26_numerics/fabs_inline.cc

[Mark Mitchell]

This appears to be a brand-new test which fails due to the changes to
the handling of builtins.  The compiler issues a (seemingly correct)
error on the using directive that puts multiple declarations of `fabs'
with the same type in the same scope.  I think the
 
  #define fabs __glibcpp_fabs

stuff is necessary in std_cmath.h too, with the changes that we just
made to the builtins.

This is easy to do, but I don't have time before I turn into a
pumpkin.  Would one of you take care of it?  Or, if you like, just
XFAIL the test on the branch?  We're just banging our heads on the
same issue over and over here with the global/std namespace clashes.

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com