[patch] mkcshadow improvements

[Benjamin Kosnik]

>> Also, you and Nathan should work out the _C_swamp naming convention
>> thing. Nathan, this name seems kind of silly, perhaps you could
>> come up with something that is a bit more meaningful?  

>How about just _C_, seeing its purpose is to enclose the C headers
>from the host environment, or is that reserved for something else?

Yeah this seems better to me too.

>I don't have CVS, but here's the output from "diff -r" against the
>installed include directory (attached)

Hmm. Spooky. Maybe a 'diff -cp' between the following two directories:

1) install directory with hacks
2) install directory without hacks

This would be appreciated.

>The ones that just do namespace _C_Swamp{#include_next }, with the big
>GNU copyright string were re-generated by Nathan's mkcshadow script
>(when I had found it :), having previously been a cut-and-paste job.

And what include dirs did you include?


thanks,
benjamin