Nested std::tr1::bind problem

[Paolo Carlini]

Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>> _Args&... should probably be changed to _Args&&..., with the
>> appropriate std::forward<_Args> inserted in the body if it isn't
>> there already.
> I'll be filling a bug report for that, thanks.
Note, we are actually talking about std::bind, *not* std::tr1::bind,
certainly we are not going to use rvalue references in TR1.

Paolo.