regex patch

Stephen M. Webb
Fri Jun 18 19:42:00 GMT 2010

On 18/06/10 15:28, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 06/18/2010 09:23 PM, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
> > One last question, though. This introduces an abi_check failure.
> > Should that
> > be fixed first?
> For sure. No regressions, please.

Wait a minute... this abi_check failure is due to 220 added symbols, many of 
them nothing to do with <regex>... stuff like std::future_error::what() 
const.  Only 4 are marked as "incompatible," and they're new symbols being 
added as well so I don't understand why they're incompatible.

Would this constitute a regression?

Stephen M. Webb

More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list