binary_search, lower_bound and upper_bound inlining

Paolo Carlini pcarlini@suse.de
Sun Apr 1 17:43:00 GMT 2007


Dimitris Xochellis wrote:

>>Well, if you can provide unbiased, compelling evidence that code bloat 
>>isn't too big...
>>    
>>
>Well, I don't feel so "lucky" today :) 
>(I also agree that the code bloat will probably be rather big)
>  
>
As soon as I find a bit of spare time I want to investigate the issue a 
bit more myself: those functions aren't *very* big and are indeed quite 
important, for instance are use in our unordered_* containers. I want to 
figure out how big really are in terms of instructions, etc.

>>That's sad. You should tell all the people, the compiler people too not 
>>only the library developers: either the options are too hard to find or 
>>wrongly missing. Can you send a message to gcc@gcc.gnu.org?
>>    
>>
>Good idea, I will do so.
>  
>
Excellent. Your needs are certainly sensible.

Paolo.



More information about the Libstdc++ mailing list