[C++ PATCH] Don't create an INTEGER_CST for aggregates (empty structs)

[Paolo Carlini]

Hi Jason,

>On 12 Mar 2005 11:27:41 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
>
>>Second, the case of stack-based CPUs, e.g. x86-like.
>>The caller does not need any push of such trailing empty class
>>arguments on stack -- and the callee knows it has no business trying
>>to pop such value.  Consequently adjustments need to be done for the 
>>stack frame "depth". 
>>    
>>
>This assumes that we control both caller and callee, which violates the
>idea of a standardized ABI.
>  
>
Ok. Therefore, which are the implications of this? I mean, is it 
unavoidable that
the code generated on powerpc is better that on x86 (for the reasons 
explained by
Andrew in the audit trail)? Sorry about the direct question.

Thanks,
Paolo.