Re: Additional GCC warnings?

David Wilder

• 2003-03-06 20:52 -gstabs in ia64

Denis Chertykov

• 2003-03-03 21:10 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-04 20:20 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-05 22:01 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-06 16:37 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-07 17:44 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-21 15:41 Re: AVR target broken in mainline - abort in expand_mult

Devang Patel

• 2003-03-01 04:36 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-03-01 04:52 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-03-07 23:29 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?

Diego Novillo

• 2003-03-03 00:54 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-03-02
• 2003-03-03 13:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-03-02
• 2003-03-03 15:43 [tree-ssa] coding style for structure fields
• 2003-03-04 23:13 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-10 12:40 New #define EDGE_ALL_FLAGS in mainline
• 2003-03-21 02:18 Re: Automatic vectorization?
• 2003-03-24 14:16 Massive libjava failures in mainline x86
• 2003-03-25 15:32 [tree-ssa] Grammar for GIMPLE condexprs
• 2003-03-25 18:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Grammar for GIMPLE condexprs
• 2003-03-25 19:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Grammar for GIMPLE condexprs

Dimitry Golubovsky

• 2003-03-09 20:12 Anonymous structure return problem

Disney

• 2003-03-30 05:17 Visite a Disney

DJ Delorie

• 2003-03-03 20:31 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrommake check*
• 2003-03-06 23:15 RFC: target-specific overrides to block reordering heuristics
• 2003-03-09 18:51 Re: Stormy16 doesn't build
• 2003-03-10 20:29 Re: target_flags
• 2003-03-11 02:44 Re: target_flags
• 2003-03-13 00:52 can't build v850: aborts in schedule_block
• 2003-03-13 04:03 Re: can't build v850: aborts in schedule_block
• 2003-03-14 17:17 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure
• 2003-03-14 17:36 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure
• 2003-03-14 18:08 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported make implementations?
• 2003-03-14 20:58 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported configurationstyles?
• 2003-03-14 21:27 Re: Time to update documentaion regarding supported configuration style
• 2003-03-14 21:28 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?)
• 2003-03-14 21:37 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?)
• 2003-03-14 21:50 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?)
• 2003-03-14 22:01 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?)
• 2003-03-14 23:10 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?)
• 2003-03-26 17:21 Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty?
• 2003-03-26 19:00 Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty?
• 2003-03-26 19:11 Re: gcc 3.3 and libiberty?

Drew Lebauer

• 2003-03-19 12:21 do I need cygwin for gcc on pc?

Duraivelan

• 2003-03-18 09:05 need some help in posix thread compilation option..

E. Weddington

• 2003-03-05 16:20 GCC Extensions web page
• 2003-03-13 00:10 Re: FW: GCC cross compiler question

Edward Ho

• 2003-03-12 17:31 RE: [gnu.org #23233] FSF 3.3 GCC release

Eric Botcazou

• 2003-03-06 09:53 Re: C optimizer bug
• 2003-03-10 16:30 C++ front-end question
• 2003-03-12 09:46 Re: C++ front-end question
• 2003-03-12 11:33 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-17 23:53 Reload question
• 2003-03-19 13:06 Re: Reload question
• 2003-03-20 07:51 Re: problem when build gcc
• 2003-03-21 07:47 Re: build gcc
• 2003-03-21 11:49 ifcvt question
• 2003-03-21 16:20 About PR optimization/9279
• 2003-03-22 10:31 Re: ifcvt question
• 2003-03-22 15:13 Re: build success
• 2003-03-26 15:06 Dwarf2 question
• 2003-03-27 07:42 Re: Dwarf2 question
• 2003-03-28 16:29 Re: __STDC__ == 0 in System Headers on Solaris?

Eric Christopher

• 2003-03-01 07:36 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree
• 2003-03-04 05:05 Re: Configuring GCC
• 2003-03-11 17:07 Re: gcc-3.2.2, IRIX6.5, pthreads
• 2003-03-14 00:45 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 01:25 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 00:53 Re: Mips C++ undefined reference tostd::_Alloc_traits<...>::_S_instanceless
• 2003-03-22 00:11 Re: how to implement pipeline errata?
• 2003-03-24 18:34 Re: Vr4131
• 2003-03-25 06:48 Re: Any GCC Porting for microSPARC(v8) on VxWorks?
• 2003-03-26 19:04 Re: bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut.

Eric Lemings

• 2003-03-28 20:42 Namespace for <cfoo> headers incorrect?

Eric R. Krause

• 2003-03-03 03:00 gcc-ss-20030224: configure gives warnings on i686-pc-cygwin

Eyal Lebedinsky

• 2003-03-30 02:03 tree-ssa -fmudflap problems
• 2003-03-31 22:15 Re: tree-ssa -fmudflap problems

Fabio Alemagna

• 2003-03-05 02:13 [RFC] Parametrized macro names
• 2003-03-05 02:55 Re: [RFC] Parametrized macro names
• 2003-03-05 04:27 Re: [RFC] Parametrized macro names
• 2003-03-05 04:35 Re: [RFC] Parametrized macro names
• 2003-03-05 21:20 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end

Falk Hueffner

• 2003-03-10 21:21 Re: Intel 386 and AMD x86-64 Options
• 2003-03-10 23:03 Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x
• 2003-03-12 16:57 Re: What optimizations does -O1 enable?
• 2003-03-25 21:43 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-25 22:17 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-26 15:29 Re: Dwarf2 question
• 2003-03-27 08:02 Re: Dwarf2 question
• 2003-03-27 10:26 Re: First scheduling pass
• 2003-03-30 12:45 long long bit-fields
• 2003-03-31 06:35 Re: long long bit-fields

Fergus Henderson

• 2003-03-03 02:40 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrom make check*
• 2003-03-06 14:44 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 16:30 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-07 03:51 Re: Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers
• 2003-03-10 15:20 Re: Problems getting gcc from CVS
• 2003-03-14 16:25 Re: __thread
• 2003-03-14 18:41 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-16 08:36 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc
• 2003-03-18 23:07 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-19 12:27 Re: do I need cygwin for gcc on pc?
• 2003-03-21 03:26 Re: __thread

Frank Ch. Eigler

• 2003-03-31 14:40 Re: tree-ssa -fmudflap problems

Fred Fish

• 2003-03-19 01:59 Questions about match_scratch in machine description files

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2003-03-03 06:56 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-03-04 05:43 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 06:40 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 08:35 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 09:20 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 10:06 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 12:11 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 12:16 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 14:55 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 15:03 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 15:08 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 15:19 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 15:38 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 20:57 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 21:52 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 07:19 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 16:01 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 07:07 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 07:58 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 22:25 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 12:18 Re: Compile time speed
• 2003-03-10 01:21 Plan for GCC-3.2.3
• 2003-03-10 05:07 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-10 05:21 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-10 05:34 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-10 06:10 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-11 20:48 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-11 20:50 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-11 21:33 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-11 21:35 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-11 22:06 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-14 11:53 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 12:10 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-14 12:11 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-14 12:14 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-15 15:54 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-16 09:35 Re: alloca + inline
• 2003-03-16 19:04 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 20:11 Re: XFAILing V3 tests.
• 2003-03-17 20:14 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 20:17 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 20:43 Re: XFAILing V3 tests.
• 2003-03-17 21:58 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup
• 2003-03-18 00:01 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX
• 2003-03-18 03:06 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 03:28 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 06:30 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-19 22:46 gengtype and typedef to enum
• 2003-03-19 23:19 Re: gengtype and typedef to enum
• 2003-03-20 00:57 Re: gengtype and typedef to enum
• 2003-03-24 18:14 C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-24 18:44 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-24 19:18 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-24 20:08 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-24 21:51 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-24 22:40 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ Question
• 2003-03-25 02:27 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-25 03:13 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup
• 2003-03-25 05:42 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-25 10:58 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-25 10:59 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-26 06:56 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-26 06:59 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-26 20:01 Re: PATCH for Re: GCC 3.3 release
• 2003-03-29 13:45 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-30 08:20 Re: Converting to ISO C89

Gabriel Paubert

• 2003-03-24 16:01 Re: gcc for any microcontroller?

gabriele

• 2003-03-31 08:38 Passes for a new porting

Gabriele Caracausi

• 2003-03-28 10:53 Microchip Porting... HELP!
• 2003-03-30 22:02 what is the meaning of '*'?

Gareth Pearce

• 2003-03-04 20:02 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 20:42 Re: Optimizing GCC
• 2003-03-04 22:55 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 02:09 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-12 06:02 Re: more pch questions

gcc

• 2003-03-01 03:53 Hello gcc !
• 2003-03-01 03:54 Hello gcc !

gccadmin

• 2003-03-03 17:04 gcc-ss-20030303 is now available
• 2003-03-10 17:20 gcc-ss-20030310 is now available
• 2003-03-17 17:10 gcc-ss-20030317 is now available
• 2003-03-24 17:13 gcc-ss-20030324 is now available
• 2003-03-31 17:13 gcc-ss-20030331 is now available

Geert Bosch

• 2003-03-04 18:18 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 18:21 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 19:56 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
• 2003-03-04 22:03 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
• 2003-03-07 23:05 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-11 21:48 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-17 20:36 What autogen is needed for GCC?
• 2003-03-20 19:58 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-20 20:23 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-20 22:19 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
• 2003-03-21 20:40 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-22 00:22 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-28 00:03 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-28 15:00 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite

Geoff Keating

• 2003-03-03 19:42 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant
• 2003-03-03 20:51 #include_next and absolute pathnames
• 2003-03-03 23:51 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames
• 2003-03-04 00:00 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames
• 2003-03-04 01:03 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames
• 2003-03-04 20:49 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 22:02 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 21:46 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387)
• 2003-03-06 19:26 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387)
• 2003-03-07 20:57 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 21:57 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 22:50 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 22:57 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-08 01:38 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-08 20:27 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-08 20:30 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions
• 2003-03-08 22:09 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-10 04:43 Re: dejagnu/kernel bugs on darwin?
• 2003-03-10 05:04 Re: [rtlopt] Location list data
• 2003-03-10 20:47 Re: vtable in read-only sections
• 2003-03-11 01:13 Re: pch messages [was: Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?]
• 2003-03-11 20:47 Re: TARGET_STRING problem on ppc
• 2003-03-12 19:20 Re: more pch questions
• 2003-03-14 00:37 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-14 19:37 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory
• 2003-03-14 23:50 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 23:54 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-15 01:45 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-15 23:04 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-15 23:18 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 23:37 Re: alloca + inline
• 2003-03-17 21:52 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup
• 2003-03-18 07:41 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup
• 2003-03-19 20:12 Re: __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generates broken code
• 2003-03-20 00:00 Re: gengtype and typedef to enum
• 2003-03-20 09:05 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure
• 2003-03-30 07:36 Re: Problems with gcc on Darwin/Mac OS X
• 2003-03-31 21:39 Re: review process

Geoffrey Keating

• 2003-03-04 21:49 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-03-04 22:23 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-03-04 22:43 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-03-11 18:55 Re: more pch questions
• 2003-03-11 19:25 Re: more pch questions

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2003-03-16 09:49 Re: [julias@macrovision.com: arg.]
• 2003-03-18 08:48 Re: Bugzilla user/group permissions
• 2003-03-20 00:12 Re: GCC anonymous CVS
• 2003-03-20 11:25 Re: Plan for GCC-3.2.3
• 2003-03-21 09:16 Re: GCC anonymous CVS
• 2003-03-21 09:34 Re: GCC Infrastructure File
• 2003-03-21 09:50 Re: GCC Infrastructure File
• 2003-03-21 16:27 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-24 09:15 Re: gcc request
• 2003-03-24 10:50 Re: wwwdocs/bugzilla/docs/images caution.gif note.gif tip.gifwarning.gif
• 2003-03-24 11:04 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-24 18:31 Re: wwwdocs/bugzilla/docs/images caution.gif note.gif tip.gifwarning.gif
• 2003-03-25 09:29 Re: Command Options/Compiler Passes page not updated.
• 2003-03-25 11:26 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-25 14:16 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up
• 2003-03-25 15:16 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions
• 2003-03-26 19:19 PATCH for Re: GCC 3.3 release
• 2003-03-26 19:23 Re: New Port Contribution
• 2003-03-26 21:14 Re: Target-specific bugs
• 2003-03-26 21:20 Re: Target-specific bugs
• 2003-03-26 21:23 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-27 00:32 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-27 07:54 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-27 10:33 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-28 14:59 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-29 12:25 Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure
• 2003-03-30 22:09 Re: Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure
• 2003-03-31 07:47 Re: review process
• 2003-03-31 08:46 Building OpenOffice with GCJ?
• 2003-03-31 13:36 RE: [gnu.org #23233] FSF 3.3 GCC release

Gerard Beekmans

• 2003-03-03 21:07 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)
• 2003-03-04 16:29 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)
• 2003-03-04 20:08 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)
• 2003-03-04 20:32 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)
• 2003-03-04 21:01 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)

Gerhard Tonn

• 2003-03-06 06:49 gcc 3.2 -> gcc 3.3 ABI change
• 2003-03-07 06:52 Re: gcc 3.2 -> gcc 3.3 ABI change

Gerold J. Wucherpfennig

• 2003-03-01 21:21 Re: gcc and include dirs

Glen Nakamura

• 2003-03-15 09:28 Patch submission process
• 2003-03-15 10:40 Re: Patch submission process

gp

• 2003-03-05 16:51 configure --with-sysroot
• 2003-03-05 18:48 Re: configure --with-sysroot
• 2003-03-05 18:56 Re: configure --with-sysroot
• 2003-03-06 05:48 Re: configure --with-sysroot
• 2003-03-06 18:21 Re: configure --with-sysroot
• 2003-03-06 22:52 Re: configure --with-sysroot
• 2003-03-12 16:28 CVS woes
• 2003-03-14 17:32 Re: configure --with-sysroot
• 2003-03-14 21:09 Mips C++ undefined reference to std::_Alloc_traits<...>::_S_instanceless
• 2003-03-15 04:34 Re: Mips C++ undefined reference to std::_Alloc_traits<...>::_S_instanceless
• 2003-03-20 17:29 PATCH: SYSROOT_SUBDIR_SPEC (was configure --with-sysroot)
• 2003-03-24 16:09 Re: PATCH: SYSROOT_SUBDIR_SPEC (was configure --with-sysroot)

Greg Schafer

• 2003-03-17 07:08 Re: XFAILing V3 tests.

gs01han

• 2003-03-29 16:43 c++ question

Guillermo Ballester Valor

• 2003-03-25 19:53 Gcc Mail-list server misconfigured?
• 2003-03-25 21:15 Re: Gcc Mail-list server misconfigured?

Gunther Nikl

• 2003-03-13 09:20 decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem
• 2003-03-13 10:46 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem
• 2003-03-13 15:03 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem
• 2003-03-14 11:24 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem
• 2003-03-14 14:56 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem
• 2003-03-17 13:21 extended asm (Was: Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem)
• 2003-03-21 14:11 Re: extended asm (Was: Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem)
• 2003-03-21 15:02 native 3.x for m68k
• 2003-03-24 10:37 Re: GCC 3.3 release
• 2003-03-24 12:13 Re: GCC 3.3 release
• 2003-03-25 10:16 Re: GCC 3.3 release

H. J. Lu

• 2003-03-14 01:13 Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure
• 2003-03-14 06:13 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure
• 2003-03-14 16:39 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure
• 2003-03-14 17:29 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure
• 2003-03-14 17:36 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure
• 2003-03-14 17:41 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure
• 2003-03-21 16:11 Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.20 is released

Hans-Peter Nilsson

• 2003-03-05 03:33 Re: [PATCH] Warn on always-false BIT_AND_EXPRs (PR 9944)
• 2003-03-06 13:33 Re: Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers
• 2003-03-06 14:24 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline)
• 2003-03-06 14:50 Re: Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers
• 2003-03-06 15:10 OpenRISC port (was: Re: Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers)
• 2003-03-07 04:01 Re: Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers
• 2003-03-08 00:31 Re: tix fails to build for m68k-elf
• 2003-03-08 23:45 Re: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c
• 2003-03-09 17:04 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation
• 2003-03-09 17:09 Re: email-based regression search server
• 2003-03-11 04:12 Re: target_flags
• 2003-03-13 04:01 Re: can't build v850: aborts in schedule_block
• 2003-03-13 04:31 Re: can't build v850: aborts in schedule_block
• 2003-03-13 17:04 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem
• 2003-03-14 12:14 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem
• 2003-03-14 16:33 Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem
• 2003-03-17 16:39 Re: extended asm (Was: Re: decl_conflicts_with_clobbers_p problem)
• 2003-03-19 02:35 Re: define_delay working only when optimization on!
• 2003-03-24 03:25 Re: how much work is it to port a backend from 2.95.3 to head: wasRe: define_delay working only when optimization on!
• 2003-03-24 03:26 Re: Additional GCC warnings?
• 2003-03-25 17:16 Re: INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS(): bug?
• 2003-03-26 12:49 Re: INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS()

happy zh

• 2003-03-18 14:25 How to imply a.out format in gcc?

Hartmut Schirmer

• 2003-03-25 18:27 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation

Henrik

• 2003-03-15 18:49 New frontend: PL/I for gcc
• 2003-03-15 21:36 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc
• 2003-03-15 21:39 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc

Herbert Schmid

• 2003-03-04 16:56 Re: Optimizing GCC

Hermione Granger

• 2003-03-29 19:48 Cerr error

HRumde

• 2003-03-25 14:41 gcc issue on AIX

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng

• 2003-03-26 18:27 bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut.
• 2003-03-27 10:49 Re: bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut.

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2003-03-28 18:52 Re: Stab string field for array types

Irish & Julie Spring

• 2003-03-06 16:15 Help on installing gcc 3.2

Jacques THOMAS

• 2003-03-07 05:20 GCC scalability wrt _extra_ large generated C files
• 2003-03-13 20:48 Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-13 20:49 Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-13 23:05 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-18 19:35 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-18 19:39 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-18 20:23 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-19 00:29 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files

Jakub Jelinek

• 2003-03-20 11:20 Re: __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generates broken code
• 2003-03-20 13:05 [PATCH] Fix __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generates broken code
• 2003-03-29 08:27 Re: 64-bit Solaris and shared libraries
• 2003-03-31 09:22 Re: Building OpenOffice with GCJ?

James Dessart

• 2003-03-14 18:40 symbol resolution

James E. LaBarre

• 2003-03-25 16:06 Documentation problem

JAMES IDAHOSA

• 2003-03-14 23:46 urgent from thompson

James T Snell

• 2003-03-12 20:53 GCC suggestions

Jamie Lokier

• 2003-03-24 21:38 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS

Jan Hubicka

• 2003-03-05 17:33 Implementing unit-at-a-time for C++
• 2003-03-05 22:14 Re: Implementing unit-at-a-time for C++
• 2003-03-05 23:09 Re: Implementing unit-at-a-time for C++
• 2003-03-12 17:02 Re: What optimizations does -O1 enable?
• 2003-03-21 19:45 Re: GCC 3.3: inline-asm problems
• 2003-03-21 19:49 Re: Optimization patches
• 2003-03-21 20:31 Re: Optimization patches
• 2003-03-21 20:33 Re: Optimization patches
• 2003-03-21 20:52 Re: GCC 3.3: inline-asm problems
• 2003-03-25 12:13 Re: Command Options/Compiler Passes page not updated.
• 2003-03-25 19:06 CONSTANT_ADDRESS_P for i386/x86-64
• 2003-03-27 23:21 Re: RFC: new rtl vec_set_unit/vec_get_unit
• 2003-03-27 23:24 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3
• 2003-03-28 01:21 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3
• 2003-03-28 11:35 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3
• 2003-03-28 23:46 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3
• 2003-03-28 23:57 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3
• 2003-03-31 21:22 Re: 3.3 PRs
• 2003-03-31 21:44 Re: 3.3 PRs

Jan Van Dijk

• 2003-03-05 05:06 Question about PR/9447

Jan Vroonhof

• 2003-03-09 14:12 [tree-ssa] unSSA questions and missing reference.

Janis Johnson

• 2003-03-05 17:29 Re: GCC Extensions web page
• 2003-03-06 00:15 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline)
• 2003-03-08 00:37 Re: Using DLLs created with different compilers
• 2003-03-10 17:09 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-03-12 01:41 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-12 18:42 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-14 17:41 Re: Problem with Usage of GNU GCC compiler with VC++
• 2003-03-15 00:50 recent additions to GCC 3.2 build status list
• 2003-03-19 23:37 powerpc-linux bootstrap failure
• 2003-03-19 23:51 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure
• 2003-03-20 22:35 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
• 2003-03-21 16:34 Re: GCC Infrastructure File
• 2003-03-22 21:48 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-23 02:48 recent 3.3 compile times for PR 8361 test case
• 2003-03-24 23:34 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-31 21:02 Re: [PATCH] Duplicate entries in contrib.texi

Jason Merrill

• 2003-03-17 20:53 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue
• 2003-03-17 21:19 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue
• 2003-03-18 20:28 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue
• 2003-03-20 23:44 On alignment
• 2003-03-21 23:59 Re: On alignment
• 2003-03-25 02:15 Re: On alignment
• 2003-03-25 03:25 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ Question
• 2003-03-25 05:03 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-25 06:38 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-25 06:59 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ EH question
• 2003-03-25 15:05 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ EH question
• 2003-03-25 18:18 Re: [tree-ssa] Grammar for GIMPLE condexprs
• 2003-03-25 18:27 Re: On alignment
• 2003-03-25 18:32 Re: On alignment
• 2003-03-25 18:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Grammar for GIMPLE condexprs
• 2003-03-25 19:39 Re: On alignment
• 2003-03-26 00:05 rli->unpadded_align
• 2003-03-26 16:34 Re: rli->unpadded_align
• 2003-03-26 17:52 Re: rli->unpadded_align

Jason Molenda

• 2003-03-01 14:52 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-03-01 18:56 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2

Jason R Thorpe

• 2003-03-14 22:59 [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-15 00:22 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-15 01:44 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends

Jason Thorpe

• 2003-03-31 16:15 Re: what is the meaning of '*'?

jay

• 2003-03-03 00:53 gcc dies on inline assembly

Jeffery Cavallaro

• 2003-03-27 16:35 __STDC__ == 0 in System Headers on Solaris?

Jeffrey Naset

• 2003-03-13 21:49 Tail recursion problem (ptr_mode != Pmode)

Jeffrey Richardson

• 2003-03-13 18:32 GCC tree access & Pretty-print
• 2003-03-13 20:19 another tree access question

Jeson Martajaya

• 2003-03-25 07:12 ld.so mechanism

Jim Wilson

• 2003-03-01 03:54 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-03-07 23:09 Re: tix fails to build for m68k-elf
• 2003-03-07 23:55 Re: tix fails to build for m68k-elf
• 2003-03-09 20:17 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation
• 2003-03-09 20:23 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation

Jiri Pittner

• 2003-03-15 09:27 option for default 64-bit integers in g77 and gcc on ia64

Joe Buck

• 2003-03-12 17:59 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-14 22:59 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 17:29 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 17:32 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 17:48 Re: RFC: mp = &o.f;
• 2003-03-17 17:50 Re: Can the function "connect()" & "listen() + accept()" be used with the same TCP port at the same time ?
• 2003-03-17 19:22 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 20:37 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 17:04 Re: RFC: mp = &o.f;
• 2003-03-18 17:07 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX
• 2003-03-19 00:40 first shot at a draft 3.2.3 release note
• 2003-03-19 01:20 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX
• 2003-03-20 19:27 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-21 23:39 Re: __thread
• 2003-03-21 23:42 Re: how to implement pipeline errata?
• 2003-03-24 18:49 Re: wwwdocs/bugzilla/docs/images caution.gif note.gif tip.gif warning.gif
• 2003-03-25 22:23 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-25 22:26 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-26 23:42 updated 3.2.3 bug fix list (for release notes)
• 2003-03-27 20:18 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-27 22:42 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3
• 2003-03-31 16:49 Re: c++ question

Joern Rennecke

• 2003-03-06 16:47 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-19 12:30 Re: Reload question

John David Anglin

• 2003-03-01 19:32 [PATCH]: Stack alignment - take 2
• 2003-03-03 20:47 Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns?
• 2003-03-03 22:20 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns?
• 2003-03-04 00:17 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns?
• 2003-03-04 05:24 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns?
• 2003-03-04 07:40 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns?
• 2003-03-06 01:16 bootstrap failure on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 with trunk
• 2003-03-07 18:34 Re: Mainline infinite recursion on ia64
• 2003-03-09 20:11 [PATCH]: Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns?
• 2003-03-10 01:11 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-03-11 01:46 Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x
• 2003-03-12 20:20 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-18 21:36 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 23:54 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-19 00:40 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-19 19:21 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)

John Levon

• 2003-03-05 00:54 [PATCH] Warn on always-false BIT_AND_EXPRs (PR 9944)
• 2003-03-13 10:40 Array subscript has type 'char' and constant expressions
• 2003-03-13 11:14 Re: Array subscript has type 'char' and constant expressions

Jon Beniston

• 2003-03-12 09:42 Supporting multiple instructions sets within a single machine description
• 2003-03-13 10:14 Modulo scheduling in GCC

Jonah Graham

• 2003-03-21 00:35 Re: Additional GCC warnings?

Jonathan Larmour

• 2003-03-20 18:39 Re: __thread
• 2003-03-21 00:21 Re: __thread

Josef Zlomek

• 2003-03-05 22:00 Re: Bootstrap failure on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, trunk
• 2003-03-05 22:03 Re: Bootstrap failure on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, trunk
• 2003-03-05 22:24 Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline)
• 2003-03-06 12:39 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline)
• 2003-03-06 14:12 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline)
• 2003-03-06 14:27 Re: Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 (mainline)
• 2003-03-10 16:35 Re: [rtlopt] Location list data
• 2003-03-10 16:43 Re: [rtlopt] Location list data

Joseph S. Myers

• 2003-03-01 10:48 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrom make check*
• 2003-03-01 16:23 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrom make check*
• 2003-03-01 16:31 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree
• 2003-03-03 09:14 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrommake check*
• 2003-03-05 09:40 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 19:41 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-08 19:00 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions
• 2003-03-10 10:20 Re: future of gccbug bug reporting script?
• 2003-03-12 01:42 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-13 13:25 Re: There is errors in the translation of gcc
• 2003-03-13 23:39 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-18 19:05 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-21 07:58 Re: Additional GCC warnings?
• 2003-03-21 22:16 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-22 09:15 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover

Josh Fryman

• 2003-03-05 16:49 why doesn't "--program-prefix=<foo>" work?
• 2003-03-05 17:29 Re: why doesn't "--program-prefix=<foo>" work?
• 2003-03-06 21:31 gcc-3.2.2 for armv5b - big endian not the default?
• 2003-03-13 01:33 Re: why doesn't "--program-prefix=<foo>" work?

Jurica Baricevic

• 2003-03-24 11:34 Vr4131

Justin Piszcz

• 2003-03-16 23:37 GCC 3.2.2 Compiler Error With Pentium 4
• 2003-03-19 05:06 Problem with 3.2.2 build. -- JAVA Problem?

Kai Henningsen

• 2003-03-04 20:07 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames
• 2003-03-30 22:08 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite

Kaoru Fukui

• 2003-03-08 04:30 Why is subversions.gnu.org locked for long time?

Karel Gardas

• 2003-03-03 10:31 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch
• 2003-03-03 12:10 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch
• 2003-03-03 14:21 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch
• 2003-03-03 18:03 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch
• 2003-03-04 20:50 Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)
• 2003-03-05 22:04 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 07:30 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 22:23 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 10:27 c++ compilation perf. comparison (gcc, icc, como) [was: Re: Suggestionsfor improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?]
• 2003-03-07 11:15 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 20:41 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 20:51 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-10 18:32 pch messages [was: Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilationspeed?]
• 2003-03-18 12:26 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 12:28 Re: Speed discussion ...
• 2003-03-18 13:21 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 13:22 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 15:09 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 15:25 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2003-03-01 04:55 Re: GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86 (patch?)
• 2003-03-01 15:56 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-03-01 16:21 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-03-04 05:43 GCC 3.3 to include powerpc-darwin as an evaluation platform
• 2003-03-04 14:36 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-03-04 14:49 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-03-04 15:58 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 16:09 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 05:13 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX
• 2003-03-07 02:52 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 15:26 Re: Compile time speed
• 2003-03-07 22:16 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-09 23:34 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-03-10 02:02 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-03-10 18:08 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-03-13 13:45 GCC 3.3: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu added to secondary evaluation platforms
• 2003-03-15 01:40 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-15 15:20 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-17 23:19 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX
• 2003-03-18 21:16 Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX
• 2003-03-25 17:52 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-28 23:28 Re: sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9?
• 2003-03-29 02:58 Re: sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9?
• 2003-03-29 17:16 Bootstrap failure building libjava on sparc-solaris2 caused by fix-header

Kenneth . Simpson

• 2003-03-10 20:22 vtable in read-only sections

Kenny Simpson

• 2003-03-10 21:39 vtable in read-only sections [again]

Kevin Atkinson

• 2003-03-06 00:49 Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-06 01:21 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-06 01:44 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-06 02:55 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-06 03:11 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-06 20:23 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-08 02:00 Exceptions, C, and Gcc
• 2003-03-08 02:17 Re: Exceptions, C, and Gcc

Kevin B. Hendricks

• 2003-03-19 12:39 Re: Darwin gcc 3.3 sizeof of C++ structures with long long ints is strange
• 2003-03-19 12:51 Re: Darwin gcc 3.3 sizeof of C++ structures with long long ints is strange
• 2003-03-20 02:19 Re: Darwin gcc 3.3 sizeof of C++ structures with long long ints is strange
• 2003-03-25 16:23 Re: On alignment
• 2003-03-25 18:46 Re: On alignment

Kevin Handy

• 2003-03-14 17:30 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)

Kiran Kumar

• 2003-03-31 15:29 record_effective_endpoints

Kris Warkentin

• 2003-03-19 12:38 Re: do I need cygwin for gcc on pc?

Kumar Gala

• 2003-03-04 15:26 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant
• 2003-03-11 21:58 Re: TARGET_STRING problem on ppc

Kurt Garloff

• 2003-03-02 16:06 [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387)
• 2003-03-05 19:18 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387)
• 2003-03-06 02:01 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387)

Lars Brinkhoff

• 2003-03-12 17:01 Re: What optimizations does -O1 enable?
• 2003-03-15 18:58 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc
• 2003-03-15 22:37 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc

Lars Segerlund

• 2003-03-04 13:57 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 15:05 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 15:19 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 07:41 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 07:53 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 11:05 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 11:19 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 11:25 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-12 11:48 the bugs database ...
• 2003-03-13 14:19 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 11:10 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 12:02 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 12:19 Speed discussion ...
• 2003-03-24 16:15 Question about boehmgc

Laurent Guerby

• 2003-03-04 22:51 Donation to the GCC project is now handled by FSF
• 2003-03-08 01:46 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-08 22:57 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions
• 2003-03-14 20:31 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported configurationstyles?
• 2003-03-27 22:07 Re: Ada: Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7
• 2003-03-27 22:35 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-28 07:29 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-28 11:36 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-28 11:50 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-28 11:56 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-28 12:06 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-28 19:46 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-29 08:32 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-29 08:43 Re: improving testing scheme (was Re: ACATS and GCC testsuite)
• 2003-03-29 09:16 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-29 17:12 Re: Ada: Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7
• 2003-03-30 10:31 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-30 15:31 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite

law

• 2003-03-03 16:07 Re: [tree-ssa] coding style for structure fields
• 2003-03-04 00:02 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns?
• 2003-03-06 16:14 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns?
• 2003-03-07 23:19 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-10 15:55 Re: [tree-ssa] unSSA questions and missing reference.
• 2003-03-11 01:08 Re: gprof inaccuracy
• 2003-03-12 14:56 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-17 20:31 [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue
• 2003-03-17 21:07 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue
• 2003-03-17 21:29 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue
• 2003-03-18 20:24 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue
• 2003-03-18 22:34 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue
• 2003-03-24 22:06 [tree-ssa] C++ Question
• 2003-03-24 22:58 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ Question
• 2003-03-25 14:02 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ EH question
• 2003-03-25 18:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Grammar for GIMPLE condexprs
• 2003-03-26 21:31 Re: New Port Contribution
• 2003-03-26 23:08 Re: New Port Contribution

Loic Dachary

• 2003-03-19 10:15 GCC anonymous CVS
• 2003-03-20 09:17 Re: GCC anonymous CVS

Loren James Rittle

• 2003-03-14 08:00 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure
• 2003-03-14 08:33 Time to update documentation regarding supported configuration styles?
• 2003-03-14 09:44 Time to update documentation regarding supported make implementations?
• 2003-03-14 17:26 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure
• 2003-03-14 21:52 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported make implementations?
• 2003-03-17 23:59 HOWTO: Test in-src build without requiring much extra disk space

Louie Chan

• 2003-03-15 19:44 Can the function "connect()" & "listen() + accept()" be used with the same TCP port at the same time ?
• 2003-03-16 06:18 Can the function "connect()" & "listen() + accept()" be used with the same TCP port at the same time ?

Lovely Aki

• 2003-03-10 10:29 Problems getting gcc from CVS

Ludovic Courtès

• 2003-03-28 10:37 Stab string field for array types

M. Lavasani

• 2003-03-03 16:33 Re: HP-UX 11 porting error: PARSE ERROR in malloc.h
• 2003-03-04 10:23 gcc-3.3 failed to compile

Manish Makkar

• 2003-03-27 11:24 Problem with TLS initialization

Marc Espie

• 2003-03-05 16:31 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end

Marek Michalkiewicz

• 2003-03-20 08:04 AVR target broken in mainline - abort in expand_mult

Mark Ferrell

• 2003-03-04 19:45 Re: Target deprecation, round four

Mark Mitchell

• 2003-03-01 01:38 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-03-03 05:21 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-03-05 02:19 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 07:00 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-03-05 17:57 Re: Implementing unit-at-a-time for C++
• 2003-03-05 18:42 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 23:03 Re: Implementing unit-at-a-time for C++
• 2003-03-06 16:45 Re: gcc 3.2 -> gcc 3.3 ABI change
• 2003-03-06 19:21 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387)
• 2003-03-06 19:48 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387)
• 2003-03-06 20:36 Deprecating/Removing Targets
• 2003-03-06 21:38 Re: Question about PR/9447
• 2003-03-08 08:45 Re: gcc 3.2 -> gcc 3.3 ABI change
• 2003-03-11 07:41 Re: C++ front-end question
• 2003-03-11 07:51 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-11 19:14 Target Deprecation
• 2003-03-11 21:08 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-11 21:31 GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-11 21:46 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-11 21:46 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-11 21:49 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-12 03:36 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-12 07:46 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-12 18:03 RE: Target Deprecation
• 2003-03-12 18:05 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-17 05:55 XFAILing V3 tests.
• 2003-03-17 07:18 Re: XFAILing V3 tests.
• 2003-03-17 20:46 Re: XFAILing V3 tests.
• 2003-03-20 23:18 PR 8730
• 2003-03-21 19:26 GCC 3.3 release
• 2003-03-21 19:31 GCC 3.3: inline-asm problems
• 2003-03-21 19:35 Optimization patches
• 2003-03-21 20:25 Re: Optimization patches
• 2003-03-21 21:22 Re: GCC 3.3: inline-asm problems
• 2003-03-22 02:57 Re: GCC 3.3 release
• 2003-03-23 22:14 PR opt/8414
• 2003-03-23 22:26 Re: PR opt/8414
• 2003-03-24 08:25 PR 9772
• 2003-03-24 08:27 PR optimization/9745
• 2003-03-24 18:20 Re: PR optimization/9745
• 2003-03-24 18:22 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-24 18:51 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-24 19:21 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-24 21:02 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-25 06:42 Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-25 17:07 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-26 21:23 Re: On alignment
• 2003-03-30 19:14 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-31 18:34 3.3 PRs
• 2003-03-31 20:06 PR 8730
• 2003-03-31 20:08 Re: PR 8730
• 2003-03-31 21:32 Re: 3.3 PRs

Martin York

• 2003-03-25 15:11 RE: INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS(): bug?

Marty Hauff

• 2003-03-06 01:13 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-06 09:17 Retargetting GCC for fictitious processors

Mathieu Roy

• 2003-03-20 00:29 Re: GCC anonymous CVS

Matt Austern

• 2003-03-04 19:51 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 23:07 Re: wrong C++ warning "fix" last year
• 2003-03-05 18:46 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 00:22 Build failure in libstdc++
• 2003-03-07 00:51 Re: Build failure in libstdc++
• 2003-03-14 17:55 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 18:51 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 17:47 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 17:59 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 18:39 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-24 19:56 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-24 20:17 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS

Matt Kraai

• 2003-03-26 16:07 Re: REQ_EQUAL and mems hoisted out of loops

Matt Reppert

• 2003-03-14 16:21 Re: Amazingly Slow GCC anon CVS access

Matt Thomas

• 2003-03-03 18:35 PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant
• 2003-03-03 21:06 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant
• 2003-03-04 17:20 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant

Matthias Klose

• 2003-03-01 17:56 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-03-02 17:12 [3.3 branch regression] libjava build failure on arm-linux
• 2003-03-09 22:33 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-03-09 22:37 future of gccbug bug reporting script?
• 2003-03-17 06:46 Re: XFAILing V3 tests.

Matthieu Moy

• 2003-03-24 15:56 Using GCC's front-end to parse SystemC
• 2003-03-28 12:03 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite

mcblane

• 2003-03-13 22:52 are you ready?
• 2003-03-13 22:53 are you ready?

Mehdi Khaldi

• 2003-03-19 20:54 problem when build gcc
• 2003-03-20 19:45 build gcc

Michael Elizabeth Chastain

• 2003-03-03 14:54 Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh?
• 2003-03-08 19:58 cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c
• 2003-03-09 06:31 Re: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c
• 2003-03-11 06:46 gcc gcc-3_3-branch has configure.in newer than configure
• 2003-03-11 18:39 Re: gcc gcc-3_3-branch has configure.in newer than configure

Michael Hayes

• 2003-03-21 02:09 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure

Michael Matz

• 2003-03-03 19:59 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-04 11:55 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-04 14:59 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 17:18 wrong C++ warning "fix" last year
• 2003-03-04 21:31 Re: compile server design document
• 2003-03-04 21:38 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 21:44 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 21:48 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 22:03 Re: compile server design document
• 2003-03-04 22:39 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 11:59 Re: wrong C++ warning "fix" last year
• 2003-03-06 11:08 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-06 16:14 Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?
• 2003-03-06 22:09 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387)
• 2003-03-06 22:16 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 23:16 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-10 20:24 Re: preprocess_constraints, reg-stack.c and register classes
• 2003-03-10 21:47 Re: preprocess_constraints, reg-stack.c and register classes
• 2003-03-13 19:43 gcc not recognizing all C99 hex float constants
• 2003-03-17 14:34 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-18 12:29 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 12:33 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 15:09 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 15:12 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 15:19 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 23:42 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-19 20:06 Re: __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generates broken code
• 2003-03-21 15:18 Re: On alignment

Michael Meeks

• 2003-03-05 17:25 strange g++ -D behavior,
• 2003-03-05 19:11 Re: strange g++ -D behavior,

Michael Ritzert

• 2003-03-06 09:13 Re: bootstrap failure on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 with trunk
• 2003-03-27 08:49 Ada: Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7
• 2003-03-28 07:49 Re: Ada: Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7

Michael S . Zick

• 2003-03-01 00:42 Re: gcc and include dirs
• 2003-03-01 13:23 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-03-01 13:36 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree
• 2003-03-01 13:38 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree
• 2003-03-01 16:42 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree
• 2003-03-01 22:52 Re: gcc and include dirs
• 2003-03-01 23:44 Re: gcc and include dirs
• 2003-03-03 13:31 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regression on gcc3.3 branch
• 2003-03-03 13:39 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrom make check*
• 2003-03-03 22:51 GCC Infrastructure File
• 2003-03-04 13:52 Re: Please clear my doubt
• 2003-03-05 01:43 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 16:41 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-07 13:33 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 13:39 Re: Compile time speed

michel-friedman

• 2003-03-21 11:16 Ready for an Assigment in dangerous Zone like middle East

Mike Stump

• 2003-03-03 19:45 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependency from make check*
• 2003-03-05 00:34 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 00:50 Re: Please clear my doubt
• 2003-03-05 19:10 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 01:10 PCH distcc improvements
• 2003-03-06 01:36 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-06 03:09 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-06 03:25 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-06 22:23 Re: Retargetting GCC for fictitious processors
• 2003-03-07 19:04 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 19:39 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 23:24 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 23:35 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-10 18:22 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-10 20:22 target_flags
• 2003-03-11 00:45 Re: pch messages [was: Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?]
• 2003-03-11 01:38 Re: target_flags
• 2003-03-11 01:39 Re: target_flags
• 2003-03-12 00:04 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-12 18:12 Re: the bugs database ...
• 2003-03-13 03:15 Re: GCC suggestions
• 2003-03-13 03:20 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-13 21:36 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-13 22:09 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-14 00:49 unique test case names for gcc debug.exp and pch.exp
• 2003-03-14 19:52 Re: unique test case names for gcc debug.exp and pch.exp
• 2003-03-14 21:35 Re: symbol resolution
• 2003-03-17 19:16 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 19:25 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc
• 2003-03-17 21:48 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup
• 2003-03-19 23:05 Re: gengtype and typedef to enum
• 2003-03-20 21:53 Re: Additional GCC warnings?
• 2003-03-21 20:46 Re: gcc for any microcontroller?
• 2003-03-24 20:55 Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS
• 2003-03-25 20:38 Re: ld.so mechanism
• 2003-03-28 18:30 Re: Microchip Porting... HELP!
• 2003-03-28 21:57 Re: Namespace for <cfoo> headers incorrect?
• 2003-03-31 18:13 Re: [PATCH] Duplicate entries in contrib.texi

MKAOUAR Mohamed

• 2003-03-07 14:07 Question

Morris Muller

• 2003-03-31 21:03 compiler error

NASET,JEFFREY (HP-Richardson,ex1)

• 2003-03-14 23:22 RE: Tail recursion problem (ptr_mode != Pmode)

Nathan Sidwell

• 2003-03-04 12:46 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 16:30 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 16:35 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 08:48 Re: Target deprecation, round four
• 2003-03-13 12:03 Re: Turning off gcov build for embedded processor
• 2003-03-13 14:18 Re: Turning off gcov build for embedded processor
• 2003-03-17 11:56 Re: RFC: mp = &o.f;

Nathanael Nerode

• 2003-03-01 05:09 Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree
• 2003-03-01 05:22 Re: Proposal: Require that GAS be built before GCC in a unified tree
• 2003-03-01 17:52 Object files know where they're built?!?
• 2003-03-02 01:58 Re: Object files know where they're built?!?
• 2003-03-04 08:47 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 09:53 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 16:40 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 16:49 Re: Target deprecation, round four
• 2003-03-04 17:53 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 06:17 Re: enable-languages=c doesn't turn off libstdc++ any more?
• 2003-03-06 20:16 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-12 01:42 Sorting out the directories in Makefile.in
• 2003-03-12 21:32 Re: libstdc++/1773: __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L
• 2003-03-13 03:21 ChangeLog rotation time?
• 2003-03-14 20:03 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported configuration styles?
• 2003-03-14 20:10 Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?)
• 2003-03-14 20:38 gcc/configure.in assembler search
• 2003-03-14 21:24 Re: Time to update documentaion regarding supported configuration style
• 2003-03-17 00:02 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported configurationstyles?
• 2003-03-21 07:26 'xm_defines=POSIX'
• 2003-03-22 00:25 Bugzilla switchover
• 2003-03-22 01:56 Re: GCC 3.3 release
• 2003-03-28 00:58 What autogen is needed for GCC?
• 2003-03-28 23:25 improving testing scheme (was Re: ACATS and GCC testsuite)
• 2003-03-31 18:45 Re: review process

Neal D. Becker

• 2003-03-11 14:51 proposal: Default settings from environment
• 2003-03-11 17:51 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment
• 2003-03-11 18:21 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment
• 2003-03-11 18:35 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment

Neil Booth

• 2003-03-01 21:14 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag (patches for gcc3.3)
• 2003-03-01 21:49 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag (patches for gcc3.3)
• 2003-03-02 14:11 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag (patches for gcc3.3)
• 2003-03-02 21:51 Re: IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C failure due to cpplib patch
• 2003-03-02 21:58 Re: IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C failure due to cpplib patch
• 2003-03-02 22:02 Re: IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C failure due to cpplib patch
• 2003-03-03 06:46 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-03-03 21:42 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames
• 2003-03-04 00:00 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames
• 2003-03-04 21:10 FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-03-04 22:03 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-03-04 22:32 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-03-04 22:49 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-03-04 23:06 Re: Donation to the GCC project is now handled by FSF
• 2003-03-05 07:07 Re: [PATCH] Warn on always-false BIT_AND_EXPRs (PR 9944)
• 2003-03-06 07:08 Re: configure --with-sysroot
• 2003-03-06 07:18 Re: PCH distcc improvements
• 2003-03-06 20:49 Re: configure --with-sysroot
• 2003-03-07 20:23 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 22:20 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 23:02 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 23:07 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-08 15:27 Stormy16 doesn't build
• 2003-03-08 21:01 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions
• 2003-03-13 19:26 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-13 20:22 Re: gcc not recognizing all C99 hex float constants
• 2003-03-13 21:59 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-13 23:34 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-15 21:19 Re: alloca + inline
• 2003-03-17 20:33 Re: timing of lexical analysis in -ftime-report
• 2003-03-18 21:04 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-19 07:07 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-21 00:00 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3

Nick Clifton

• 2003-03-13 17:54 Re: profiling API?

Nitin Gupta

• 2003-03-21 12:16 Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited
• 2003-03-24 14:40 Command Options/Compiler Passes page not updated.
• 2003-03-24 15:21 RE: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited
• 2003-03-25 15:20 RE: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited

Oliver Kellogg

• 2003-03-04 16:57 [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
• 2003-03-04 20:37 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
• 2003-03-04 20:50 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed

Olivier Galibert

• 2003-03-04 13:49 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 14:35 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 15:06 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 15:42 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 07:53 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-13 12:35 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 11:11 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)

Olivier Hainque

• 2003-03-05 10:51 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (warning regression)
• 2003-03-13 08:20 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-13 08:46 Re: GCC 3.3

Oscar Fuentes

• 2003-03-18 21:02 Re: Speed discussion ...

Paolo Bonzini

• 2003-03-04 16:01 Re: Turning off C++ casting?

Paolo Carlini

• 2003-03-01 21:16 Optimizing GCC
• 2003-03-14 13:54 Re: bootstrap failure in libstdc++-v3
• 2003-03-18 20:57 [RFH] Puzzling behaviour with a wstring constructor
• 2003-03-21 09:39 Re: GCC Infrastructure File
• 2003-03-29 19:51 Re: Cerr error

Paul Jarc

• 2003-03-11 19:05 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment
• 2003-03-14 21:36 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regardingsupported make implementations?)

Paul Schlie

• 2003-03-05 02:30 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once

pberger2

• 2003-03-04 03:34 Configuring GCC

Per Bothner

• 2003-03-04 21:14 Re: compile server design document
• 2003-03-04 21:50 Re: compile server design document
• 2003-03-07 02:19 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 20:40 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 21:22 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-20 00:23 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup

Peter A. Buhr

• 2003-03-01 21:46 Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag (patches for gcc3.3)

Peter Barada

• 2003-03-07 01:22 tix fails to build for m68k-elf
• 2003-03-07 23:20 Re: tix fails to build for m68k-elf
• 2003-03-12 14:51 ColdFire tweaked gcc available for download

Peter Bergner

• 2003-03-04 14:53 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant
• 2003-03-04 18:28 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant

Petko Manolov

• 2003-03-10 11:19 printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x
• 2003-03-10 12:18 Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x
• 2003-03-10 12:30 Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x
• 2003-03-11 05:47 Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x

Petr Danecek

• 2003-03-21 12:23 gcc for any microcontroller?
• 2003-03-24 15:30 Re: gcc for any microcontroller?

Phil Edwards

• 2003-03-04 17:36 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 17:40 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-10 03:20 [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-10 04:13 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-10 05:15 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-10 05:50 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-11 17:16 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment
• 2003-03-11 17:33 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-11 17:33 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-11 18:56 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment
• 2003-03-11 19:04 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment
• 2003-03-11 22:37 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-12 23:05 Re: wstring in gcc
• 2003-03-14 17:29 Re: Wrong as/ld picked by gcc configure
• 2003-03-14 17:37 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported configuration styles?
• 2003-03-14 21:15 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported configuration styles?
• 2003-03-15 21:54 Re: Patch submission process
• 2003-03-21 00:25 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-21 23:29 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-25 21:41 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-31 16:42 Re: review process
• 2003-03-31 18:13 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-31 18:47 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover
• 2003-03-31 21:11 Re: compiler error

Philipp Thomas

• 2003-03-25 17:38 Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported?
• 2003-03-27 08:57 Re: Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported?
• 2003-03-27 09:41 Re: Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported?
• 2003-03-27 18:12 Re: Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported?

Piotr Wyderski

• 2003-03-01 19:33 Assembly code parametriaztion
• 2003-03-01 20:27 Re: Assembly code parametriaztion
• 2003-03-12 21:41 attribute(at)
• 2003-03-18 19:56 Re: __attribute__ ((aligned)) weirdness

Pony Hunter

• 2003-03-09 05:58 May I Have Permission To...

poschmid

• 2003-03-23 04:30 Results for g++ 3.3 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-03-24 20:15 Lapack test suite results for gcc 3.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-03-25 23:06 Re: Lapack test suite results for gcc 3.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-03-27 02:05 gcc 3.3 versus bench++
• 2003-03-28 04:07 Re: Lapack test suite results for gcc 3.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu

Postmaster

• 2003-03-25 17:03 Non-Delivery Warning

Pradeep Kumar

• 2003-03-14 06:27 Problem with Usage of GNU GCC compiler with VC++

Pramod Kumar Swami

• 2003-03-16 07:47 GCC-3.2.1 behavior on p3/p4

rahul bapat

• 2003-03-19 06:58 gcc command syntax

Rainer Orth

• 2003-03-26 20:56 Re: bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut.

Raja R Harinath

• 2003-03-15 15:34 Re: Why is subversions.gnu.org locked for long time?
• 2003-03-25 19:54 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-25 21:57 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-25 22:23 Re: Converting to ISO C89

Ramana Radhakrishnan

• 2003-03-31 07:22 a problem with weak and alias attributes

Randy.Dunlap

• 2003-03-04 17:35 automated sizeof usage?

Redação Comercial

• 2003-03-14 09:24 300 Modelos de Cartas comerciais, avisos, convites, propostas, etc.
• 2003-03-14 09:29 300 Modelos de Cartas comerciais, avisos, convites, propostas, etc.

reg

• 2003-03-06 23:07 Does g77 have the equivalent of -r8 ???

reinhard . jessich

• 2003-03-12 23:53 How to rename data and bss sections for powerpc-eabi?

Richard Almquist

• 2003-03-17 00:11 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)

Richard Earnshaw

• 2003-03-01 11:29 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation
• 2003-03-01 13:59 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
• 2003-03-01 19:11 Re: Object files know where they're built?!?
• 2003-03-03 17:25 Re: rfc: replacing fp-bit with glibc's soft-fp implementation
• 2003-03-03 17:27 Re: mixing LGPL and GPL in gcc
• 2003-03-04 10:19 Re: Target deprecation, round four
• 2003-03-04 11:43 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 14:01 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 14:21 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 14:46 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 15:11 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 18:37 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 19:48 Re: Target deprecation, round four
• 2003-03-06 10:18 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 18:08 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 10:21 Re: gcc-3.2.2 for armv5b - big endian not the default?
• 2003-03-07 10:27 Re: Deprecating/Removing Targets
• 2003-03-12 10:48 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment
• 2003-03-12 11:25 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-13 09:46 Re: Supporting multiple instructions sets within a single machine description
• 2003-03-13 09:51 Re: ChangeLog rotation time?
• 2003-03-13 09:56 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-13 13:49 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-13 14:00 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 10:49 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 17:25 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 13:09 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 13:28 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-15 14:22 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-15 18:08 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-15 18:24 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-15 18:39 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 09:33 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-17 10:14 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-18 11:40 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-20 11:16 Re: __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generates broken code
• 2003-03-21 11:21 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure

Richard Guenther

• 2003-03-07 10:11 Compile time speed
• 2003-03-10 09:49 Re: gcc and inlining
• 2003-03-10 11:59 Re: gcc and inlining
• 2003-03-12 21:09 -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-13 09:08 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-13 09:29 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-13 10:21 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-13 10:43 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-13 21:16 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 12:14 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 12:56 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 14:50 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 15:02 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 15:07 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 15:19 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 15:20 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 15:33 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 16:35 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-23 19:01 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-23 22:22 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-24 08:47 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-24 10:06 3.3 Bootstrap failure (was Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%))
• 2003-03-24 13:43 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-25 14:18 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)

Richard Henderson

• 2003-03-01 01:21 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-03-01 02:05 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-03-03 17:49 Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2
• 2003-03-03 21:46 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns?
• 2003-03-03 23:12 Re: inline-asm/9910: gcc dies on inline assembly
• 2003-03-03 23:23 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant
• 2003-03-03 23:28 Re: Intel 386 and AMD x86-64 Options
• 2003-03-04 00:55 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns?
• 2003-03-04 00:57 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns?
• 2003-03-04 02:27 Re: [PATCH]: Stack alignment - take 2
• 2003-03-04 07:32 Re: Is the loop pass allowed to introduce new call insns?
• 2003-03-06 18:25 Re: java status
• 2003-03-07 00:01 Re: -gstabs in ia64
• 2003-03-10 08:41 Re: rfc: unwinder, ppc-spe dual sized registers, and a patch...
• 2003-03-13 22:34 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory
• 2003-03-13 22:36 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory
• 2003-03-13 22:37 Re: backend question in alpha nobwx
• 2003-03-14 18:35 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported make implementations?
• 2003-03-14 21:11 Re: store double-cvtd-to-int to memory
• 2003-03-14 23:10 Re: Tail recursion problem (ptr_mode != Pmode)
• 2003-03-15 01:44 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-15 20:25 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-16 01:59 Re: alloca + inline
• 2003-03-17 21:33 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue
• 2003-03-17 21:46 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue
• 2003-03-18 00:25 Re: i386.c: general_no_elim_operand
• 2003-03-18 18:00 Re: i386.c: general_no_elim_operand
• 2003-03-18 22:47 Re: [tree-ssa] C++ CFG issue
• 2003-03-20 21:48 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap failure
• 2003-03-20 21:55 Re: __thread
• 2003-03-20 22:00 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
• 2003-03-20 22:31 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
• 2003-03-21 07:12 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
• 2003-03-21 07:45 Re: __thread
• 2003-03-21 07:46 Re: how to implement pipeline errata?
• 2003-03-21 07:51 Re: how to implement pipeline errata?
• 2003-03-21 20:26 Re: ifcvt question
• 2003-03-21 20:31 Re: GCC 3.3: inline-asm problems
• 2003-03-23 01:30 Re: ifcvt question
• 2003-03-26 23:01 Re: CONSTANT_ADDRESS_P for i386/x86-64
• 2003-03-27 01:53 Re: Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported?
• 2003-03-27 01:57 Re: A nice improvement in GCC-3.3
• 2003-03-27 02:11 Re: Dwarf2 question
• 2003-03-27 09:18 Re: Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported?
• 2003-03-27 09:20 Re: Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported?
• 2003-03-27 19:05 Re: First scheduling pass
• 2003-03-27 19:07 Re: First scheduling pass
• 2003-03-27 19:15 Re: Problem with TLS initialization
• 2003-03-27 23:49 Re: REQ_EQUAL and mems hoisted out of loops
• 2003-03-28 19:19 Re: Exceptions in 2.7.2
• 2003-03-29 00:27 Re: sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9?
• 2003-03-30 03:26 Re: sparcv9 or sparc64 for solaris2.9?
• 2003-03-31 18:22 Re: record_effective_endpoints
• 2003-03-31 18:59 Re: review process

Richard Kenner

• 2003-03-14 02:15 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 23:25 i386.c: general_no_elim_operand
• 2003-03-18 02:26 Re: i386.c: general_no_elim_operand
• 2003-03-18 18:14 Re: i386.c: general_no_elim_operand
• 2003-03-23 10:34 Re: PR 8730
• 2003-03-24 10:46 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
• 2003-03-26 14:58 Re: rli->unpadded_align
• 2003-03-26 17:26 Re: rli->unpadded_align
• 2003-03-28 02:12 Problems with "make check"
• 2003-03-28 10:36 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-28 11:40 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-28 11:52 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-28 11:58 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-28 14:53 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-29 11:22 Re: improving testing scheme (was Re: ACATS and GCC testsuite)
• 2003-03-29 14:04 Re: improving testing scheme (was Re: ACATS and GCC testsuite)
• 2003-03-30 19:10 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-31 19:54 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
• 2003-03-31 20:07 Re: PR 8730
• 2003-03-31 20:19 Re: PR 8730

Richard Sandiford

• 2003-03-19 14:22 Re: Questions about match_scratch in machine description files

Rick Albright

• 2003-03-27 16:37 gcc question

Ritzert

• 2003-03-29 15:11 Re: Ada: Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7

Rob Savoye

• 2003-03-14 01:23 Re: [Bug-dejagnu] unique test case names for gcc debug.exp and pch.exp

Rob Taylor

• 2003-03-14 11:41 RE: profiling API?

Robert Dewar

• 2003-03-04 20:29 Re: Optimizing GCC
• 2003-03-04 20:36 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
• 2003-03-04 21:56 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
• 2003-03-05 03:43 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 14:24 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 22:42 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 02:04 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-06 02:58 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-06 03:24 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-06 03:25 Re: Extending Gcc For a New Language
• 2003-03-08 17:26 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-08 17:37 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-13 23:12 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 01:11 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 02:46 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 02:54 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 03:00 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 03:17 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 17:17 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 17:29 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 17:33 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 18:03 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 18:08 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-14 18:53 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 11:34 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 13:47 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-15 17:51 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-15 18:27 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 19:19 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 19:20 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 19:28 Re: [3.3 regression?] flag_hosted and back-ends
• 2003-03-15 19:30 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 19:32 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 19:33 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc
• 2003-03-15 20:09 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 21:37 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 21:40 Re: alloca + inline
• 2003-03-15 21:41 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-15 21:43 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-16 14:44 Re: alloca + inline
• 2003-03-16 14:52 Re: alloca + inline
• 2003-03-16 15:30 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 04:38 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 14:55 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 19:46 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 19:50 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 02:47 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 03:16 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 14:43 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-27 03:32 Re: Should typedef'd unnamed structs be supported?
• 2003-03-28 13:59 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-29 13:28 Re: improving testing scheme (was Re: ACATS and GCC testsuite)
• 2003-03-30 15:46 Re: ACATS & GCC testsuite
• 2003-03-31 20:16 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover

Robert McNulty Junior

• 2003-03-08 22:17 Checking out gcc
• 2003-03-09 06:50 RE: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c
• 2003-03-09 22:13 logging into subversions
• 2003-03-09 22:30 CVS main tree
• 2003-03-10 06:34 CVS bailing out when downloading trunk
• 2003-03-11 04:17 Locked tight on trunk
• 2003-03-14 22:44 locked again

Robert Myers

• 2003-03-16 16:14 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc

Robert Schiele

• 2003-03-08 23:42 Re: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c
• 2003-03-09 00:10 Re: cvs corrruption in gcc/unroll.c
• 2003-03-13 10:29 Re: cross gcc help needed

Roger Sayle

• 2003-03-29 15:51 [PATCH] Duplicate entries in contrib.texi

Roman Zippel

• 2003-03-08 19:48 alias problem during loop pass

Ross Smith

• 2003-03-17 19:19 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 05:57 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 17:31 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-21 06:37 Re: Additional GCC warnings?

Rupert Wood

• 2003-03-04 11:25 RE: Putting C++ code into gcc front end

Russ Allbery

• 2003-03-14 18:25 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported makeimplementations?
• 2003-03-26 20:43 Re: bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut.

Russell Shaw

• 2003-03-06 06:29 C optimizer bug
• 2003-03-07 01:56 Re: Deprecating/Removing Targets
• 2003-03-07 02:07 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 12:42 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?

Ryan Braby

• 2003-03-10 18:21 Stale CVS Lock?
• 2003-03-10 18:59 Re: Stale CVS Lock?

S. Bosscher

• 2003-03-13 14:00 RE: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-19 21:08 RE: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-31 09:08 RE: Building OpenOffice with GCJ?

Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida

• 2003-03-27 10:04 First scheduling pass
• 2003-03-27 11:17 RE: First scheduling pass
• 2003-03-29 11:47 RE: First scheduling pass
• 2003-03-31 10:08 infinite loop in find_rgns

Sarah Staar

• 2003-03-28 19:48 New Videos on Trannylife.com
• 2003-03-28 19:49 New Videos on Trannylife.com

Sarnath Kannan

• 2003-03-28 07:09 Compiler directed Page coloring

Scott Dudley

• 2003-03-11 00:47 gprof inaccuracy

Scott Robert Ladd

• 2003-03-02 01:15 RE: Optimizing GCC
• 2003-03-21 01:58 Automatic vectorization?

Sean McNeil

• 2003-03-11 01:26 CVS on subversions
• 2003-03-12 20:06 GCC 3.3 and CP patch for -include switch
• 2003-03-12 20:12 GCC 3.3 and CP patch for -include switch
• 2003-03-18 09:20 A mailing list for architectural changes?

Segher Boessenkool

• 2003-03-17 00:32 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 00:32 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 00:32 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-22 03:19 Re: Additional GCC warnings?
• 2003-03-31 05:17 Re: long long bit-fields
• 2003-03-31 05:17 Re: what is the meaning of '*'?

Shiv Sheshgiri

• 2003-03-31 09:23 Peephole2 Null Patterns

Siarhei Yermalayeu

• 2003-03-20 17:15 Problem with operator new on ARM

Singh, Diwakar V

• 2003-03-07 22:55 Using DLLs created with different compilers

Spundun Bhatt

• 2003-03-13 05:55 backend question in alpha nobwx
• 2003-03-15 03:33 Re: backend question in alpha nobwx
• 2003-03-19 00:43 define_delay working only when optimization on!
• 2003-03-21 00:25 how much work is it to port a backend from 2.95.3 to head: was Re:define_delay working only when optimization on!
• 2003-03-21 00:29 Re: define_delay working only when optimization on!
• 2003-03-21 00:38 how to implement pipeline errata?

sriram_ns

• 2003-03-20 10:48 Parse error with xscale_be-g++ compiler

stefan . marquardt

• 2003-03-03 14:27 HP-UX 11 porting error: PARSE ERROR in malloc.h
• 2003-03-03 17:37 Re: HP-UX 11 porting error: PARSE ERROR in malloc.h

Stephane Carrez

• 2003-03-24 20:05 Re: gcc for any microcontroller?
• 2003-03-24 22:33 Re: gcc for any microcontroller?

Steven Bosscher

• 2003-03-03 07:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-03-02
• 2003-03-04 17:06 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 12:24 return warning "regressions" on the tree-ssa branch
• 2003-03-08 00:19 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-10 15:14 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions
• 2003-03-10 18:34 Re: Stale CVS Lock?
• 2003-03-11 18:28 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment
• 2003-03-11 22:30 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-12 00:52 Re: GCC 3.3
• 2003-03-12 11:57 Re: the bugs database ...
• 2003-03-17 01:09 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-17 12:30 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 11:27 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
• 2003-03-18 16:16 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-18 23:59 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-22 01:33 Re: GCC 3.3 release
• 2003-03-22 09:35 Re: GCC 3.3 release
• 2003-03-22 13:24 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-22 13:40 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-23 22:18 Re: PR opt/8414
• 2003-03-24 08:06 Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
• 2003-03-27 10:51 Re: Bugzilla update and schedule for changeover

Svein E. Seldal

• 2003-03-22 20:31 Re: gcc for any microcontroller?

tammy

• 2003-03-27 23:47 hey papi

Terje Eggestad

• 2003-03-11 08:27 weak and alias
• 2003-03-11 09:16 Re: weak and alias

Thierry Moreau

• 2003-03-23 19:41 Successful 3.2.2 Port, PowerPC, MPC8xx Embedded Processor Family

Tim Josling

• 2003-03-01 10:41 At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependency from make check*
• 2003-03-01 11:32 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrom make check*
• 2003-03-01 22:19 Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrommake check*
• 2003-03-06 20:03 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-17 08:02 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)

Tkil

• 2003-03-04 07:01 Re: Using Math Functions
• 2003-03-04 07:12 Re: Using Math Functions

tm_gccmail

• 2003-03-03 20:49 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant
• 2003-03-03 22:07 Re: PPC AltiVec request: add an abi variant
• 2003-03-05 21:07 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-06 19:22 Re: Incorrectly using call-clobbered registers
• 2003-03-07 19:19 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-07 19:53 Stack-based pseudos
• 2003-03-07 23:02 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-11 19:27 Re: proposal: Default settings from environment
• 2003-03-12 20:08 Re: Supporting multiple instructions sets within a single machinedescription
• 2003-03-13 00:47 Re: How to rename data and bss sections for powerpc-eabi?
• 2003-03-21 23:53 Re: how to implement pipeline errata?
• 2003-03-22 00:58 Re: gcc for any microcontroller?
• 2003-03-24 19:36 Re: Using GCC's front-end to parse SystemC
• 2003-03-24 20:48 Re: gcc for any microcontroller?
• 2003-03-24 20:50 Re: gcc for any microcontroller?
• 2003-03-24 21:10 Re: gcc for any microcontroller?
• 2003-03-24 22:19 Re: gcc for any microcontroller?
• 2003-03-25 20:02 Re: [tm_gccmail@mail.kloo.net: Re: gcc for any microcontroller?]
• 2003-03-25 22:13 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-27 00:06 Re: New Port Contribution
• 2003-03-27 00:12 Re: New Port Contribution

Tom Gosselin

• 2003-03-12 20:13 FW: GCC cross compiler question

Tom Lord

• 2003-03-05 04:14 Re: [RFC] Parametrized macro names
• 2003-03-05 07:57 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end

Tom Tromey

• 2003-03-04 01:50 Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 17:33 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-14 21:13 Re: Time to update documentation regarding supported make implementations?
• 2003-03-14 21:25 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?)
• 2003-03-14 21:32 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?)
• 2003-03-14 21:41 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?)
• 2003-03-14 21:54 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?)
• 2003-03-14 23:21 Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?)
• 2003-03-21 17:49 Re: On alignment
• 2003-03-22 07:17 Re: On alignment
• 2003-03-24 16:33 Re: Massive libjava failures in mainline x86
• 2003-03-25 16:45 Re: java testsuite on Linux i386: 2.4.18
• 2003-03-25 18:39 Re: On alignment
• 2003-03-25 21:08 Re: On alignment
• 2003-03-25 21:27 Re: Parsing mail to Bugzilla
• 2003-03-29 17:49 Re: Java/parellel build(?) related bootstrap failure
• 2003-03-31 15:45 Re: Building OpenOffice with GCJ?
• 2003-03-31 17:50 Re: review process

Toon Moene

• 2003-03-05 20:17 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 18:30 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 20:13 Re: Does g77 have the equivalent of -r8 ???
• 2003-03-08 13:09 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-13 21:46 Re: GCC 3.3: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu added to secondary evaluationplatforms
• 2003-03-15 14:33 Re: option for default 64-bit integers in g77 and gcc on ia64
• 2003-03-16 15:28 Re: New frontend: PL/I for gcc
• 2003-03-16 15:38 Re: Listings
• 2003-03-24 23:10 Re: Lapack test suite results for gcc 3.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-03-26 22:26 Re: Lapack test suite results for gcc 3.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu

toreador

• 2003-03-12 20:24 cross gcc help needed

Ulrich Weigand

• 2003-03-07 19:11 New 3.3 libstdc++ testsuite failures on s390x (64-bit only)
• 2003-03-07 21:57 Re: New 3.3 libstdc++ testsuite failures on s390x (64-bit only)
• 2003-03-19 19:39 __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generates broken code
• 2003-03-20 20:59 RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
• 2003-03-20 22:12 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
• 2003-03-21 01:15 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
• 2003-03-21 01:29 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
• 2003-03-21 15:52 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3
• 2003-03-21 19:44 Re: RFA: Ada variable-sized objects, bit_size_type == TImode, and divti3

vanh

• 2003-03-22 13:04 build success

Vasanth.K

• 2003-03-14 05:04 Reg. gccipf pacakage (gcc-3.0)

Vikas Gandhi

• 2003-03-03 05:05 Threading problem

vipul

• 2003-03-07 01:55 gcc 3.2.2 on Mac OS X missing header??

Vladimir Makarov

• 2003-03-25 18:25 Re: DFA scheduling bug?
• 2003-03-27 15:01 Re: DFA scheduling bug?
• 2003-03-27 20:19 Re: First scheduling pass
• 2003-03-27 20:38 Re: First scheduling pass
• 2003-03-27 23:38 Re: SPEC2000 252.eon generates invalid results when compiled -O3 with g++ 3.3

Vladimir Merzliakov

• 2003-03-06 11:27 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end

Wanvisa Chaimusik

• 2003-03-05 21:28 Orchids from Thailand
• 2003-03-05 21:29 Orchids from Thailand

Will Cohen

• 2003-03-12 16:07 Re: gprof inaccuracy

Will Newton

• 2003-03-12 16:52 What optimizations does -O1 enable?

Willard Myers

• 2003-03-11 19:29 Successful build

william

• 2003-03-11 20:15 Re: Target Deprecation

William Brodie-Tyrrell

• 2003-03-04 05:45 profiling API?
• 2003-03-13 23:18 Re: profiling API?

William G. Lea

• 2003-03-10 18:47 CVS access
• 2003-03-11 19:47 [Fwd: CVS Problems and Compile Errors]
• 2003-03-16 04:04 Listings

Wolfgang Bangerth

• 2003-03-08 06:40 GCC review process: how to handle external submissions
• 2003-03-10 14:45 Re: GCC review process: how to handle external submissions
• 2003-03-25 20:57 Parsing mail to Bugzilla
• 2003-03-26 15:09 Unanalyzed PRs possibly relevant for 3.3

Xanthakis Stelios

• 2003-03-15 18:52 alloca + inline
• 2003-03-16 09:22 Re: alloca + inline
• 2003-03-16 13:15 Re: alloca + inline
• 2003-03-16 19:12 Re: alloca + inline

Yann COLLETTE

• 2003-03-13 13:21 Re: There is errors in the translation of gcc

Yit

• 2003-03-24 09:11 gcc request

Zack Weinberg

• 2003-03-01 21:30 Re: gcc and include dirs
• 2003-03-03 01:19 Re: inline-asm/9910: gcc dies on inline assembly
• 2003-03-03 17:25 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch
• 2003-03-03 18:25 Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch
• 2003-03-03 23:44 Re: inline-asm/9910: gcc dies on inline assembly
• 2003-03-04 00:20 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames
• 2003-03-04 01:22 Re: #include_next and absolute pathnames
• 2003-03-04 05:29 Target deprecation, round four
• 2003-03-04 05:45 Re: Target deprecation, round four
• 2003-03-04 06:06 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 07:37 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 17:08 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 17:29 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 17:30 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 18:14 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 18:38 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-04 19:35 Re: Target deprecation, round four
• 2003-03-05 05:22 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-05 22:05 Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.3: Make -finline-limit work (PR/8387)
• 2003-03-05 22:12 Re: Putting C++ code into gcc front end
• 2003-03-07 07:30 Re: GCC scalability wrt _extra_ large generated C files
• 2003-03-07 19:28 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-08 02:09 Re: Exceptions, C, and Gcc
• 2003-03-08 04:05 Re: Exceptions, C, and Gcc
• 2003-03-10 03:24 Re: rfc: unwinder, ppc-spe dual sized registers, and a patch...
• 2003-03-10 03:42 Re: [c++, cxx-reflection] Initial thoughts on type reflection.
• 2003-03-10 20:43 Re: target_flags
• 2003-03-11 01:38 Re: pch messages
• 2003-03-11 01:41 Re: target_flags
• 2003-03-11 02:51 Re: target_flags
• 2003-03-13 21:21 Re: Improving gcc scalability wrt _extra_ large C files
• 2003-03-14 02:10 Re: unique test case names for gcc debug.exp and pch.exp
• 2003-03-15 03:00 Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
• 2003-03-17 06:15 Re: XFAILing V3 tests.
• 2003-03-17 07:11 Re: XFAILing V3 tests.
• 2003-03-17 20:00 Re: timing of lexical analysis in -ftime-report
• 2003-03-17 21:33 RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup
• 2003-03-18 05:50 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup
• 2003-03-18 05:50 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup
• 2003-03-18 16:31 Re: RFD - cleaning up C identifier lookup
• 2003-03-19 20:41 Re: __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generates broken code
• 2003-03-20 18:19 Re: [PATCH] Fix __builtin_expect (setjmp (buf) == 0, 1)) generatesbroken code
• 2003-03-21 17:42 Re: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited
• 2003-03-22 06:25 Re: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited
• 2003-03-25 02:52 Re: Any GCC Porting for microSPARC(v8) on VxWorks?
• 2003-03-25 21:41 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-25 22:02 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-25 22:40 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-26 07:05 Re: Converting to ISO C89
• 2003-03-26 19:45 Re: bootstrap w/o compiler chestnut.

Zdenek Dvorak

• 2003-03-21 07:50 Re: new unroller vs ppc
• 2003-03-24 20:07 Re: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited
• 2003-03-29 09:49 Re: new unroller vs ppc

Zhang, Yun

• 2003-03-21 08:40 GCC 3.2.1 Bug on XScale?

zhengjun

• 2003-03-21 03:40 Build gcc on SFU(Windows service for Unix)

Ziemowit Laski

• 2003-03-14 03:08 Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)