This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Should _GNU_SOURCE be defined always?

From: Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe dot com>
To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 17:09:39 +0100
Subject: Re: Should _GNU_SOURCE be defined always?
References: <20020217151527.A16966@alinoe.com> <20020217145627.GA24723@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>

On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 02:56:27PM +0000, Neil Booth wrote:
> Careful, 2.96 (maybe) through 3.0.2 only warned about redefinitions
> if -pedantic.  This was a bug.

Ah, ok.  You're right - _GNU_SOURCE is defined as of 3.0
(not in 2.96 or 2.95.x).

Nevertheless, my question: Can I count on it that will
stay defined in all future versions of gcc?

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should _GNU_SOURCE be defined always?
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Should _GNU_SOURCE be defined always?
  - From: Carlo Wood
- Re: Should _GNU_SOURCE be defined always?
  - From: Neil Booth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]