Status of the GJC

[Harpal Grover]

>
>
> It's gcj.
>
> It's mostly in maintenance mode.  The compiler itself is pretty solid, but
> the Classpath runtime library isn't being developed very much.  We really
> need to port gcj to use the OpenJDK runtime libraries, which would make
> gcj an excellent product, but so far no-one has had the time to do it.

I think that's an excellent idea.

How does one start helping out with that?

Harpal Grover