[C++ PATCH] Don't create an INTEGER_CST for aggregates (empty structs)
Jason Merrill
jason@redhat.com
Sun Mar 13 19:24:00 GMT 2005
On 12 Mar 2005 11:27:41 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
> Second, the case of stack-based CPUs, e.g. x86-like.
> The caller does not need any push of such trailing empty class
> arguments on stack -- and the callee knows it has no business trying
> to pop such value. Consequently adjustments need to be done for the
> stack frame "depth".
This assumes that we control both caller and callee, which violates the
idea of a standardized ABI.
Jason
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list