[v3] Small clean-up to <complex>

[Paolo Carlini]

On 11/08/2011 02:43 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Paolo Carlini<paolo.carlini@oracle.com>  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Marc noticed we had a few redundant const qualifiers.
> Yes and no.  They were left redundant NOT out of careless
> or lazyness.
> At the time, it was lobbied hard that for transitional purposes,
> #defning constexpr to nothing should still let the header
> compile and that there was no need for code duplication
> for the same thing.   And that was also the basis of
> modifying the original constexpr proposal to allow
> the redundant const.
I see, thanks for the explanation!

Paolo.