Experience with g++ 4.8 and -frepo?
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Wed Aug 27 11:25:00 GMT 2014
On 08/27/2014 12:21 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> To my untrained eye that looks like the link exclusively fails on
> libstdc++ with everything in the application getting resolved.
-frepo and libraries (static or dynamic) do not mix because the .rpo
file management does not work. Removing the static libraries could make
a difference in your case, but I don't think anyone uses this feature
anymore.
Are you sure it matters from a code size point of view? The final link
should eliminate all duplicate code copies even without -frepo.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list