26_numerics/fabs_inline.cc
Gabriel Dos Reis
gdr@codesourcery.com
Thu May 24 23:35:00 GMT 2001
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
| This appears to be a brand-new test which fails due to the changes to
| the handling of builtins. The compiler issues a (seemingly correct)
| error on the using directive that puts multiple declarations of `fabs'
| with the same type in the same scope. I think the
|
| #define fabs __glibcpp_fabs
|
| stuff is necessary in std_cmath.h too, with the changes that we just
| made to the builtins.
|
| This is easy to do, but I don't have time before I turn into a
| pumpkin. Would one of you take care of it? Or, if you like, just
| XFAIL the test on the branch? We're just banging our heads on the
| same issue over and over here with the global/std namespace clashes.
The purpose of this testcase is trickier. But I'll just xfail it on
branch. Is that OK?
-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
More information about the Libstdc++
mailing list