Nested std::tr1::bind problem

[Douglas Gregor]

On Mar 13, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

> Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
>> Peter Dimov wrote:
>>> _Args&... should probably be changed to _Args&&..., with the
>>> appropriate std::forward<_Args> inserted in the body if it isn't
>>> there already.
>> I'll be filling a bug report for that, thanks.
> Note, we are actually talking about std::bind, *not* std::tr1::bind,
> certainly we are not going to use rvalue references in TR1.

We're actually allowed to use rvalue references in TR1... but  
obviously we can only do so in C++0x mode.

	- Doug