binary_search, lower_bound and upper_bound inlining
Paolo Carlini
pcarlini@suse.de
Sun Apr 1 17:43:00 GMT 2007
Dimitris Xochellis wrote:
>>Well, if you can provide unbiased, compelling evidence that code bloat
>>isn't too big...
>>
>>
>Well, I don't feel so "lucky" today :)
>(I also agree that the code bloat will probably be rather big)
>
>
As soon as I find a bit of spare time I want to investigate the issue a
bit more myself: those functions aren't *very* big and are indeed quite
important, for instance are use in our unordered_* containers. I want to
figure out how big really are in terms of instructions, etc.
>>That's sad. You should tell all the people, the compiler people too not
>>only the library developers: either the options are too hard to find or
>>wrongly missing. Can you send a message to gcc@gcc.gnu.org?
>>
>>
>Good idea, I will do so.
>
>
Excellent. Your needs are certainly sensible.
Paolo.
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list