PATCH: libstdc++/7680 (related to RFC posted last week)

[Loren James Rittle]

In article <m3y92franv.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>,
Gabriel Dos Reis<gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:

> Loren James Rittle <rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> writes:
> | + // ...and in the darkness bind them...
> | + namespace __gnu_cxx_private

>   Why is __gnu_cxx isn't sufficient?

> I'm trying to get the whole picture.

Based on this and Benjamin's input, I will make it a nested namespace
inside __gnu_cxx .  I was independently thinking about the issue
raised by Phil where stuff directly inside __gnu_cxx is not really
private to our users.

Is __gnu_cxx::__c99_binding OK?

Regards,
Loren