regex patch

Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini@oracle.com
Fri Jun 18 19:48:00 GMT 2010


On 06/18/2010 09:42 PM, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
> Wait a minute... this abi_check failure is due to 220 added symbols, many of 
> them nothing to do with <regex>... stuff like std::future_error::what() 
> const.  Only 4 are marked as "incompatible," and they're new symbols being 
> added as well so I don't understand why they're incompatible.
>
> Would this constitute a regression?
>   
If abi_check fails is a regression. Full stop. It looks like something
is wrong with your setup, because abi_check doesn't fail for anybody
else, pre the <regex> patch, of course.

Paolo.




More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list