classpath-0.98 merge for GCC-4.4

Joshua Sumali jsumali@redhat.com
Mon Aug 11 16:08:00 GMT 2008


Matthias Klose wrote:
> Andrew Haley schrieb:
>   
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Ideally, I'd prefer a GCJ release to be based on a Classpath
>>> release, if just so bug reports against GCJ 4.4 can be more
>>> closely linked to a Classpath release.
>>>       
>> Me too.
>>
>>     
>>> That said, I think the tree is in okay shape at the moment.  If
>>> you do merge now, I'd suggest using the time to test the
>>> completed merge, especially the new locale changes.
>>>       
>> Yes.
>>
>>     
>>> As a third option, perhaps the main merge could be done now,
>>> covering all the feature changes (GJDoc, localisation).  I
>>> could then submit the remaining bug fixes planned for 0.98 to
>>> GCJ separately, as they get sent to Classpath.  We'd then end
>>> up with 0.98 in GCJ (effectively).
>>>       
>> That's my suggestion, as long as it doesn't make too much work
>> for Doko.
>>     
>
> I can start working on this on a merge branch. But being on a conference I'm not
> sure that I will finish this before my vacation until the end of August. In the
> past Joshua did offer to do a merge as well. Joshua, would you be able to work
> on this merge as well?
>
>   Matthias
>   
I would like to, but I don't think I'll have the time to do so. My last 
day is on Wednesday and I can't guarantee any availability after that :(

Josh



More information about the Java mailing list