Change to search_n

[Jonathan Wakely]

On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 06:35:22AM +0000, Dimitris Xochellis wrote:

> Its mainly the expressions like (__last - __first >
> __count) that are producing these warnings. These
> expression will fail to work as expected in case
> __first > __last.

Wouldn't that be an invalid range, which breaks the preconditions of
search_n?

jon

-- 
Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future.
	- Niels Bohr