Experience with g++ 4.8 and -frepo?

Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com
Wed Aug 27 11:25:00 GMT 2014


On 08/27/2014 12:21 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> To my untrained eye that looks like the link exclusively fails on
> libstdc++ with everything in the application getting resolved.

-frepo and libraries (static or dynamic) do not mix because the .rpo 
file management does not work.  Removing the static libraries could make 
a difference in your case, but I don't think anyone uses this feature 
anymore.

Are you sure it matters from a code size point of view?  The final link 
should eliminate all duplicate code copies even without -frepo.

-- 
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list