This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Should _GNU_SOURCE be defined always?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe dot com>
Cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 11:58:12 -0800
Subject: Re: Should _GNU_SOURCE be defined always?
References: <20020217151527.A16966@alinoe.com> <20020217145627.GA24723@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20020217170939.A3788@alinoe.com>

On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 05:09:39PM +0100, Carlo Wood wrote:
> Nevertheless, my question: Can I count on it that will
> stay defined in all future versions of gcc?

No.  It's in there as a hack in g++ (not gcc) to make libstdc++
headers work properly.


r~

References:
- Should _GNU_SOURCE be defined always?
  - From: Carlo Wood
- Re: Should _GNU_SOURCE be defined always?
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: Should _GNU_SOURCE be defined always?
  - From: Carlo Wood

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]