binary_search, lower_bound and upper_bound inlining
Dimitris Xochellis
jimxoch@yahoo.gr
Sun Apr 1 17:37:00 GMT 2007
--- Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> wrote:
> Dimitris Xochellis wrote:
>
> >>we can definitely mark inline binary_search, very tiny, but frankly, for
> >>general use lower_bound and upper_bound seem too big and we risk a bad
> >>code bloat.
> >>
> >>
> >I suspected so :( That's life anyway...
> >
> >
> Well, if you can provide unbiased, compelling evidence that code bloat
> isn't too big...
Well, I don't feel so "lucky" today :)
(I also agree that the code bloat will probably be rather big)
>
> >>In general, anyway, you should refer to the gcc manual, there are
> >>various knobs you can turn in order to change the behavior of the
> >>inliner (-finline-limit=...)
> >>
> >>
> >I found nothing appropriate in the manual. (-finline-limit works for functions that are
> explicitly marked as inline)
> >
> >
> That's sad. You should tell all the people, the compiler people too not
> only the library developers: either the options are too hard to find or
> wrongly missing. Can you send a message to gcc@gcc.gnu.org?
Good idea, I will do so.
Thanks
-Jim
___________________________________________________________
ΓñçóéìïðïéΓ₯ΓΓ΄Γ₯ Yahoo!;
ΓÑñΓ₯Γ¨ΓΓͺÑôΓ₯ ôÑ Γ₯Γï÷ëçôéΓͺà ìçΓýìÑôÑ (spam); ΓΓ― Yahoo! Mail
ÀéÑèΓΓ΄Γ₯Γ© ôçà ΓͺÑëýôΓ₯Γ±Γ§ ÀáΓÑôà ðñïóôÑóΓΓ‘ ΓͺÑôà ôùà Γ₯Γï÷ëçôéΓͺΓΎΓ
ìçΓáìΓôùà http://login.yahoo.com/config/mail?.intl=gr
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list