PATCH: libstdc++/7680 (related to RFC posted last week)
Gabriel Dos Reis
gdr@integrable-solutions.net
Tue Apr 15 08:21:00 GMT 2003
Loren James Rittle <rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> writes:
| In article <m3y92franv.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>,
| Gabriel Dos Reis<gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:
|
| > Loren James Rittle <rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> writes:
| > | + // ...and in the darkness bind them...
| > | + namespace __gnu_cxx_private
|
| > Why is __gnu_cxx isn't sufficient?
|
| > I'm trying to get the whole picture.
|
| Based on this and Benjamin's input, I will make it a nested namespace
| inside __gnu_cxx . I was independently thinking about the issue
| raised by Phil where stuff directly inside __gnu_cxx is not really
| private to our users.
|
| Is __gnu_cxx::__c99_binding OK?
Fine with me. If you don't hear any different opinion within 24 hours,
please go ahead and check the patch in.
Thanks,
-- Gaby
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list